Author Topic: Indiana now has spcl license plates for perverts. (Read 1409 times)

powderman · « **on:** January 18, 2012, 04:49:15 PM »

Ind. unveils its 1st license plate for gay youth

Posted: Jan 18, 2012 9:40 AM EST Updated: Jan 18, 2012 10:24 AM EST

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - Indiana's first specialty license plate that benefits gay causes is now available for purchase.
The Bureau of Motor Vehicles says the Indiana Youth Group plate has been available since Dec. 28. The plate bears a logo with hands in rainbow colors reaching up out of a circle.
Some $25 from sales of each $40 plate goes to the group serving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth.
Youth Group Director Mary Byrne tells The Indianapolis Star (http://indy.st/zl90uE ) that Indiana is the second state in the nation with a specialty plate benefiting gay youths. She says Maryland was the first.
The Youth Group sued the state in 2010 after the BMV twice turned down its request for a specialty plate. Both sides later reached an agreement and the plate was approved.

I thought I'd heard it all. Sickening. POWDERMAN.

DalesCarpentry · « **Reply #1 on:** January 18, 2012, 05:40:51 PM »

I was hoping when I read the title to your thread that sex offenders had to have a certain license plate so all people knew who to stay away from and for police to keep a better eye on them. Now tell me that would not be a great plate! Dale

Sourdough · « **Reply #2 on:** January 18, 2012, 08:10:22 PM »

Darn, I was thinking the same thing as Dale.

Lon371 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2012, 08:54:28 PM »

Dale

That is a great idea!!! But this plate will basicly do the same, just will not be the police watching them

Lonny

bobg · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2012, 09:43:11 PM »

I thought the same as Dale. This is a sick world we live in.

.

williamlayton · « **Reply #5 on:** January 19, 2012, 12:54:34 AM »

The problem as I see it is that this is for minors. The suit would have to be filed by an adult.
Now, I may be wrong, but, I just don't see a parent starting a youth group for their children.
Who is pushing this training camp? I know what they teach in the Boy Scouts---what skills and techniques are taught in this group?
Blessings

52bagman · « **Reply #6 on:** January 19, 2012, 04:49:05 AM »

I'd like to know what Archie Bunker would say.

powderman · « **Reply #7 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:10:13 AM »

Quote from: 52bagman on January 19, 2012, 04:49:05 AM

I'd like to know what Archie Bunker would say.

HEH, I think we all know the answer. Pretty sick society when folks are PROUD to be a pervert, and advertise it. Dale has a great idea though. Might be funny to buy a plate to put on your bosses car or somebody you don't like though. POWDERMAN.

lakota · « **Reply #8 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:19:22 AM »

Ohio considered a special plate for sex offenders but it didnt go anywhere. As usual the rights of the criminal are held in higher regard than the rights of the public at large.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,309503,00.html

BBF · « **Reply #9 on:** January 19, 2012, 10:37:51 AM »

Quote from: bobg on January 18, 2012, 09:43:11 PM

I thought the same as Dale. This is a sick world we live in. .

Not in all parts of the world.

OldSchoolRanger · « **Reply #10 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:33:47 PM »

Quote from: 52bagman on January 19, 2012, 04:49:05 AM

I'd like to know what Archie Bunker would say.

52bagman - Here you go!

I loved that show, he beat everyone up.

Archie Bunker: Little boys who play with dolls grow up to be other boys' roommates.

from:"All in the Family: Mike and Gloria's Will" (1976)

Archie Bunker: California is full of nuts and fruits. Every fruit is a little nutty and every nut is a little fruity.

from: "All in the Family: Mike's New Job (1978)

52bagman · « **Reply #11 on:** January 19, 2012, 10:46:50 PM »

X-C-LENT

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #12 on:** January 20, 2012, 02:12:45 AM »

When normal folks learn to not give attention to gays they will stop shoving it in peoples faces. They are looking for reaction and attention.

lakota · « **Reply #13 on:** January 20, 2012, 05:33:38 AM »

Quote from: SHOOTALL on January 20, 2012, 02:12:45 AM

When normal folks learn to not give attention to gays they will stop shoving it in peoples faces. They are looking for reaction and attention.

Thats exactly what I dont understand about gays. If someone wants to be gay then fine its really none of my business but why do I have to see it flaunted everytime I turn around or turn on the TV or hear it when I turn on the radio? I dont go prancing around yelling about being a heterosexual every minute of the day. Their personal lives should be exactly that-personal and not a public affair.

powderman · « **Reply #14 on:** January 20, 2012, 05:44:09 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 05:33:38 AM

Quote from: SHOOTALL on January 20, 2012, 02:12:45 AM
When normal folks learn to not give attention to gays they will stop shoving it in peoples faces. They are looking for reaction and attention.

Thats exactly what I dont understand about gays. If someone wants to be gay then fine its really none of my business but why do I have to see it flaunted everytime I turn around or turn on the TV or hear it when I turn on the radio? I dont go prancing around yelling about being a heterosexual every minute of the day. Their personal lives should be exactly that-personal and not a public affair.

LAKOTA. Agreed Sir. Kinda hard to ignore when the libs have insinuated those perverts into every aspect of our lives. Shows like ellen degenerate should not be allowed on tv promoting her perversion. POWDERMAN.

guzzijohn · « **Reply #15 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:57:04 AM »

Quote from Powderman:
"LAKOTA. Agreed Sir. Kinda hard to ignore when the libs have insinuated those perverts into every aspect of our lives. Shows like ellen degenerate should not be allowed on tv promoting her perversion. POWDERMAN.

So now you are in favor of more government intervention and censorship since it would match your agenda. You would be screaming bloody murder if Rush, Sean, Glen, etc. were not allowed.
GuzziJohn

lakota · « **Reply #16 on:** January 20, 2012, 07:15:06 AM »

I'll tell you what I am for-its a pretty simple concept: "your business is your business and my business is mine." I'll tell you what I am against-you trying to make your business my business. I am also against "compartmentalizing" history so to speak. Why do we need gay history taught in schools? Why cant we just teach history? Lets say Dr. X cures cancer. If Dr. X were gay it would be noted in the history books. If Dr. X were heterosexual no mention would be made of his/her sexual orientation. What does sexual orientation have to do with curing cancer and why should it even be mentioned one way or the other?

What does sexual orientation have to with anything for that matter unless you are talking about it with your significant other?

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #17 on:** January 20, 2012, 07:56:40 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 19, 2012, 05:19:22 AM

Ohio considered a special plate for sex offenders but it didnt go anywhere.

Really? Surprisingly smart move on part of Ohio legislators. It would be a very, very stoopid thing to do. Clearly, they're smarter than the 'no sharia' jokers in OK legislature... .

Quote

As usual the rights of the criminal are held in higher regard than the rights of the public at large.

There's an interesting perspective. In your scenario, what rights of the public are being disregarded, or held in lower regard?

lakota · « **Reply #18 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM »

Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #19 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:09:29 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM

Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

your contempt & disapproval is noted. No semantic games; it's your post I'm referring to. I was hoping you'd explain your view of how the public's rights are being short-changed by not having a speshul lic plate to identify someone convicted of a crime (certain crimes?) at some point. That's the position you were taking, right? No?

Maybe we should require special plates for the cars of gun owners... or maybe for Jewish people?

How about for Muslims?

BBF · « **Reply #20 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:09:39 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM

Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

+1 in this case.

powderman · « **Reply #21 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:15:17 AM »

Quote from: BBF on January 20, 2012, 08:09:39 AM

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM
Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

+1 in this case.

+2. POWDERMAN.

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #22 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:23:16 AM »

Quote from: powderman on January 20, 2012, 08:15:17 AM

+2. POWDERMAN.

+3.11

lakota · « **Reply #23 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:30:38 AM »

Quote from: yellowtail3 on January 20, 2012, 08:09:29 AM

your contempt & disapproval is noted. No semantic games; it's your post I'm referring to. It would be useful if you'd explain how the public's rights are being short-changed by not having a speshul lic plate to identify someone convicted of a crime (certain crimes?) at some point. That's the position you were taking, right? No?

Maybe we should require special plates for the cars of gun owners... or maybe for Jewish people?

How about for Muslims?

I say again:

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM

Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #24 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:34:54 AM »

an uncharitable reply to a civil question, Lakota

lakota · « **Reply #25 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:36:21 AM »

Quote from: yellowtail3 on January 20, 2012, 08:09:29 AM

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:05:27 AM
Pot stirring and pointless drivel...as usual. Figure it out for yourself. I am not playing your little semantic games.

your contempt & disapproval is noted. No semantic games; it's your post I'm referring to. I was hoping you'd explain your view of how the public's rights are being short-changed by not having a speshul lic plate to identify someone convicted of a crime (certain crimes?) at some point. That's the position you were taking, right? No?

Maybe we should require special plates for the cars of gun owners... or maybe for Jewish people?

How about for Muslims?

And just to let the air out of your "clever" little analogy. Its not illegal to be gay or a gun owner or a jew or a muslim...however in most places it is illegal to be a sex offender. So go ahead and go back to the drawing boards and get back to me.

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #26 on:** January 20, 2012, 08:43:44 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 08:36:21 AM

Its not illegal to be gay or a gun owner or a jew or a muslim...however in most places it is illegal to be a sex offender

I'm aware of that (though we do have some citizens who consider Muslims to be The Enemy).
Back to you post: I understood your position to be that someone convicted of a crime should have some kind of scarlet letter on their auto lic plate, identifying to them to the public - was that not your meaning? And that the right of the public is being short-changed, if convicts are not so identified?

lakota · « **Reply #27 on:** January 20, 2012, 11:11:47 AM »

In Ohio habitual DUI offenders are required to display a special liscense plate. Note:HABITUAL OFFENDERS. You dont get one on the first pop. I suspect it would have been the same with the sex offender plate. Wouldnt it be nice to know that the guy in the van hanging out by your little girl's school without reason is a repeat pedophile? Or are you going to argue that a repeat pedophile who has no kids in the school has just as much right to hang out in front of the elementary school as anyone else does?

Oh and nice try on the attempt to turn this into a muslim rights issue.

yellowtail3 · « **Reply #28 on:** January 20, 2012, 11:16:17 AM »

Quote from: lakota on January 20, 2012, 11:11:47 AM

Or are you going to argue that a repeat pedophile who has no kids in the school has just as much right to hang out in front of the elementary school as anyone else does?

No, but I'll maintain that identifying folks like that is dangerous and not a good idea. I understand it appeals to certain types.

powderman · « **Reply #29 on:** January 20, 2012, 01:09:20 PM »

LAKOTA. Spcl plates might be good, they could read something like this. Ima thief, Ima pervert, Ima child molester, Ima drunk, Ima doper, Ima speeder. They could then be numbered from #1 on up til the last was covered. Seems simple enough to me. What ya think?? POWDERMAN.