I saw that also. He is extremely lucky he is not being charged with reckless endangerment, although he did nothing to actually " endanger" the child. What he did was display exactly the reason that child was like she was, following his example. He became enraged, not good, publicly , not good, actually publishing it world wide- thereby displaying exhibitionist tendencies, seeking group sympathy, and on top of that he destroyed valuable property for no valid reason. He could have sold it, given it away, donated it to someone, but instead he displayed a completely juvenile response, wanton destruction simply because his feelings were hurt. Wonderful example of parenting, self control and restraint. On top of that, he involved a firearm, a deadly weapon which provides additional fodder for the anti-gun crowd, and I am sure that is what engendered the thoughts of Reckless Endangerment. If he had IT skills I am sure he could have given the machine a virus to "kill it" or better yet, put everything on dial-up so she could learn patience @ so many kbps. If he had done this to any adults computer, say his wifes, even if he had purchased it himself, I guarantee he would now be under a restraining order. If he had simply had a philosophy of work, tolerance and patience, and started ingraining that in the child by the time he started potty training he would not now have a problem.