Author Topic: DELEGATES  (Read 473 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
DELEGATES
« on: March 14, 2012, 10:38:53 AM »
Winner   take   all  or   proportional  .  Which   method   of   alotting   Delegates   do   you   prefer?

Offline PowPow

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1838
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2012, 12:56:13 PM »
Depends on if my guy wins or not.
Yesterday I was a proportional fan.
But in November I will be glad the big one is winner take all.




The difference between people who do stuff and people who don't do stuff is that the people who do stuff do stuff.

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 04:36:24 AM »
I like proportional representation.
 
 As the USA is a two party country it doesn't matter in the election but would work in the distribution of the Delegates.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2012, 04:44:38 AM »
Makes no difference to me, since my state only allows those represented by a major party to vote in primaries.  Being independent, I don't ghet to vote, so ....MOX NIX !
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2012, 04:48:00 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2012, 04:51:02 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
   Agreed, for those who can vote..proportional is the most equitable way.  "Winner take all"  sounds like a scheme dreamed up by a confirmed gambler.. ;) ;D
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2012, 05:21:42 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
   Agreed, for those who can vote..proportional is the most equitable way.  "Winner take all"  sounds like a scheme dreamed up by a confirmed gambler.. ;) ;D
YES   ;    Florida    a   winner   take   all    state  ,sure    gave    Romney    a    good   head    start.

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2012, 05:27:22 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
   Agreed, for those who can vote..proportional is the most equitable way.  "Winner take all"  sounds like a scheme dreamed up by a confirmed gambler.. ;) ;D
YES   ;    Florida    a   winner   take   all    state  ,sure    gave    Romney    a    good   head    start.
Florida is no longer winner-take-all since they moved up their primary.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2012, 05:49:58 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
   Agreed, for those who can vote..proportional is the most equitable way.  "Winner take all"  sounds like a scheme dreamed up by a confirmed gambler.. ;) ;D
YES   ;    Florida    a   winner   take   all    state  ,sure    gave    Romney    a    good   head    start.
Florida is no longer winner-take-all since they moved up their primary.
I  sure   thought   all   DELEGATES  were   awarded    to   Romney    after   the   Florida   caucus.

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: DELEGATES
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2012, 06:14:13 AM »
when it's winner take all, some folks vote don't count.
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
   Agreed, for those who can vote..proportional is the most equitable way.  "Winner take all"  sounds like a scheme dreamed up by a confirmed gambler.. ;) ;D
YES   ;    Florida    a   winner   take   all    state  ,sure    gave    Romney    a    good   head    start.
Florida is no longer winner-take-all since they moved up their primary.
I  sure   thought   all   DELEGATES  were   awarded    to   Romney    after   the   Florida   caucus.
correction...... fla did indeed award all to romney.  they lost half of their delegates when they moved up their primary.  the RNC was going to make them proportional but then decided that they couldn't punish them twice.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye