Author Topic: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's  (Read 1415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Empty Quiver

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« on: February 02, 2012, 07:36:38 AM »
What are the reasons to consider a Stampede (or other Italian repro) over the Blackhawk?


It would seem the consensus is that the Rugers are a robust design and moderately priced. However I know there are those who think the Colt's knockoffs are preferable.


 What gives? I am admittedly ignorant and honestly can't see a nickles worth of difference between the two, save the hammer bar. I would use the thing for general dinking around likely not even hunt, but might if they prove more accurate in my hands than an auto.
**Concealed Carry...Because when seconds count help is only minutes away**

Offline guzzijohn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3037
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2012, 08:25:26 AM »
For what it is worth here is my thoughts. Currently in SAs I have a 7.5" BH in .357 a an Uberti "El Patron" 5.5" in Colt .45 which is part of the "Cattleman" series but refined from the factory with case colored frame, sight channel widened and the front sight widened. It also comes with Wolf springs and a trigger and action job. I bought it a few months ago new for $500 which is what the Stampede was also going for. Both are very accurate. The Uberti is better timed and has a better trigger although the BH trigger is not bad by any means. I have smaller than average hands so the Uberti fits me better. The Uberti just feels better balanced and just has a better feel which I cannot really explain. The target picture is from the first five shots right out of the box with Mag-Tech 200 gr. rounds at 50'. Can't ask for much more than that. Either will serve you fine.
GuzziJohn




Offline Brett

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5148
  • Gender: Male
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2012, 08:34:25 AM »
IMO, the cowboy action crowed, the purest amongst them at least, prefer the Colt clones due to tradition, authenticity,  'correct' feel and handling, etc.   

For the uses you describe a BH really fills the bill better.  It's of a modern design and materials that which can handle the hottest hunting loads with the added benefit of adjustable sites.

It boils down to what your game is, CAS or hunting live critters, and personal preference.
Life memberships:  <><, NRA, BASS, NAFC

Offline AtlLaw

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6405
  • Gender: Male
  • A good woman, nice bike and fine guns!
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2012, 02:42:00 PM »
What Brett said!   ;D
 
I'm going squirrel hunting this weekend.  Along with my 22 rifle I'll carry my 45 Colt Uberti clone stoked with 250 gr. rnfp's I loaded to about 800 fps.
 
Hi-ebber, and day always be a hi-ebber, if I were to carry a single action every day for whatever reason, I would carry one of the new Ruger 44 Spl. Flat Tops.
 
Don't ask me why...  :-\  Matter of fact, lock this thread or I'll be overcome with the irresistible urge to contact Lipsey's...  ::)
Richard
Former Captain of Horse, keeper of the peace and interpreter of statute.  Currently a Gentleman of leisure.
Nemo me impune lacessit

                      
Support your local US Military Vets Motorcycle Club

Offline tacklebury

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
  • Gender: Male
  • Central Michigan
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2012, 04:31:20 PM »
What are the reasons to consider a Stampede (or other Italian repro) over the Blackhawk?

Answer in my book = none.  Maybe if I had money to burn and just wanted one for show-n-tell.  I like and can only afford working guns and don't do CASS, so min'll be Blackhawk thankee..  ;)  I know some guys love'em, but they are just bling to me.
 
Tacklebury --}>>>>>    Multi-Barrel: .223 Superlite, 7mm-08 22", .30-40 Krag M158, .357 Maximum 16-1/4 HB, .45 Colt, .45-70 22" irons, 32" .45-70 Peeps, 12 Ga. 3-1/2 w/ Chokes, .410 Smooth slugger, .45 Cal Muzzy, .50 Cal Muzzy, .58 Cal Muzzy

also classics: M903 9-shot Target .22 Revolver, 1926 .410 Single, 1915 38 S&W Break top Revolver and 7-shot H&R Trapper .22 6" bbl.


Offline timothy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2012, 05:33:39 PM »
It depends on your definition on dinking around. I shoot my adjustable sighted revolvers at 50 yards routinely, people are shocked when i tell them this. I know guys who never shoot past 25 feet, and for that kind of shooting fixed sights are a lot of fun and work well. Im a fan of the saa for close shooting, the 4 clicks and half cocking are sorta fun like driving a manual transmision.

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18285
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2012, 12:28:57 AM »
if you want the look and balance of a colt or are doing cowboy reinactments you may be better served by a colt copy. If your buying a gun to hunt with or to shoot the snot out of a ruger is usually a stronger and  more durable gun and being american made alot easier to get repairs done or find replacement or aftermarket parts and accessorys for.
blue lives matter

Offline flatgate

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 158
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2012, 03:00:06 AM »
I routinely shoot my .45 cal. Blackhawks with handloads that propel 325 grain bullets at 1200 fps.  They are capable of good groups at 100 yards and will clang 12" gongs at that distance with every shot.






A foreign made revolver won't do that.


JMHO,


flatgate




Offline Duke0313

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 414
  • Gender: Male
  • I am the way, the truth, and the life. -John 14:6
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2012, 09:16:41 PM »
Colts and clones are the pretty girls you want someone to see on your arm. Blackhawks are the girls you marry 'cuz they work hard and put up with most of your $#!+!
"Republic:  I like the sound of the word -- means people can live free, talk free, go or come, buy or sell, however they choose.  Some words give you a deep feeling.  Republic is one of those words that makes me tight in the throat. -John Wayne- The Alamo

Offline huntswithdogs

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 999
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2012, 09:43:10 AM »
Short barreled BH, hands down!

HWD

Offline Frank V

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 381
  • Gender: Male
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2012, 04:49:04 PM »
Empty Quiver


If you want the best of both worlds consider a Ruger New Vaquero. They give almost the feel of a Colt SAA & you can carry 6 rounds safely. They won't take the heavy loads that say Ruger only, but will serve very well.
Frank
" U.S.A. RIDE FOR THE BRAND OR LEAVE!"

Offline gcrank1

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7644
  • Gender: Male
Re: ? regarding BH vs traditional SA's
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2012, 03:07:51 AM »
As the price has gone up on the Italian repros they have lost their appeal to me. Currently, around here, you can pick up a Ruger for about the same money (used), especially the bigger/more powerful calibers from those guys who thought they wanted the snot and dont reload. I agree that the new Vaq. size feels better to me, in balance and point, for a carry/fun gun.
For honest disclosure though, I need tell you that I have a NMBH .357 Ruger and an older Uberti made Millenium .45C (from the $200-$250 NIB days). Both work very well and will likely last beyond the rest of my life. I know I can take the Uberti to most 'cowboy' events and get by, the Ruger, no. If I had to take one into the wilderness not knowing when I would come out, it would be the Ruger.
BUT, for your stated purpose, I heartily recommend a 'cowboy' revolver in 22LR, hands down, aint no doubt, on my oath and mother's grave! You will have a blast, be able to shoot it a LOT and wont regret it.
"Halt while I adjust my accoutrements!"
      ><   ->
We are only temporary caretakers of the past heading toward an uncertain future
22Mag UV / 22LR  Sportster
357Mag Schuetzen Special
45-70  SS Ultra Hunter with UV cin.lam. wood
12ga. 'Ol' Ugly OverKill', Buck barrel c/w  SpeedStock  and swap 28" x Full bird barrel, 1974