Author Topic: Mitt Romney, really?????? (Read 2669 times)

Luckyducker · « **on:** January 13, 2012, 05:49:24 AM »

I find it strange but not surprising that Ron Paul was way ahead in the popularity polls but failed to take Iowa's caucus which picked the RINO Mitt Romney. Then Romney takes NH in a whirlwind. I really believe our political system has been and is being de-railed. If Romney gets the nomination, which is almost a certainty, it won't matter how we vote. It is like playing a shell game with the pea in the pocket of the huckster who is, BTW, the puppeteer pulling the strings and selling both Oblabla and Romney. Does anyone else see it this way, or am I being deluded by an overactive imagination? I don't think I am.

Graybeard · « **Reply #1 on:** January 13, 2012, 07:07:42 AM »

How ya figure he won NH in a whirlwind? He took only 35% of the vote to Ron Paul's 25%. Folks can say he won Iowa all they want to but he got only 8 votes more than Santorum and both them and Ron Paul all three got the same number of delegates as I understand it.

Right now he has a VERY slim delegate lead on Ron Paul. Don't count Ron out yet but yes I do believe the establishment powers will do all they can to assure he is the nominee so that it then doesn't matter who wins the Presidency as he and the obamination are two peas in a pod. Their goals are the same to do the bidding of the NWO crowd and put an end to freedom.

O-Brother · « **Reply #2 on:** January 18, 2012, 02:55:35 PM »

The media has been telling everyone they want romney, sadly people are dumb enough to let themselves be led around by the nose

Fred.

OldSchoolRanger · « **Reply #3 on:** January 25, 2012, 05:17:10 PM »

GB - Actually Rick Santorum won in Iowa, by 34 votes.

Quote from: TM7 on January 21, 2012, 08:19:35 AM

...my understanding is if this selection process comes down to the wire in a too-close-to-call selection, and at the GOP National Convention that after two votes to select the running candidate fails to select a running candidate; they then can select anybody they want......Know who that would be..?? methinks Jeb Bush..
..TM7

Jeb Bush wouldn't be a bad candidate, although I don't think he wouldn't accept the nomination.

JimBoIHN · « **Reply #4 on:** February 08, 2012, 12:22:23 AM »

Romney has that look and that's what counts. To women he is, perhaps, handsome. To me, he looks like a lying, slick, pol. Kind of in the same way as Trump. So, I can't stand him, don't trust him, and will just ignore him after he gets in office. That's my defense mechanism - just ignore the whole crappy mess.

Cuts Crooked · « **Reply #5 on:** February 13, 2012, 12:57:08 PM »

The media knows that Romney cannot beat Obama in the general election, multiple polls revealed that fact some weeks ago, so they tend to promote him so that the left will have an easy win.

BUGEYE · « **Reply #6 on:** February 13, 2012, 01:08:43 PM »

If a person wins in a popularity poll, and loses the election, what happened between the poll and the voting booth?
how does those minds get changed?
I think polls are just BS

pspinc2003 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 13, 2012, 02:42:27 PM »

Mitt Shamney

samuelsss · « **Reply #8 on:** February 13, 2012, 05:12:51 PM »

Is most likely that Mitt is going to get the nomination. Is he the best man? I wonder how other members here at http://www.gboreloaded.com think about Mitt.

spitpatch · « **Reply #9 on:** February 18, 2012, 05:50:51 PM »

Obama Light......

srussell · « **Reply #10 on:** February 19, 2012, 09:14:58 AM »

the only thing to gain buy putting mitt in office, is that he will be a first term president looking for the second.that would hold him down some just like it did obama

cheapsandwich · « **Reply #11 on:** February 19, 2012, 12:10:45 PM »

Quote from: srussell on February 19, 2012, 09:14:58 AM

the only thing to gain buy putting mitt in office, is that he will be a first term president looking for the second.that would hold him down some just like it did obama

Exactly as I see it as well.

Duke0313 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 19, 2012, 07:29:00 PM »

All I can say is if it comes down to Mitt vs. Obummer...I know which way I'm voting!!!

Mike in Virginia · « **Reply #13 on:** March 05, 2012, 10:30:14 AM »

It's my opinion the leader of the nation should be a Christian, which Romney ain't. How can a man make good decisions affecting the lives of our own people and those wordlwide?

azvaquero · « **Reply #14 on:** March 12, 2012, 09:26:34 PM »

Mike, I am a Ron Paul man myself, but where did you get your information that Romney is not Christian?

R.W.Dale · « **Reply #15 on:** March 12, 2012, 10:31:48 PM »

Quote from: srussell on February 19, 2012, 09:14:58 AM

the only thing to gain buy putting mitt in office, is that he will be a first term president looking for the second.that would hold him down some just like it did obama

But then we have to turn around in four years and have the discipline to vote him out.

Make no mistake Romney is the medias chosen loser to Obama.

posted via mobile device.

ironglow · « **Reply #16 on:** March 12, 2012, 11:50:43 PM »

I like to see a Christian as president also..but if Romney is the nominee..we won't have one in the oval office, no matter which way the wind blows (IMO). Still, we have to weigh which one is better for the country and which one is the more conservative.
At this point it doesn't look like any shoo-in for Ron or Newt and the next president will very likely re-align the Supreme court, so we as voters still have to do our best for our country. Obviously, that comes down to ABO.. anybody but Obama.

Lucky... Don't be surprised when polls don't match the vote, there are all kinds of reasons for that. Just keep in mind however; this clown in the oval office has appointed 32 'czars' to sidestep congress, and he has done many things to tromp on the constitution. If he has done all that while having to face a re-election...just what do you think he will do when he no longer has to face another vote by the people ??
There still is a reason to vote this tyrant out..I want to keep my guns and have my grandchildren enjoy at least some of the freedoms we have enjoyed.
Our time to move against the Rinos is not during the general election, but long before that. Pick an acceptable candidate..Get out, campaign, contribute and help every way you can. ...But come general election day, even if your first choice doesn't get chosen..don't sit home and pout.
Get out and vote for the most conservative choice; Don't throw the baby out with the bath water !

BUGEYE · « **Reply #17 on:** March 13, 2012, 01:26:53 AM »

that "re-align the supreme court" thing scares the snot out of me. the scotus would override every protection we have in the constitution.

R.W.Dale · « **Reply #18 on:** March 13, 2012, 08:44:57 AM »

So your saying we should be thankful to vote in a gun banning liberal whose only claim to being conservative is that he's a tightwad.

No! Not just no but ^€√[ NO

And relax on the scotus deal. The justices most likely to retire are the liberal ones for the neat future. Plus its not like we exactly get a garentee for conservative leaning nominees from Romney anyhow.

A vote for Romney = 8 years more years of bho style liberalism in a nice "R" shaped wrapper.

posted via mobile device.

ironglow · « **Reply #19 on:** March 13, 2012, 11:59:25 AM »

Quote from: R.W.Dale on March 13, 2012, 08:44:57 AM

So your saying we should be thankful to vote in a gun banning liberal whose only claim to being conservative is that he's a tightwad.

No! Not just no but ^€√[ NO

And relax on the scotus deal. The justices most likely to retire are the liberal ones for the neat future. Plus its not like we exactly get a garentee for conservative leaning nominees from Romney anyhow.

A vote for Romney = 8 years more years of bho style liberalism in a nice "R" shaped wrapper.

posted via mobile device.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

So, whatever happens, stay home and POUT. Let's not hear complaints from you about Obammy if he gets back in, because if you stay home and pout..you have helped to re-elect him !
If that becomes the case, your complaints deserve to fall upon deaf ears !

R.W.Dale · « **Reply #20 on:** March 13, 2012, 01:07:21 PM »

Quote from: ironglow on March 13, 2012, 11:59:25 AM

Quote from: R.W.Dale on March 13, 2012, 08:44:57 AM
So your saying we should be thankful to vote in a gun banning liberal whose only claim to being conservative is that he's a tightwad.

No! Not just no but ^€√[ NO

And relax on the scotus deal. The justices most likely to retire are the liberal ones for the neat future. Plus its not like we exactly get a garentee for conservative leaning nominees from Romney anyhow.

A vote for Romney = 8 years more years of bho style liberalism in a nice "R" shaped wrapper.

posted via mobile device.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

So, whatever happens, stay home and POUT. Let's not hear complaints from you about Obammy if he gets back in, because if you stay home and pout..you have helped to re-elect him !
If that becomes the case, your complaints deserve to fall upon deaf ears !

So who do I get to complain to if I go out and vote for Romney and he sells us up the river like he did the citizens of MA?

I am not going to vote for a socialized healthcare supporting gun banning liberal. You can whore your vote out all you want the Republican party depends on nose holders like you. I don't care if Romney is the alternative to Beelzebub himself. I'm not having voted for him on my concence.

On no issues whatsoever is Romneys views fundamentally different than Obama's. The only thing that changes if he's elected is the worthless Republicans in the house and Congress will go along with whatever cockamamy Massachusetts style sceme he comes up with vs them opposing the president at every opportunity.

So by all means support the guy. Tell us how he didn't mean it when he signed ma's awb into law (see sig line)

posted via mobile device.

BUGEYE · « **Reply #21 on:** March 13, 2012, 02:48:06 PM »

I reckon some folks don't care if obama gets to appoint two SCOTUS judges.

ironglow · « **Reply #22 on:** March 13, 2012, 03:03:11 PM »

Quote from: R.W.Dale on March 13, 2012, 01:07:21 PM

Quote from: ironglow on March 13, 2012, 11:59:25 AM
Quote from: R.W.Dale on March 13, 2012, 08:44:57 AM
So your saying we should be thankful to vote in a gun banning liberal whose only claim to being conservative is that he's a tightwad.

No! Not just no but ^€√[ NO

And relax on the scotus deal. The justices most likely to retire are the liberal ones for the neat future. Plus its not like we exactly get a garentee for conservative leaning nominees from Romney anyhow.

A vote for Romney = 8 years more years of bho style liberalism in a nice "R" shaped wrapper.

posted via mobile device.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

So, whatever happens, stay home and POUT. Let's not hear complaints from you about Obammy if he gets back in, because if you stay home and pout..you have helped to re-elect him !
If that becomes the case, your complaints deserve to fall upon deaf ears !

So who do I get to complain to if I go out and vote for Romney and he sells us up the river like he did the citizens of MA?

I am not going to vote for a socialized healthcare supporting gun banning liberal. You can whore your vote out all you want the Republican party depends on nose holders like you. I don't care if Romney is the alternative to Beelzebub himself. I'm not having voted for him on my concence.

On no issues whatsoever is Romneys views fundamentally different than Obama's. The only thing that changes if he's elected is the worthless Republicans in the house and Congress will go along with whatever cockamamy Massachusetts style sceme he comes up with vs them opposing the president at every opportunity.

So by all means support the guy. Tell us how he didn't mean it when he signed ma's awb into law (see sig line)

posted via mobile device.

..................................................................

So, go ahead & back Obama..your choice ...And that's what it is all about; choices..we're free to make them..yet..

R.W.Dale · « **Reply #23 on:** March 13, 2012, 04:00:45 PM »

And that brings us to the ugly truth of the matter.

The way our primary system is set up most voters have no say so in the nomination process whatsoever! My primary isn't for another month. Do you know how long its been since by the time Arkansas voted the primary wasn't already decided.

Here's something to ponder for those of you with early primaries. You'd better think long and hard before you nominate a guy with nothing but local appeal. He needs to be able to win and carry his parties core voters. Because there's a lot of voters who didn't get a say so that your candidates have to impress to win in November when EVERYONE gets to vote.

posted via mobile device.

ironglow · « **Reply #24 on:** March 13, 2012, 04:34:42 PM »

My state doesn't hold the primary for some time. Even then, I don't get to vote. The major parties have it fixed so independents don't get a chance to vote.. But that's the way the cookie crumbles..

Mike in Virginia · « **Reply #25 on:** March 14, 2012, 04:43:00 AM »

ironglow, you are correct. If Mitt gets the GOP nod, we are doomed to a non-Christian president.
If he gets nominated, I for one will strongly consider staying home on voting day. I cannot see that Mitt is anything better than Obama.
And to those who say I have no right to complain if I don't vote, you are dead wrong. Why would I NOT complain about being presented with such a choice? One is as bad as the other. It's like the nation has gone out of its way to put the worst of the worst in Washington. The two worst choices alive today in politics is Obama and Romney.
My opinion of course, not meant to offend or tread on anyone's perspective.

ironglow · « **Reply #26 on:** March 14, 2012, 04:52:57 AM »

Quote from: Mike in Virginia on March 14, 2012, 04:43:00 AM

ironglow, you are correct. If Mitt gets the GOP nod, we are doomed to a non-Christian president.
If he gets nominated, I for one will strongly consider staying home on voting day. I cannot see that Mitt is anything better than Obama.
And to those who say I have no right to complain if I don't vote, you are dead wrong. Why would I NOT complain about being presented with such a choice? One is as bad as the other. It's like the nation has gone out of its way to put the worst of the worst in Washington. The two worst choices alive today in politics is Obama and Romney.
My opinion of course, not meant to offend or tread on anyone's perspective.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Suppose Mitt gets the nod..if he selects a strong Christian running mate, would that help ? Another point we can consider; although Mormons do not view Christ as we do, they do have good family values and try to be morally correct, which may help.
When compared to Obama, all I can say is I will be voting for a president, not a pastor. Romney and Obama both claim to be Christians..one is as much Christian as the other (IMO) so there is little choice there..
When I "judge them by their fruit'..my opinion falls to one more than the other, but you can decide that for yourself..

R.W.Dale · « **Reply #27 on:** March 14, 2012, 08:13:17 AM »

You guys need to sit down and ponder using LOGIC and not emotion the political ramifications of electing an openly anti2a REPUBLICAN president.

If you go down this road and set this precident (out of fear) you will send a message to the GOP that they don't need the gun owining community. How long after that do you guys think it'll be before we see another pro 2a presidential candidate? NEVER THATS WHEN!

We will be screwed FOREVER vs just for four more years. A Romney win is WORSE in the long run than an Obama who gets to term limit out.

posted via mobile device.