If you allow Obama to stay in office that's what you voted for by default.
THIS IS WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY!!!!! You will willingly vote for a socialist candidate who disguises himself as a conservative, who is anti-gun, is pro spending just so you can get rid of an anti gun pro spending President!
Obama = Romeny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Exactly , what has America benefited with a Romney figurehead in office ...... Nothing, zip Nada , the big goose egg, status Quo. Cronyism.
In addition to the Anti-gun issues I have with him , I have other issues
1, “I want individuals to have their own insurance. That means the insurance company will have an incentive to keep you healthy. It also means that if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. You know, if someone doesn’t give me the good service I need, I want to say, ‘You know, I’m going to go get someone else to provide that service to me.’ “
Mitt misses the point ,
It's not that we cant fire our Health INS companies we can do that now, it's the fact they can fire us and do!!!.
2. "'There were a couple of times when I wondered whether I was going to get a pink slip".
Mitt misses the point -
Ok I'm knit picking however , There is a big difference in receiving a pink slip when your net worth is 50k or less a year , then when your net worth is 100 Billion or more.
3, "Corporations are people too"
Mitt misses the point -
No they are not. Citizens United is one of the worst rulings ever to be handed down from the Supreme Court. Corporations are
entities not people and only beholding to specific people , their shareholders. Employees are a necessary overhead. If corporations can fully automate, reduce number of employees, reduce infrastructure, lower labor costs by off-shoring - they do. Thats not a jab, thats what corporations do. Corportaions are entities that exist to make profits for their stakeholders. They are not people.
4. I'll bet you 10 thousand dollars.
Mitt misses the point -
Ok I am knit picking here also , however Mitt doesn't understand how a bet like that is out of touch with the common man. Even Perry was set aback. To Mitt 10k is a tip, and a small wager. To the average middle class that's probably 1/4 of yearly income. No common man could wager that amount. I am not faulting him it's just that's he has been in the upper brackets for so long you have lost touch with the real America.
5. "I got a little bit of income from my book, but I gave that all away. Then, I get speakers fees from time to time, but not very much.”
Mitt misses the point -
He calls 374k in speaking fees not very much. last year given the number of speeches he gave, that equates to 41k an hour , 374kk is 7 times more than most people made all year. Again Mitt is out of touch with the common man. He simply cannot represent the vast majority of conservative Americans because he is not cut from the same cloth. And rather than just embrace this fact he keeps trying to be a man of the Streets. Give me a break.
6.“For the past 10 years, my income comes overwhelmingly from investments made in the past, rather than ordinary income or earned annual income." “It’s probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything,”
Now we come to the crux of my main issue with Mitt.
I cannot trust Mitt with true tax reform. Period.
I'm sure Mitt is doing everything leagle the Tax codes allow , but that's the problem. To only have to pay 15% because tax codes allow the most wealthy in our country lower tax rates with regards monies made off of investments etc, while that same tax code socks middle class workers with higher tax rates on earned income from working is just wrong.
I also have an issue with Mitts off-shore cayman island accounts that are set up to dodge paying ones fair share in taxes.
Under Mitts tax plan, taxes will increase on working poor and middle class while giving even more tax breaks to the most wealthy "Job creators? " than they have now. Mitts Cronys have had tax cuts for years. Where are the Jobs ? oh yeah offshore , and Mitt wants to provide them with even more tax breaks?. Trickle down economics has never worked ...ever!!!
I would no sooner put the The fox in charge of watching the hen house.. I have seen this all play before and know how it ends - RINO, Status Quo, corporate cronysim , and out of touch with the common man.
- JMHO
