Author Topic: The Official Lesser of Two Evils List (Read 63934 times)

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #630 on:** June 05, 2012, 02:01:46 AM »

I do not like Romney myself, but will vote for him to keep Obama out. If Obama wins, we know who to blame, the libertarians, as much as I like the libertarians and vote that way in PRIMARY's, but the country will be in worse shape and may turn violent IF Obama gets back in. We can't afford more blame, tax, and spend.

Casull · « **Reply #631 on:** June 05, 2012, 04:56:35 AM »

Quote

I will get the screwing right along side everyone else whether romney or obrahma wins the election, the difference between the people who vote for romney while holding their noses and me, is that my screwing won't be consensual, and this may become a very important distinction.

That's where I disagree. If obama wins and you voted 3rd party, then your screwing will be MORE consensual than that of those of us who voted for Romney. Ours will NOT be consenual (we tried).

osokusmc · « **Reply #632 on:** June 05, 2012, 06:50:54 AM »

Quote from: Casull on June 05, 2012, 04:56:35 AM

Quote
I will get the screwing right along side everyone else whether romney or obrahma wins the election, the difference between the people who vote for romney while holding their noses and me, is that my screwing won't be consensual, and this may become a very important distinction.

That's where I disagree. If obama wins and you voted 3rd party, then your screwing will be MORE consensual than that of those of us who voted for Romney. Ours will NOT be consenual (we tried).

That logic is akin to asking a woman, which of the two rapists would you least like to have rape you, and by choosing, you are automatically consenting to the other one raping you. Obrahma is terrible, romney isn't much better, and if romney wins with your vote, you have consented to a man who scores a D- from GOA among other things. I don't consent to either obrahma or romney. If obrahma wins it will be because of the people who cast their vote for him, and if you're intent on spreading blame, pitch a little on the GOP for losing their way and putting the likes of mccain and romney in front.

Gary G · « **Reply #633 on:** June 05, 2012, 08:12:15 AM »

If Romney is elected:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qoq9jIjpNM&feature=player_embedded

If Obama is elected:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qoq9jIjpNM&feature=player_embedded

What if the government had their staged event (the election) and nobody showed up?

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #634 on:** June 05, 2012, 09:07:27 AM »

More Obama than Romney. I hold the opinion that Romney will work with Congress to reform the taxcode and create a favorable atmosphere for employers. I have no problem with cutting off the parasites to save some money; tha parasites can go out and get jobs -- even if that means prostitution in a Nevada brothel.

ST762

Casull · « **Reply #635 on:** June 05, 2012, 09:27:29 AM »

Quote

That logic is akin to asking a woman, which of the two rapists would you least like to have rape you, and by choosing, you are automatically consenting to the other one raping you.

Oh my gosh, I've been hamstrung.

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #636 on:** June 05, 2012, 10:22:19 AM »

Quote from: osokusmc on June 05, 2012, 06:50:54 AM

Quote from: Casull on June 05, 2012, 04:56:35 AM
Quote
I will get the screwing right along side everyone else whether romney or obrahma wins the election, the difference between the people who vote for romney while holding their noses and me, is that my screwing won't be consensual, and this may become a very important distinction.

That's where I disagree. If obama wins and you voted 3rd party, then your screwing will be MORE consensual than that of those of us who voted for Romney. Ours will NOT be consenual (we tried).

That logic is akin to asking a woman, which of the two rapists would you least like to have rape you, and by choosing, you are automatically consenting to the other one raping you. Obrahma is terrible, romney isn't much better, and if romney wins with your vote, you have consented to a man who scores a D- from GOA among other things. I don't consent to either obrahma or romney. If obrahma wins it will be because of the people who cast their vote for him, and if you're intent on spreading blame, pitch a little on the GOP for losing their way and putting the likes of mccain and romney in front.

osokusmc,

A D- from GOA does not do squat for my wallet. An Obama victory screws me in three ways -- taxes go up, medical insurance goes up, and any potential retirement is almost for naught. And I am not alone. Any employed person will suffer the same fate.

Using your logic of the rapist, my vote is to fight off the rapist Obama. I will NOT be forcibly screwed....you can believe that will definitely happen under Komissar Obama.

Yes, a vote for door #3 [whoever else] is a back-door vote for door #1 [Obama the Destroyer].

ST762

Doublebass73 · « **Reply #637 on:** June 05, 2012, 12:23:22 PM »

Quote from: Dixie Dude on June 05, 2012, 02:01:46 AM

I do not like Romney myself, but will vote for him to keep Obama out. If Obama wins, we know who to blame, the libertarians, as much as I like the libertarians and vote that way in PRIMARY's, but the country will be in worse shape and may turn violent IF Obama gets back in. We can't afford more blame, tax, and spend.

So you're willing to BLAME Libertarians for supporting their candidate rather than voting for your liberal Republican candidate because we can't afford any more BLAME, tax and spend (which BTW your liberal Republican candidate has quite a history of).

You sound like you have something in common with Obama.

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #638 on:** June 05, 2012, 01:25:35 PM »

Quote from: Doublebass73 on June 05, 2012, 12:23:22 PM

Quote from: Dixie Dude on June 05, 2012, 02:01:46 AM
I do not like Romney myself, but will vote for him to keep Obama out. If Obama wins, we know who to blame, the libertarians, as much as I like the libertarians and vote that way in PRIMARY's, but the country will be in worse shape and may turn violent IF Obama gets back in. We can't afford more blame, tax, and spend.

So you're willing to BLAME Libertarians for supporting their candidate rather than voting for your liberal Republican candidate because we can't afford any more BLAME, tax and spend (which BTW your liberal Republican candidate has quite a history of).

You sound like you have something in common with Obama.

Under Romney, the state debt went from $48M to $57M, only nine million in four years. Under Obama, the national date went from $9T to $16.5T, in three years. Obama will also preside over the largest tax hike in American history.

So, let me see......Romney with $9M, or Ocrapper with $7.5T. Easy choice between the two.

ST762

osokusmc · « **Reply #639 on:** June 05, 2012, 01:34:11 PM »

Quote from: SwampThing762 on June 05, 2012, 10:22:19 AM

Quote from: osokusmc on June 05, 2012, 06:50:54 AM
Quote from: Casull on June 05, 2012, 04:56:35 AM
Quote
I will get the screwing right along side everyone else whether romney or obrahma wins the election, the difference between the people who vote for romney while holding their noses and me, is that my screwing won't be consensual, and this may become a very important distinction.

That's where I disagree. If obama wins and you voted 3rd party, then your screwing will be MORE consensual than that of those of us who voted for Romney. Ours will NOT be consenual (we tried).

That logic is akin to asking a woman, which of the two rapists would you least like to have rape you, and by choosing, you are automatically consenting to the other one raping you. Obrahma is terrible, romney isn't much better, and if romney wins with your vote, you have consented to a man who scores a D- from GOA among other things. I don't consent to either obrahma or romney. If obrahma wins it will be because of the people who cast their vote for him, and if you're intent on spreading blame, pitch a little on the GOP for losing their way and putting the likes of mccain and romney in front.

osokusmc,

A D- from GOA does not do squat for my wallet. An Obama victory screws me in three ways -- taxes go up, medical insurance goes up, and any potential retirement is almost for naught. And I am not alone. Any employed person will suffer the same fate.

Using your logic of the rapist, my vote is to fight off the rapist Obama. I will NOT be forcibly screwed....you can believe that will definitely happen under Komissar Obama.

Yes, a vote for door #3 [whoever else] is a back-door vote for door #1 [Obama the Destroyer].

ST762

You speak as if taxes, medical insurance costs, and retirement savings weren't in trouble before the halfrican was elected. Remember the reason he was elected in the first place, the GOP ran McCain as the solution for Americas future. Ron Paul would've beat obrahma three ways to Sunday in '08 if only the republicans would've had a little confidence in their own ability to operate in a free economy. As long as we have the federal reserve system, fractional reserve banking and fiat currency, the end game is that we'll lose everything our parents left us and anything we've acquired on our own. As far as the second, a D- isn't far enough above an F to merit any serious consideration. On most other issues the degree of separation is about what it is on the second.

Doublebass73 · « **Reply #640 on:** June 05, 2012, 01:48:07 PM »

Quote

Under Romney, the state debt went from $48M to $57M, only nine million in four years. Under Obama, the national date went from $9T to $16.5T, in three years. Obama will also preside over the largest tax hike in American history.

So, let me see......Romney with $9M, or Ocrapper with $7.5T. Easy choice between the two.

ST762

That's fine, it's your right to vote the lesser of 2 evils. I choose to vote for neither because they are both liberals. I will vote Libertarian, that way you guys can blame me when Obama gets re-elected instead of blaming the Republican party and its voters for nominating the most liberal Republican candidate in recent history.

Casull · « **Reply #641 on:** June 05, 2012, 01:51:47 PM »

Quote

Ron Paul would've beat obrahma three ways to Sunday in '08

Yeah, right. That's just delusional.

osokusmc · « **Reply #642 on:** June 05, 2012, 02:22:16 PM »

Quote from: Casull on June 05, 2012, 01:51:47 PM

Quote
Ron Paul would've beat obrahma three ways to Sunday in '08

Yeah, right. That's just delusional.

OK, so I am about that, what about the rest of what I said?

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #643 on:** June 05, 2012, 02:36:28 PM »

osokusmc,

The past is the past. You can't change that. You can, however, exert some influence over the future. My immediate concerns are all economic, a GOA D- rating means little to me; especially since I am not a member, nor do I care to be.

As to Ron Paul, I liked his fiscal ideas, but many of his other ideas I knew were too radical to gain any widespread acceptance. In debates, Obama would destroy RP. I respect the man, but he just did not have much of a chance, despite the media snubbing the Texas Congressman.

As to the characterization of Obama, it was not necessary to make the racist mark of the "halfrican". To me, racist remarks show very poor taste.

ST762

Cabin4 · « **Reply #644 on:** June 05, 2012, 05:16:01 PM »

I hate obama, the halfrican.

osokusmc · « **Reply #645 on:** June 05, 2012, 06:24:03 PM »

Quote from: SwampThing762 on June 05, 2012, 02:36:28 PM

osokusmc,

The past is the past. You can't change that. You can, however, exert some influence over the future. My immediate concerns are all economic, a GOA D- rating means little to me; especially since I am not a member, nor do I care to be.

As to Ron Paul, I liked his fiscal ideas, but many of his other ideas I knew were too radical to gain any widespread acceptance. In debates, Obama would destroy RP. I respect the man, but he just did not have much of a chance, despite the media snubbing the Texas Congressman.

As to the characterization of Obama, it was not necessary to make the racist mark of the "halfrican". To me, racist remarks show very poor taste.

ST762

African isn't a race. If your daddy is African and your mother isn't, you're halfrican. Obrahma doesn't even contest that he's halfrican.

kinslayer1965 · « **Reply #646 on:** August 29, 2012, 10:52:24 AM »

I will be voting for Romney. There is a laundry list of things I don't like about him but the list if far shorter for him than Obama.

I wonder what the RP supporters would be saying if the table were turned and RP had the nomination and we refused to throw our support behind him because our guy lost. They would rightfully be saying we just handed obama four more years.

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #647 on:** August 29, 2012, 02:52:34 PM »

kinslayer,

Well said, sir. You evoke the opinion of a great many people in our nation. However, too many people choose not to see the true dangers of a fractured front against the Obamination. Those people may truly be the arbiters of the destruction of the American experience, whether as willing collaborators or as uncooperative intransigents.

ST762

mcwoodduck · « **Reply #648 on:** August 29, 2012, 05:33:55 PM »

For all of you that are going to vote for Obama because you think he is for the little guy for the poor.
He is he is for making more of each.
If you raise taxes, you end up raising prices. Some items you can not raise prices on and then companies have a few choices, cut labor, find cheaper sources of labor, or find cheaper componets.
While you may not think a millionaire (according to Obama Biden and Gore it is anyone making 250K a year- math wizz) would be hurt by an added tax on them and they probably would not be, but it will hurt the restaraunts, wait staff, kitchen staff, and other service industries. Sure they will still eat out but will order a $50 bottle of wine rather than a $100 and the wait staff gets a lower tip. Hurting the little guy. At the same time prices fo the things the little guy needs go up and the lower wages buy even less.
Now as demand for goods goes down, so do profits and that lessens the amount of taxes that are collected. At the same time with fewer items being able to be purchesed due to higher prices fewer people are needed to service the customers.
Either Obama is stupid and does not understand the basics of economics ro he is evil and understands what he is doing.
If Stupid he needs to go, if Evil he really needs to go!

SwampThing762 · « **Reply #649 on:** August 29, 2012, 05:45:09 PM »

mccwoodduck,

Obama is evil....pure and simple. Yes, he should go!

ST762

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #650 on:** September 04, 2012, 12:46:33 AM »

I am basically Libertarian. I voted for Paul in the primary. I have to be pragmatic. I will vote for Romney over Obama. Romney will get the economy going if he can get congress to go along with most of his proposals. Getting rid of Obamacare and getting the excessive regulations off small business is a start. Getting drilling, pipeline constrution, and coal mining back in operation will also help cut the unemployment. Romney knows once the economy is back on solid footing, the tax revenue goes up, which will close the gap on the deficit. Also cutting stuff like Obamacare and spending on things not needed will also help close the gap. Lowering taxes on corporations will help keep a lot of them from going overseas and may bring some back. Like Clinton said to Bush Sr. "Its the economy stupid".

Every politician isn't perfect. I would rather have a "D" student in charge than an "F" student. At least something is done right.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #651 on:** September 04, 2012, 01:36:13 PM »

the next president will work with those in his own party

even if [it ain't gonna happen] a libertarian got elected,,,,no one would work with him
maybe this IS a good thing....but its not going to hppen anyway

the 2 possible winners have poor track record
but WILL work with those in his party

now that we have had the party conventions
look at the part platforms

republicans have strengthened 2nd amendment support

democrat platform calls for ''common sense regulation''
''assault weapons ban''

justme · « **Reply #652 on:** September 10, 2012, 03:59:31 PM »

Romney is the only logical choice if you have a bit of education.....

BUGEYE · « **Reply #653 on:** September 11, 2012, 12:23:46 AM »

Quote from: Dixie Dude on September 04, 2012, 12:46:33 AM

I am basically Libertarian. I voted for Paul in the primary. I have to be pragmatic. I will vote for Romney over Obama.

this shows that you are a THINKING libertarian. you're on my list of Patriots from GBO.

mcwoodduck · « **Reply #654 on:** September 30, 2012, 06:51:52 PM »

What gets me is the Liberals who all have very differnt adgendas all are bigger government will band together to defeat the conservitives. They will use the media to define us and meline us, use prime time shows to make fun of us and I see here that we as conservitives will not do what is needed to defeat the 10% hardcore liberals that swing the 30% of the sheep to thier cause.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #655 on:** October 01, 2012, 04:20:13 AM »

liberals are...''collectivist''
sorta like the ''borg'' on star trek
liberals speak and think in ''first person plural''.........WE and OUR

THEY VOTE AS A BLOCK

WE [now i am speaking first person plural] are INDIVIDUALIST

so we don't vote as a block
some choose the best man
others choose by gun rights...[that be me]
others based on economic considerations
others on religion
our vote is splintered and their ''voting block'' crushes us

there are only 2 choices in the general election
should have gotten involved in the primaries

nw_hunter · « **Reply #656 on:** October 07, 2012, 03:47:36 AM »

Quote from: 45-70.gov on October 01, 2012, 04:20:13 AM

liberals are...''collectivist''
sorta like the ''borg'' on star trek
liberals speak and think in ''first person plural''.........WE and OUR

THEY VOTE AS A BLOCK

WE [now i am speaking first person plural] are INDIVIDUALIST

so we don't vote as a block
some choose the best man
others choose by gun rights...[that be me]
others based on economic considerations
others on religion
our vote is splintered and their ''voting block'' crushes us

there are only 2 choices in the general election
should have gotten involved in the primaries

They Vote As A Block describes BOTH parties!Most voters are party line voters. That is the reason for the mess we are in.

I just participated in a local county wide poll and being a Blue collar community, it is going as I thought it would. Obama 36%........Romney 44%. The voters that think for themselves and want real change (NOT) more BS as usual, are the independent or third party voters (Anyone but those two) 14%. Not voting has come in with 5%. When the 14% becomes bigger than the first two, we will start to see change for the better.............For now it's business BULL as usual.

With the internet to find truth in politics, more are becoming informed, but it will take time and a new generation to do it IMO!

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #657 on:** October 07, 2012, 05:08:08 AM »

Liberals are colectivists. Blacks in the south vote as a block. 90% vote Democrat. Almost always all the time. Same with most communists. Hispanics so far have not.

45-70.gov · « **Reply #658 on:** October 07, 2012, 05:37:26 AM »

Quote from: nw_hunter on October 07, 2012, 03:47:36 AM

Quote from: 45-70.gov on October 01, 2012, 04:20:13 AM
liberals are...''collectivist''
sorta like the ''borg'' on star trek
liberals speak and think in ''first person plural''.........WE and OUR

THEY VOTE AS A BLOCK

WE [now i am speaking first person plural] are INDIVIDUALIST

so we don't vote as a block
some choose the best man
others choose by gun rights...[that be me]
others based on economic considerations
others on religion
our vote is splintered and their ''voting block'' crushes us

there are only 2 choices in the general election
should have gotten involved in the primaries

They Vote As A Block describes BOTH parties!Most voters are party line voters. That is the reason for the mess we are in.

I just participated in a local county wide poll and being a Blue collar community, it is going as I thought it would. Obama 36%........Romney 44%. The voters that think for themselves and want real change (NOT) more BS as usual, are the independent or third party voters (Anyone but those two) 14%. Not voting has come in with 5%. When the 14% becomes bigger than the first two, we will start to see change for the better.............For now it's business BULL as usual.

With the internet to find truth in politics, more are becoming informed, but it will take time and a new generation to do it IMO!

apathy during the primaries gave us the choices we have in the general election

name just ONE person in a third party that got JUST ONE electoral vote!

nw_hunter · « **Reply #659 on:** October 08, 2012, 05:20:12 AM »

Still not too late to vote for REAL change and tell the establishment to kiss off!
Two other candidates have attained ballot access sufficient enough to mathematically win the election by a majority of the electoral college,[/size] former New Mexico Governor [/size]Gary Johnson[/color][/size] the Libertarian Party nominee[/size] and [/size]Jill Stein[/color][/size], the Green Party nominee.

[/size]I would think most who love the Constitution would exclude Jill, but even she would probably be better for one term than Miff or Biff.
[/size]Just step up to the plate and for once tell the people who think they control the sheeple to to kiss your lower cheeks

Some of us will do it. Those who now think for themselves. Join the club!