Author Topic: Pot stirrer al says civil disobedience will increase if Zimmerman isn't arrested (Read 1020 times)

powderman · « **on:** March 30, 2012, 03:36:53 PM »

Al Sharpton: Civil disobedience will escalate if Zimmerman remains free 2:22 p.m. EST, March 30, 2012| By Arelis R. Hernández, Orlando Sentinel

- Share117K

If George Zimmerman is not arrested in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin soon, theRev. Al Sharpton will call for an escalation in peaceful civil disobedience and economic sanctions.
Sharpton would not say the efforts would be taken against the city of Sanford specifically, but he has been critical of the police department's handling of the case

Hooker · « **Reply #1 on:** March 30, 2012, 06:17:02 PM »

He kind of reminds you of a ring leader for a lynch mob. Don't ya think?

srussell · « **Reply #2 on:** March 30, 2012, 06:23:27 PM »

we have heard that many times be for

guzzijohn · « **Reply #3 on:** March 31, 2012, 02:15:05 AM »

ABC just showed a video of Zimmerman arriving at the police station for questioning. It shows a clear picture of the back of his head and his face, no signs of injury, blood or trauma.
GuzziJohn

GUNNUT in Iowa · « **Reply #4 on:** March 31, 2012, 02:54:51 AM »

" . . . economic sanctions . . . "

Now, that's funny, right there.

magooch · « **Reply #5 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:25:03 AM »

I would be mores than happy to join a demonstration to have Al Sharpton arrested for attempted incitement to riot. He should also be arrested for running his mouth while being stupid.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #6 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:27:02 AM »

http://earsucker.com/2012/trayvon-martins-death-covered-by-people-magazine/

typical media coverage.....

compared to this racist attack and the way the media covered it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRqLVjOuSWQ&feature=related

mcwoodduck · « **Reply #7 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:35:50 AM »

The head of the NAACP said he disagreed with Al.
In the Tawana Brawley case he did the same thing only to find out that he was wrong to back her.
If there is violence I would like to see Al Charged with inciting a riot.

nw_hunter · « **Reply #8 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:44:28 AM »

Quote from: mcwoodduck on March 31, 2012, 03:35:50 AM

The head of the NAACP said he disagreed with Al.
In the Tawana Brawley case he did the same thing only to find out that he was wrong to back her.
If there is violence I would like to see Al Charged with inciting a riot.

Here is pat Buchanan's take on Jessie and Al getting involved.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/its-all-about-race-now/

BUGEYE · « **Reply #9 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:53:17 AM »

I fear that the young folks that follow Al will get out of hand, and the Fla crackers being armed, it won't turn out well.

mcwoodduck · « **Reply #10 on:** March 31, 2012, 04:06:10 AM »

Quote from: BUGEYE on March 31, 2012, 03:53:17 AM

I fear that the young folks that follow Al will get out of hand, and the Fla crackers being armed, it won't turn out well.

I take offense to the term cracker. It refers to the middle managment of the plantation, the one that Cracked the Whip to keep the slaves moving and in line.
What about the word Citizens in stead "...Citizens being legally armed and protecting themselfs, their families, and their property this can get out of hand quickly".
And it was armed citizens in Los Angeles that kept the King riots from getting further out of hand.

BUGEYE · « **Reply #11 on:** March 31, 2012, 06:14:38 AM »

Quote from: mcwoodduck on March 31, 2012, 04:06:10 AM

Quote from: BUGEYE on March 31, 2012, 03:53:17 AM
I fear that the young folks that follow Al will get out of hand, and the Fla crackers being armed, it won't turn out well.
I take offense to the term cracker. It refers to the middle managment of the plantation, the one that Cracked the Whip to keep the slaves moving and in line.
What about the word Citizens in stead "...Citizens being legally armed and protecting themselfs, their families, and their property this can get out of hand quickly".
And it was armed citizens in Los Angeles that kept the King riots from getting further out of hand.

that was tongue-in-cheek after a member here refered to me as a "white cracker"

saddlebum · « **Reply #12 on:** March 31, 2012, 06:26:27 AM »

Quote from: magooch on March 31, 2012, 03:25:03 AM

I would be mores than happy to join a demonstration to have Al Sharpton arrested for attempted incitement to riot. He should also be arrested for running his mouth while being stupid.

We expect this kind of behavior from Sharpton. It's what he does and what he is. What really bugs me is that MSNBC pays him to do it on TV!

45-70.gov · « **Reply #13 on:** March 31, 2012, 08:52:47 AM »

But, to Florida Congresswoman Federica Wilson, “this sweet young boy … was hunted down like a dog, shot on the street, and his killer is still at large.”

any voters in her district?

tobster · « **Reply #14 on:** March 31, 2012, 12:28:00 PM »

I think Pat Buchanan summed i up pretty well.

hillbill · « **Reply #15 on:** March 31, 2012, 12:48:00 PM »

al sharpton is a racist. thats obvious. would he be here if the perp had been black and the victim white?
we have wittness saying black fella punching white fella and banging his head off the ground and then trying to take his gun. we dont as yet know whole story. and prob never will. there is a reason zimmerman hasnt been arrested. dont know what it is but the local law enforcemant does. if it was cold blooded murder i assure yu he would be in jail.

The Hermit · « **Reply #16 on:** March 31, 2012, 03:18:53 PM »

Maybe this is the "opportunity" that Obama is waiting for to exercise his new "Executive Order" for control of "domestic terrorism". Civil rights suspended..etc. Goes right along with his unconstitutional mandatory insurance purchase requirement.

Sorry for the rant...

The Hermit

powderman · « **Reply #17 on:** March 31, 2012, 04:02:01 PM »

Anybody but me wonder why trayvons autopsy has not been publicized?? Toxicology report?? POWDERMAN.

tobster · « **Reply #18 on:** April 01, 2012, 08:06:11 AM »

I was under the impression an individual convicted of a domestic violence charge was prohibited from owning any firearm, let alone having a concealed carry for a handgun.

Conan The Librarian · « **Reply #19 on:** April 01, 2012, 09:45:37 AM »

Mcwooduck:

Crackers were farther north, and they still exist. It's a matter of heritage. They are proud of who they are. Crackers were the pioneering people of northern Florida. I think you're confusing Florida Crackers with the word crackers, which is a synonym for honky and a derogitory term for whites in general.

redboot612 · « **Reply #20 on:** April 01, 2012, 10:30:58 AM »

Sharpton, Jackson Jr, and Faracon are vultures...when something like this happens, they show up and bellower like an old bull and collect all the money that is taken up and then they leave!!! They in it for themselves!!!

Matt · « **Reply #21 on:** April 01, 2012, 10:50:45 AM »

Here is how I see it.

We have a man who murdered another. The boy was unarmed and shot in the back while running away. The laws of FL pertaining to self defense should never come into play as it was not self defense it was murder. You can not take it upon yourself to be judge, jury and executioner of an individual who is not threating your life or property. This whole think smells of vigilante justice with a hint of racism (Hispanic v Black ) thrown in.

It boggles my mind why in the year 2012 race still plays a huge part in our day to day lives. We have been programed by design to see everyone in groups of people and not as individuals. It is part of the Divide and Conquer strategy and has worked for a long time now. When I meet someone for the first time I do not look at the color of their skin, cloths, hair or any of those type things. In just a few minutes I can make a judgment call on the person and decide if I : Should keep it strictly business / Could hang out with this person / Need to stay the hell away. But I will not base my decision on race, religion, sexual orientation, fashion sense or any of that it will be based on talking to the person. I do myself tend to group people into 3 categories;

1) those that know
2) those that don't know but seek the information
3) those that just plain don't give a rats ass or want to.

I tend to stay away from the later of the 3 as those people and I are not like minded and therefore most likely will not share many if any common interests. But I do not put any less or more value on one category over another as I see everyone on an equal playing field where no one is 'Better" than the next and all laws apply to everyone equally.
OK rant over...
Now arrest the dude give him a fair trial and if found guilty carry out the sentence imposed.
As for those who are attempting to incite violence they should be put on trial for any deaths, injuries or damage that comes from it.

Matt

Conan The Librarian · « **Reply #22 on:** April 01, 2012, 11:16:47 AM »

Depending on the subject, i'm in all three of those categories.

saddlebum · « **Reply #23 on:** April 01, 2012, 11:19:21 AM »

Somebody needs to get their facts straight. Martin was shot in the chest, not in the back and unless Martin was running backwards, I don't think he was running for his life. Even the Sharpton lead protesters know that.

“We want an arrest. Shot in the chest,” protesters chanted as they made their way to the headquarters of the Sanford Police Department, which has overseen the case.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/we-want-an-arrest-shot-in-the-chest-protesters-march-in-florida-for-trayvon-martin/

That is the biggest part of the problem with this tragedy. Erroneous information being thrown around by the media and individuals that pay little or no attention to official police reports, 911 calls and eye witness accounts. In all the accounts and reports I've seen and heard, I have never heard of Martin being shot in the back while running away. The racist race baiters, (like Sharpton/Jackson), are doing what they always do, encluding distorting the truth for their agenda. Let the independent investigators do their job and if Zimmerman deserves punishment, he will get it. At this point, I can't imagine anyone trying to distort the facts in Zimmerman's favor with this much attention on the case. That would be suicide for an investigator.

saddlebum · « **Reply #24 on:** April 01, 2012, 11:24:40 AM »

Quote from: tobster on April 01, 2012, 08:06:11 AM

I was under the impression an individual convicted of a domestic violence charge was prohibited from owning any firearm, let alone having a concealed carry for a handgun.

Right or wrong, I heard the charges were dropped. Therefore no conviction.

powderman · « **Reply #25 on:** April 01, 2012, 02:42:33 PM »

Quote

Somebody needs to get their facts straight. Martin was shot in the chest, not in the back and unless Martin was running backwards, I don't think he was running for his life. Even the Sharpton lead protesters know that.

SADDLEBUM. I never read anything about being shot in the back either til Matt posted it. Good posts Sir. POWDERMAN.

Matt · « **Reply #26 on:** April 01, 2012, 03:43:05 PM »

I stand corrected on where he was shot as the story I read when it first broke was he was shot in the back. None the less there is still no cause for all that is going on or it being in the national news other than to create more division within the citizenry. Everyone who continues to make this an issue is only doing the bidding of those that wanted this in the media in the first place. OPEN YOUR BLEEPING EYES and maybe you will see through all the BS.

Matt

30-30man · « **Reply #27 on:** April 01, 2012, 04:07:12 PM »

Al Sharpton...That is about all I need to read. He is the biggest racist of them all. This whole issue should not even involve race, but the media and Al want something to do. Black people will never be where they want to be as a whole. They keep ignoring the problem and trying to rally behind a cause thinking it's the reason for their current condition. They can't get over the fact, that most whites refuse to pay for a crime, they didn't commit. The condition of the black family with men being the main problem needs to be addressed by the black community. Slavery was a sin of our ancestors and theirs. After all, their own people sold them into slavery, so every side was guilty. My family on both sides were dirt poor Irish farmers who came over here for a new life. We were too poor to buy shoes, much less slaves. We worked hard and raised our families. We didn't ask for help nor did we seek to be a victim in every problem that came along. I'm sick and tired of our society accepting racism from the black community towards whites and everyone is alright with it. They have many organizations, colleges, and media outlets that discriminate toward whites. (BET, ANCF, too many to list) They would riot if it we had the same opportunities. Why can't we all move on and call it what it is? A guy shot a kid after following him and getting into a fight.

powderman · « **Reply #28 on:** April 01, 2012, 04:37:52 PM »

Quote

None the less there is still no cause for all that is going on or it being in the national news other than to create more division within the citizenry.

MATT. I definitely agree with that, and if trayvon had been white none of this would be going on now. As it is the blacks and liberals are blowing this way out of proportion, even had a march and vigils in Lou. They are trying to make him out as a complete innocent, like a choir boy. POWDERMAN.

saddlebum · « **Reply #29 on:** April 01, 2012, 05:09:37 PM »

Quote from: Matt on April 01, 2012, 03:43:05 PM

I stand corrected on where he was shot as the story I read when it first broke was he was shot in the back. None the less there is still no cause for all that is going on or it being in the national news other than to create more division within the citizenry. Everyone who continues to make this an issue is only doing the bidding of those that wanted this in the media in the first place. OPEN YOUR BLEEPING EYES and maybe you will see through all the BS.

Matt

Fully agree! Your first post is a good example of the point your making. You read or heard that Martin was shot in the back while trying to escape. And thats what you repeated. I could have done the same thing. Thats how the "BS" gets perpetuated. This whole thing has been blown way out of proportion and turned into a racial issue by liberal media and race baiters. True, there are some unanswered questions about this incident. But it will all come out in the end because of all the attention it's getting now. It IS worth an independent investigation. But not all the racial outrage, IMO. Demanding that Zimmerman be arrested seems un-neccessary to me. He ain't going anywhere and the police would have already done that if they felt it warranted or neccessary. If the nonsense keeps up, he may have to go into protective custody.

I'm with you, Matt, when you say, "It boggles my mind why in the year 2012 race still plays a huge part in our day to day lives." It's my belief that most of America is over racism. The exception being small racist groups of all colors. Like the neo-nazi types and The New Black Panthers. Most people of all colors think these people are nuts. Even the original Black Panthers speak out against the NBP. It's different people with multiple agendas like the Sharptons and Jacksons and even the Marxists, that keep this racial crap stirred up for their own agendas. I'm sick of it! Before Obama, I never thought about racism. Now some jerk is always talking about it..........

As far as all the talk and outrage about profiling goes, that will not and should not stop. If I went for a walk in a black neighborhood at night wearing my King Ropes ball cap, Wranglers, boots, western shirt and a camo jacket, I guarantee I would be 'profiled' by the residents. If Martin wasn't doing anything wrong, he should have just reassured Zimmerman of that fact and they could have parted friends and both could relax and be alive today. Just saying. But the truth is we don't know all the facts yet and maybe never will. Maybe Zimmerman should go to jail. Nobody really knows for sure, except Zimmerman.