Author Topic: Is This Legal! Is this a new way of registering firearms and owners? Please Read (Read 732 times)

Redtail1949 · « **on:** March 23, 2012, 01:59:10 PM »

I recieved this from a close personal friend yesterday. Has anyone ever heard of this occurring before? This can not be legal can it?
Read:
"Today proved to be a real eye opener to where we are heading. Today my daughter-in-law took our 16 month old grand daughter to the clinic for her regular scheduled checkup. Same as every other time with one exception. The nurse asked if there were any firearms in the house. Obviously, mom said no and asked why she asked. The nurse told her that had she said yes, any concealed weapons permit would be suspended and the parties would be put on a "watch list" similar to the medical marajuana list. This happened TODAY the 22nd of March 2012....those of you who have been a skeptic...HEADS UP!!!

Concerned
This happened in Colorado! Redtail1949

45-70.gov · « **Reply #1 on:** March 23, 2012, 02:21:03 PM »

have you called the NRA?

Redtail1949 · « **Reply #2 on:** March 23, 2012, 02:39:18 PM »

I have not as of yet. My friend is thinking over a letter to them. It has him spooked out for sure! If he does not I will.

Thanks for the reply,
Redtail1949

mechanic · « **Reply #3 on:** March 23, 2012, 02:42:23 PM »

My daughter had much the same question asked of her. She replied, "that ma'am is none of anyone's business but mine".

Ben

Curtis · « **Reply #4 on:** March 24, 2012, 06:41:38 AM »

Here is a similar story from 2010:
http://www.ocala.com/article/20100724/ARTICLES/7241001

Sounds like the doctor could be biased against guns, but he could also just be well meaning but unaware that such questions could put many folks on the defensive.

Curtis

Curtis · « **Reply #5 on:** March 24, 2012, 06:49:05 AM »

...........upon looking further I see that there has been at least one study along these lines. Their conclusion is that councilling on safe gun storage may help, though the findings are not statistically large enough to prove a diffence in practices. Additionally any impact on gun related accidents in the home was unclear at best.

http://www.med.umich.edu/pediatrics/ebm/cats/firearms.htm

Basically sounds like a few doctors got wind of the studies and decided to take it upon themselves to do something that "seemed reasonable" to them, but had not proven to be effective. Not the kind of doctor I would want making even my health decisions, much less my life decisions.

Curtis

mcbammer · « **Reply #6 on:** March 24, 2012, 07:08:33 AM »

Quote from: Redtail1949 on March 23, 2012, 01:59:10 PM

I recieved this from a close personal friend yesterday. Has anyone ever heard of this occurring before? This can not be legal can it?
Read:
"Today proved to be a real eye opener to where we are heading. Today my daughter-in-law took our 16 month old grand daughter to the clinic for her regular scheduled checkup. Same as every other time with one exception. The nurse asked if there were any firearms in the house. Obviously, mom said no and asked why she asked. The nurse told her that had she said yes, any concealed weapons permit would be suspended and the parties would be put on a "watch list" similar to the medical marajuana list. This happened TODAY the 22nd of March 2012....those of you who have been a skeptic...HEADS UP!!!

Concerned
This happened in Colorado! Redtail1949

I would have beleived New York , but not Colorado . Id find a new clinic.

Cuts Crooked · « **Reply #7 on:** March 24, 2012, 08:52:10 AM »

Quote from: Redtail1949 on March 23, 2012, 01:59:10 PM

The nurse told her that had she said yes, any concealed weapons permit would be suspended and the parties would be put on a "watch list" similar to the medical marajuana list.

Uh, was she saying that the clinic had the right to suspend a permit, or that they would quit providing treatment? I'm not real clear on that $:-\$

Curtis · « **Reply #8 on:** March 24, 2012, 09:19:27 AM »

Cuts, it sounds to me in that case like an "anti" was embellishing upon the studies or clinic procedure in order to achieve greater affect (fear) towards her victims. It wouldn't be the first time!

Curtis

45-70.gov · « **Reply #9 on:** March 24, 2012, 11:03:37 AM »

This statement reaffirms the 1992 position of the American Academy of Pediatrics that the absence of guns from children's homes and communities is the most reliable and effective measure to prevent firearm-related injuries in children and adolescents. A number of specific measures are supported to reduce the destructive effects of guns in the lives of children and adolescents, including the regulation of the manufacture, sale, purchase, ownership, and use of firearms; a ban on handguns and semiautomatic assault weapons; and expanded regulations of handguns for civilian use. In addition, this statement reviews recent data, trends, prevention, and intervention strategies of the past 5 years.
[/size][/color]
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/105/4/888.full