Author Topic: The Official Lesser of Two Evils List (Read 64030 times)

blind ear · « **Reply #330 on:** April 18, 2012, 03:33:57 AM »

Matt:
"I want to see if I can get a consensus on one issues: Who wants Obama Out of Office?"
-
How bad does it have to get people to rise up and rebell? Obama in office will get us to a worse position quicker.
Romney and the Republicans are getting us to that worse position at a slower more orchistrated pace, a progression that we might not be able to overcome.
This doesn't prevent a concensus.
-
Quote from BUGEYE:
"I've said for some time that we need to put the 2nd to use that the founders meant for it.
nothing else will change this country."

Bugeye is not alone. ear

45-70.gov · « **Reply #331 on:** April 18, 2012, 08:23:52 AM »

Quote from: Matt on April 17, 2012, 06:45:28 PM

I want to see if I can get a consensus on one issues: Who wants Obama Out of Office?

+ one for obumer out of office

MATT you ask it ...they are more likely to answer you than me

WHO WANTS 4 MORE YEARS OF OBUMER ??

AND WHO WANTS TO SEE ROMNEE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT ??

blind ear · « **Reply #332 on:** April 18, 2012, 02:08:45 PM »

Quote from: 45-70.gov on April 18, 2012, 08:23:52 AM

Quote from: Matt on April 17, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
I want to see if I can get a consensus on one issues: Who wants Obama Out of Office?

+ one for obumer out of office

MATT you ask it ...they are more likely to answer you than me

WHO WANTS 4 MORE YEARS OF OBUMER ??

AND WHO WANTS TO SEE ROMNEE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT ??

-
If Romney were elected, no change. For the 2016 election the choices would be Romney or Obama, no change. This no change could easily drag out 12 more years. What is the point? ear

Matt · « **Reply #333 on:** April 18, 2012, 02:59:28 PM »

OK, so it is clear that those who are posting to this thread WANT OBAMA OUT.

Now here are my next questions and I just need a yes or no answer for all three. Please do not go into a diatribe about one candidate or the other also Please do not preach one side or the other and Please note I said Please!

If Obama was not in the race at all would you still vote Romney ?
In your gut do you feel that Romney is the Best Possible Choice for the Office of President of those still running ( includes all parties ) ?
Is Romney your FIRST CHOICE ?

Cuts Crooked · « **Reply #334 on:** April 18, 2012, 03:12:46 PM »

no

no

no

Cabin4 · « **Reply #335 on:** April 18, 2012, 03:39:10 PM »

Unknown because who would have the job??
No
No

Ranch13 · « **Reply #336 on:** April 18, 2012, 03:58:13 PM »

1 need to know the other candidate
2. Maybe
3. No.

Lost Farmboy · « **Reply #337 on:** April 18, 2012, 04:24:58 PM »

No

No

No

Lost Farmboy · « **Reply #338 on:** April 18, 2012, 04:28:06 PM »

Quote from: Ranch13 on April 18, 2012, 03:29:57 AM

Quote from: Lost Farmboy on April 17, 2012, 09:45:04 PM
Quote from: Ranch13 on April 17, 2012, 05:12:47 PM

In the 1920's "sheeple" was a term coined by the National Socialist Party in Germany to describe people that would not vote for Hitler. In the 1930's they held Hitler as the only one that would bring pride back to Germany and bring the budget and economy back.....

Interesting signature line you got there Ranch13. Interesting because sheep and people are not German words. Looks like a clever way to compare Ron Paul to Hitler again. Another interesting comparison to Hitler is the same group of people that funded Hitlers rise to power funded Obama and now are funding Romney. One of the people funding Hitlers rise to power and his war effort was Prescott Bush.

Every time we elect a new president we lose more freedom. Democrats and republicans makes no difference.
Sorry there farmboy, but that is documented history from the 1920's. Check it out, it's all there in print, both in writings of the time period, newspapers etc...
The mere fact that there is likely noone alive nor has been for a decade or two that funded Hitlers rise to power, It's one heck of a stretch to say those same people are funding Obama or Romney.
It's also highly unlikely that at this time there are any major contributors/ backers to either campaign that are crossing over to the other as well.
The only way to stop the so called loss of freedom is for some of the internet political experts to get up take a shower put on some street clothes and go upstairs and tell their mother they are going out to make some new friends.

Sheep and people are still not German words. I can't read German, but I can read wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheeple

The term sheeple does not fit Ron Paul supporters in any way. They come from all parties, ages and think for themselves.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sheeple

45-70.gov · « **Reply #339 on:** April 19, 2012, 03:40:06 AM »

yes

no

no

I WILL DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO STOP A DEMOCRAT

Gary G · « **Reply #340 on:** April 19, 2012, 04:28:18 AM »

NO
NO
NO

BUGEYE · « **Reply #341 on:** April 19, 2012, 04:35:52 AM »

Quote from: Ranch13 on April 18, 2012, 03:58:13 PM

1 need to know the other candidate
2. Maybe
3. No.

what he said.

nw_hunter · « **Reply #342 on:** April 19, 2012, 09:23:28 AM »

Quote from: Matt on April 18, 2012, 02:59:28 PM

OK, so it is clear that those who are posting to this thread WANT OBAMA OUT.

Now here are my next questions and I just need a yes or no answer for all three. Please do not go into a diatribe about one candidate or the other also Please do not preach one side or the other and Please note I said Please!

If Obama was not in the race at all would you still vote Romney ?
In your gut do you feel that Romney is the Best Possible Choice for the Office of President of those still running ( includes all parties ) ?
Is Romney your FIRST CHOICE ?

NO,NO,NO

northkid · « **Reply #343 on:** April 19, 2012, 03:19:02 PM »

Quote from: 45-70.gov on April 18, 2012, 08:23:52 AM

Quote from: Matt on April 17, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
I want to see if I can get a consensus on one issues: Who wants Obama Out of Office?

+ one for obumer out of office

MATT you ask it ...they are more likely to answer you than me

WHO WANTS 4 MORE YEARS OF OBUMER ??

AND WHO WANTS TO SEE ROMNEE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT ??

WHO WANTS 4 MORE YEARS OF OBUMER ??

AND WHO WANTS TO 8 YEARS OF ROMNEE??

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #344 on:** April 19, 2012, 03:53:04 PM »

Matt,
I am going to assume that I do not get any practice guesses,so here we go......

If Obama was not in the race at all would you still vote Romney ?
Depends upon Demoncrap candidate, but most likely, no.

In your gut do you feel that Romney is the Best Possible Choice for the Office of President of those still running ( includes all parties ) ?
No.

Is Romney your FIRST CHOICE ?
No.

If Ocrapper gets four more years in office, we will have an onslaught against the 2A, 4/5/14A (possibly even 3A -- bet nobody thought about that one), increased debt, increased energy costs, staggering inflation, increased food costs, and possible riots by welfare parasites. All of this could potentially end in a shooting war. Remember the last time a man from Illinois was in the White House. However, Ocrapper is nowhere near as presidential as Lincoln was.

ST762

Matt · « **Reply #345 on:** April 19, 2012, 09:40:18 PM »

First let me say thanks to all of you who answered.

So now I have a Constitutional question if you guys don't mind.
Can you tell me what the Constitutional requirements are to hold the office of President?
Please again if you will no candidate comments in the responses.

Matt

Lost Farmboy · « **Reply #346 on:** April 19, 2012, 11:06:11 PM »

Must be 35 years old and born in America, but who in the government follows the constitution any more?

BUGEYE · « **Reply #347 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:55:03 AM »

http://americanhistory.about.com/od/uspresidents/f/presidential_requirements.htm

I think they're all here.

Ranch13 · « **Reply #348 on:** April 20, 2012, 02:53:40 AM »

Directly from the Constitution Article 2 section 1
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #349 on:** April 20, 2012, 03:35:26 AM »

it appears the democratic party has offered an illegal candidate

seems to be a lot of democrats in jail

2 illinois governors to start the list

what ever happend to norman shu?

northkid · « **Reply #350 on:** April 20, 2012, 03:40:22 AM »

Quote from: Matt on April 19, 2012, 09:40:18 PM

First let me say thanks to all of you who answered.

So now I have a Constitutional question if you guys don't mind.
Can you tell me what the Constitutional requirements are to hold the office of President?
Please again if you will no candidate comments in the responses.

Matt

Someone who knows what this is and can understand it.

northkid · « **Reply #351 on:** April 20, 2012, 03:43:39 AM »

Don't look like the Republicans are doing very well in the poll.

Strictly Republican Party 5 (20.8%)

Strictly Best Candidate for the Job (Reguardless of the Party) 19 (79.2%)

Ranch13 · « **Reply #352 on:** April 20, 2012, 03:48:07 AM »

Quote from: northkid on April 20, 2012, 03:43:39 AM

Don't look like the Republicans are doing very well in the poll.

Strictly Republican Party 5 (20.8%)

Strictly Best Candidate for the Job (Reguardless of the Party) 19 (79.2%)

Some of us didn't vote in the poll. Question is to broad, and the answers to narrow.

BUGEYE · « **Reply #353 on:** April 20, 2012, 03:52:41 AM »

Quote from: northkid on April 20, 2012, 03:43:39 AM

Don't look like the Republicans are doing very well in the poll.

Strictly Republican Party 5 (20.8%)

Strictly Best Candidate for the Job (Reguardless of the Party) 19 (79.2%)

most here are CONSERVATIVES not die hard republicans. most have said that Romney is not their first choice, but that obama must be removed.
GBO members are not the only voters.

Casull · « **Reply #354 on:** April 20, 2012, 08:41:47 AM »

Quote

Some of us didn't vote in the poll. Question is to broad, and the answers to narrow.

Bingo. I tend to avoid answering biased questions.

mcwoodduck · « **Reply #355 on:** April 20, 2012, 08:58:16 AM »

Quote from: northkid on April 20, 2012, 03:43:39 AM

Don't look like the Republicans are doing very well in the poll.

Strictly Republican Party 5 (20.8%)

Strictly Best Candidate for the Job (Reguardless of the Party) 19 (79.2%)

I did not answer because it it too broad.
Had there been a 3rd choice of.
Will vote for who can beat the Democrat. I would have voted.
The vote for the best candidate includes people who vote republican and not 3rd party and consider someone like Rhomney the best candidate and also for a few who would think Obama is the best candidate.
Your thinking that all of the votes for Best are for a 3rd party run is flawed.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #356 on:** April 20, 2012, 10:17:13 AM »

Quote from: BUGEYE on April 20, 2012, 03:52:41 AM

Quote from: northkid on April 20, 2012, 03:43:39 AM
Don't look like the Republicans are doing very well in the poll.

Strictly Republican Party 5 (20.8%)

Strictly Best Candidate for the Job (Reguardless of the Party) 19 (79.2%)
most here are CONSERVATIVES not die hard republicans. most have said that Romney is not their first choice, but that obama must be removed.
GBO members are not the only voters.

how can a CONSERVITIVE.....NOT vote against the democrat

has no one grasp the concept of getting it right in the primaries??

Cuts Crooked · « **Reply #357 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:03:18 PM »

Quote from: 45-70.gov on April 20, 2012, 10:17:13 AM

how can a CONSERVITIVE.....NOT vote against the democrat

has no one grasp the concept of getting it right in the primaries??

To the first question: Easy, voting for a socialist, gun grabber, baby killer is wrong whether he's a demo or a repub.

To the second question: Apparently not, because the repubs are running a socialist, gun grabbing, baby killer.

In an aside, I got a kick out of those who commented that they did not participate in the above polls because the choices were too narrow.

Obviously they feel that if the choices aren't what they want.....they shouldn't vote.

nw_hunter · « **Reply #358 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:04:49 PM »

how can a CONSERVITIVE.....NOT vote against the democrat

has no one grasp the concept of getting it right in the primaries??

Don't you mean......How can a Conservative( NOT )vote against a Liberal?
As both Romney and Obama are Liberals, A conservative vote is wasted on them.

Casull · « **Reply #359 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:23:16 PM »

Quote

In an aside, I got a kick out of those who commented that they did not participate in the above polls because the choices were too narrow. Obviously they feel that if the choices aren't what they want.....they shouldn't vote.

In a meaningless poll, yes. In an election for the most powerful man in the world, ABSOLUTELY NOT.