Author Topic: Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!  (Read 434 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rex in OTZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!
« on: May 18, 2012, 07:01:08 AM »
Incandescent light bulbs were slated to be phased out in the U.S. beginning January 2012.
 Incandescent lamps are only a single facit of this Law.
 
The 2007 bill followed another major piece of energy legislation,
 
 The Energy Policy Act of 2005.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005
Signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005

 
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Independence_and_Security_Act_of_2007
Signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 19, 2007
 
The stated purpose of the act is “to move the United States toward greater energy independence and security, to increase the production of clean renewable fuels, to protect consumers, to increase the efficiency of products, buildings, and vehicles, to promote research on and deploy greenhouse gas capture and storage options, and to improve the energy performance of the Federal Government, and for other purposes.”.
 
 
Title III: Energy Savings Though Improved Standards for Appliance and Lighting
    Incandescent light bulbs were slated to be phased out in the U.S. beginning January 2012. Because regulating appliance and equipment efficiency standards has been proven to save energy, Title III contains standards for ten appliances and equipment: residential boilers, clothes dryers, room air conditioners, clothes washers, residential water heaters, dishwashers, kitchen stoves ovens, microwave ovens, and dehumidifiers. The only other previous national efficiency standards on products were made in 1987, 1988, 1995 and 2005 .
  A. Appliance Energy Efficiency
 
  • New efficiency standards for external power supplies, in-home appliances, electric motors, residential boilers, and heating and air conditioning equipment.
B. Lighting Energy Efficiency
  • Requires roughly 25 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs, phased in from 2012 through 2014. This effectively bans the manufacturing and importing of most current incandescent light bulbs.
  • Various specialty bulbs, including appliance bulbs, "rough service" bulbs, colored lights, plant lights, and 3-way bulbs, are exempt from these requirements as well as light bulbs currently less than 40 watts or more than 150 watts. This exempts stage lighting and Malibu lighting which falls outside this range although Malibu installations with more than 8 bulbs fall within the range and stage lighting is generally thousands of watts, far more than any home installation.
  • Requires roughly 200 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs, or similar energy savings, by 2020.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009
Signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009

Offline lakota

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2012, 09:05:10 AM »
Brought to you by a congress full of worthless arrogant liberal democrats and signed into law by a worthless arrogant liberal republican president. Hooray worthless arrogant liberals! Thank god they are here to save me from myself!
Hi NSA! Can you see how many fingers I am holding up?

Offline guzzijohn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3037
Re: Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2012, 09:35:14 AM »
Quote from lakota:
"Brought to you by a congress full of worthless arrogant liberal democrats and signed into law by a worthless arrogant liberal republican president. Hooray worthless arrogant liberals! Thank god they are here to save me from myself!"


It would be my guess that similar statements were made by many conservatives in the 70s when the regs really started tightening up on auto pollution. I don't know about some of you here, but when I was a kid and we vacationed in Colorado from Kansas you could see where Denver was from over 60 miles away from the yellow/brown cloud hanging over it. In the last couple of decades I know longer see that cloud, just the city and the mountains. If some conservatives had had their way that cloud would probably now meet the one from Wichita by now. Is that how we want to live?
GuzziJohn

Offline r29l20

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (26)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2012, 10:37:18 AM »
Just some intresting info, Edisons first light bulb is still going strong. Cool huh. :)

Offline lakota

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bye Bye Incandescent light bulbs!
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2012, 10:59:10 AM »
Quote from lakota:
"Brought to you by a congress full of worthless arrogant liberal democrats and signed into law by a worthless arrogant liberal republican president. Hooray worthless arrogant liberals! Thank god they are here to save me from myself!"


It would be my guess that similar statements were made by many conservatives in the 70s when the regs really started tightening up on auto pollution. I don't know about some of you here, but when I was a kid and we vacationed in Colorado from Kansas you could see where Denver was from over 60 miles away from the yellow/brown cloud hanging over it. In the last couple of decades I know longer see that cloud, just the city and the mountains. If some conservatives had had their way that cloud would probably now meet the one from Wichita by now. Is that how we want to live?
GuzziJohn

Now instead of incandecent light bulbs we will have a water supply contaminated by mercury from all of the chinese garbage CFL's going into landfills. We wont be able to drink but at least we will have 4 EPA stars while we are dying from dehydration!
Hi NSA! Can you see how many fingers I am holding up?

Offline Rex in OTZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
Its not all about Lightbulbs! Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2012, 12:22:42 PM »
After further amendments and negotiation between the House and Senate, a revised bill passed both houses on December 18, 2007 and President Bush, a Republican, signed it into law on December 19, 2007 in response to his "Twenty in Ten" challenge to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years.
 
The bill originally sought to cut subsidies to the petroleum industry in order to promote petroleum independence and different forms of alternative energy. These tax changes were ultimately dropped after opposition in the Senate, and the final bill focused on automobile fuel economy, development of biofuels, and energy efficiency in public buildings and lighting.
 
Title I-Energy Security Through Improved Vehicle Fuel Economy
Title I contains the first increase in fuel economy standards for passenger cars since 1975, and the establishment of the first efficiency standard for medium-duty and heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In the year 2020, it is estimated to save Americans a total of $22 billion and have a significant reduction in emissions equivalent to removing 28 million cars from the road. Title I is responsible for 60% of the estimated energy savings of the bill.
 
A. Increased Corporate Average Fuel Economy
 
  • Manufacturers must meet the average fuel economy standard of 27.5 miles per gallon or come within within 92% of the standard for a given model year.
  • Development of standards for commercial medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicles.
  • Manufacturers can receive credit in one vehicle class if it exceeds the CAFE standards, allowing them make up for another vehicle class that may be below standards. Credits can also be exchanged between manufacturers.
B. Improved Vehicle Technology C. Federal Vehicle Fleets
  • New conservation requirements for federal vehicle fleets.
  • Federal agencies cannot use light-duty or medium-duty passenger vehicles that do not meet the new low greenhouse emission standards.
  • Using 2005 as a baseline, by 2015 Federal agencies must reduce petroleum consumption by 20% and increase the use of annual alternative fuel by 10% yearly.
Title II: Energy Security Through Increased Production of Biofuels
Title III: Energy Savings Though Improved Standards for Appliance and Lighting
Title IV: Energy Savings in Buildings and Industry
 
Other Provisions
 
  • Taxpayer funding of research and development of solar energy, geothermal energy, and marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy technologies.
  • Expanded federal research on carbon sequestration technologies.
  • Green jobs - creation of a training program for "Energy efficiency and renewable energy workers".
  • Energy transportation and infrastructure. New initiatives for highway, sea and railroad infrastructure. Creation of the Office of Climate Change and Environment in the Department of Transportation.
  • Small business energy programs, offering small businesses loans toward energy efficiency improvements.
  • Smart grid - modernization of the electricity grid to improve reliability and efficiency.
  • Pool safety - new federal standards for drain covers and pool barriers.
  • Lupus - A consideration not included in the bill was an exclusion for people who have UV sensitivity that can be triggered by the higher UV radiation of the CF's.
Sounds like the Koyoto protocall is coming home to roost?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koyoto_protocol
 
Under the Protocol, 37 countries ("Annex I countries") commit themselves to a reduction of four greenhouse gases (GHG) (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulphur hexafluoride) and two groups of gases (hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons) produced by them, and all member countries give general commitments. At negotiations, Annex I countries (including the US) collectively agreed to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2% on average for the period 2008-2012. This reduction is relative to their annual emissions in a base year, usually 1990. Since the US has not ratified the treaty, the collective emissions reduction of Annex I Kyoto countries falls from 5.2% to 4.2% below base year
 
North America
 
  • Canada: emissions trading in Alberta, Canada, which started in 2007. This is run by the Government of Alberta.
  • United States:
    • the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which started in 2009. This scheme caps emissions from power generation in ten north-eastern US states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont).
    • emissions trading in California, which is planned to start in 2012.
  • the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), which is planned to start in 2012. This is a collective ETS agreed between 11 US states and Canadian provinces.

Did you know that 2 degree increase in surface temprature was noted in North America the time of the Post 911 bombing NO Fly Restrictions, the scientific community had discussed this to no end both for and aginst, airbourne pollutants that filter the suns rays since there were none (because of the groundings) the surface temprature rose accordingly because the clearing off of Smog and airbourne dust generated by general aviation.