What has me perplexed is the Paul supporters here.
None of you have said that OBama is a threat to our liberties, our rights, or our way of life.
According to you Paul supporters, Obama is complete ploar opposite of Ron Paul and yet you are willing to allow him a second term?
And yes some of us may vote for Rhomney, some want him, some are willing to vote for him to get rid of Obama.
And much like the US used the USSR, complete polar opposites, to get rid of facism, and Japanese Imperialism. The Axis powers much bigger threats than the Soviets. The Soviet Union was later defeated by a Conservitive. Much like we can defeat Obama and then defeat the liberal wing of the Republican Party.
I and may here have said if Paul, no matter how distasteful, is able to win the nomination of the Republican Party I would vote for him to get rid of Obama as President and his power grab to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE AMERICA.
I understand that we are in he middle of a Campaign.
If on a scale of 1 to 10 1 being a Constitutionalist like Jefferson and a 10 being Obama on the far left Anti Amaerican.
You have Paul as a 3, Newt as a 4, Rhomney as a 5 or 6 and Obama as a 10. Any of the three on the right are better than Obama.