Author Topic: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?  (Read 6817 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #30 on: June 10, 2012, 04:43:32 AM »
Few are less attractive than the Savage 99.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline muznut 54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 709
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #31 on: June 10, 2012, 04:47:20 AM »
The 30-40 Krag came three years before the 30-30 and twenty eight years before the 300 savage and has about the same power as the 300 savage. 

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #32 on: June 10, 2012, 02:31:52 PM »
Bingo,
 
  The answer to your question is easy.  The government went to bolt actions for their military rifles, instead of lever actions, because the bayonet was still the Queen of the Battlefield.  Nobody would want to be in a bayonet fight if they had to have their fingers shoved through the lever of a rifle.
 
  The rifle with bayonet was regarded as both a shooting device, and a pike.
 
Manny
 
 

Offline Cheesehead

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3282
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #33 on: June 10, 2012, 03:21:00 PM »
The Krag rifle is unique and interesting. I would like to have one for a deer rifle.

Cheese

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdL_PROUKlE&feature=plcp

This video explains many things.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance.

Offline Bingo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #34 on: June 11, 2012, 09:02:38 AM »
Hey Cheesehead I have one here that is for sale. It is a full rifle not a carbine. Untouched military issue with bayonett and Collins green bone machetti. It is a 1903 and was a Philapine issue in ww2. Although it is worth more as a collectors iten than a deer rifle. My friends father brought it home after the war and I told her I would try to sell it for her.

Offline westkraut

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 2
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2012, 06:57:45 PM »
No drill peep mounts for Krags are hard to find (at least in Canada....as are the Krags) and are selling on eBay for $150 or more.  Williams makes new receiver mount (FP-Krag)  that requires 2 drilled holes to the right side of the receiver for half that price.  S&K makes a no drill scope mount ($140) that fits (sometimes loosely) the US and Norwegian Krags with some removal of wood required but most scopes will interfere with use of the Krag safety.  Raising the scope with the S&K mount is costly and no guarantee that the mount will not move under recoil.  I am scoping one Norwegian Krag in 6.5x54 Mannlicher Schoenauer and mounting peep sights on the 30/40 carbine for shorter range moose hunting.  Whether the Krag 30/40 is better or equal to the Savage 300 is academic as I think the sighting systems are more important than minor differences in the ballistics of these two calibers.  I personally prefer the Krags and usually use them in single shot mode when hunting.....nice history with them and finely made rifles!

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2012, 07:54:09 AM »
Always wanted a Krag for sporter puposes. Bought one of the Browning repo 1895 in the Krag also some beat up sporters. Seems like I can't keep some things. I sat down and figured to get what I wanted,I was gonna have to spend considerable cash and time. I located a trash action and over the time span of ten years I located the parts I needed. My krag has a slightly used barrel from a Browning B-78 machined to fit the action. A banded Redfield front sight and banded swing swivel attachment. I also fitted an incorrect Lyman peep sight,modified to fit. I machined the magazine box on the left side to fit inside the stock to alleviate that weak part of the wood. The loading gate side is unmodified.Spent way to much cash,but I have an ideal deer and elk rifle for Arizona here. Included is some pics. Not the best quality.

Offline 1armoured

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #37 on: June 26, 2012, 12:29:07 PM »
Looks great, and obviously a labor of love !


Good on you for sticking with the project,
and,
thanks for sharing.


cheers,
SS

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #38 on: June 26, 2012, 04:52:36 PM »
Looks great, and obviously a labor of love !


Good on you for sticking with the project,
and,
thanks for sharing.


cheers,
SS
I got a thing for schnabels and banded front sling swivels. I hate swivels on the front of the stock.

Offline 1armoured

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #39 on: June 26, 2012, 05:26:02 PM »
Yeah, me too.
I've 4 rifles with schnabels,wundhammer palm swells, and white line spacing, (but all with swivels in the stock fronts  :( )


cheers,
SS

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #40 on: July 19, 2012, 11:05:04 AM »

     Personally, I love the way the Krag looks.  Its so, . . . end of the 19th Century, just before the dawn of the Guilded Age.   Utilitarian in design, but gracefully executed.   [...]  Like something your great great grandfather would come up with in his workshop.  You can almost imagine the old U.S. Cavalrymen handing over their Trapdoor Springfields for their new Krags.  They must have thought them miraculous!
 
Mannyrock

I like the way you see and describe things regards the Krag during the age of transition. It was quite elegant in its side access under receiver charging system as a solution to the pointy bullet tube magazine problem... you just flip open the cover, roll 4 or 5 rounds over your finger tips into the magazine, close the cover and yer-good-ta-go. The Savage's solution was classic as well especially for a lever-gun with it's inside receiver top charged rotary magazine.

These two "miraculous" designs, the 1892-'99 Krag-Jorgensen and the 1895-'99 lever action Savage, were considered state of the art in the 1890s and have much more in common in spite of the functional differences in their designs. The Savage was submitted to the 1895 arms board for consideration in competition with the Krag. It was originally chambered in .30-US, (30/40 Krag) with an 8 round rotary magazine.

JTCoyoté

Offline Bingo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #41 on: July 19, 2012, 01:31:10 PM »
  Yea, but if you go back to the original post 30-40 Kraig matching the 300 Savage I would still beg to differ. If you had both a 308 and a 300 Savage in your hand you would notice that they are almost identical. The 300 Sav. just has flater shoulders making it a 308 AI.
  My son droped a deer at 280 yrds. with his savage last year. The deer traveled 20 feet before piling up. Three years ago my brother shot a buck from the same stand at 281 yrds and shot it in the head. ( that was all he could see and the only shot he had) Same gun!
  I wouldn't want to try shots like that with a 30-40 Kraig. 

Offline joe 1951

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #42 on: July 19, 2012, 04:42:32 PM »
    Have never shot a 30-40 krag but have heard about it all my life.Begain my hunting with a 7x57 cutdoun k98.Now have Probly 8 rifles from .17 to.243 .270short mag 7mm ultamg and a 7x57. Waiting for my 1896 springfield 30-40 krag to get here.           It will join my marlin 32-20 shot some and fondiler a lot!Still locking for a rem.1100 in 28ga. and 410 that i can afford they will joim my 12g 16ga and 20 ga.                   y'll have a goodin  Joe 8)

Offline Barstooler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #43 on: July 19, 2012, 04:43:12 PM »
  Yea, but if you go back to the original post 30-40 Kraig matching the 300 Savage I would still beg to differ. If you had both a 308 and a 300 Savage in your hand you would notice that they are almost identical. The 300 Sav. just has flater shoulders making it a 308 AI.
  My son droped a deer at 280 yrds. with his savage last year. The deer traveled 20 feet before piling up. Three years ago my brother shot a buck from the same stand at 281 yrds and shot it in the head. ( that was all he could see and the only shot he had) Same gun!
  I wouldn't want to try shots like that with a 30-40 Kraig.

First (general question) -  why in hell would anyone not try a 280 yard shot with a Krag.  The Krag was used for years in 1000 yard competition.  Mine shoots 1.5 MOA with a peep sight and 64-year old eyes.
 
Second (specific question) - since you obviously know nothing about the Krag because you can not even spell the name correctly ("Krag" vs "Kraig") why the hell are you even injecting your worthless $0.02 opinion to this thread?  Have you ever owned or shot a 30-40 Krag?
 
Sorry to bust your gonads, but it is just my nature when I have had a good single malt scotch and a good cigar.
 
Barstooler
Beverage of Choice -  Jeremiah Weed
Weapon of Choice  -  30 Mike Mike Gatlin Gun

Offline tdoor

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #44 on: July 20, 2012, 03:04:49 AM »
  Yea, but if you go back to the original post 30-40 Kraig matching the 300 Savage I would still beg to differ. If you had both a 308 and a 300 Savage in your hand you would notice that they are almost identical. The 300 Sav. just has flater shoulders making it a 308 AI.
  My son droped a deer at 280 yrds. with his savage last year. The deer traveled 20 feet before piling up. Three years ago my brother shot a buck from the same stand at 281 yrds and shot it in the head. ( that was all he could see and the only shot he had) Same gun!
  I wouldn't want to try shots like that with a 30-40 Kraig.
 You must not be very up on the 30-40,  I have been shooting that round since I was 12 and now I'm 65.  I feel that 400 yds is my max now with my old eyes.  I also have a 300 savage which is nothing but an underpowered 308 but will use the krag whick I have 3 . Have killed elk and mule deer by the truck load and never had to track them they were right where I shot them.  So if you know how to shoot and understand ballistics the krag will do anything the 300 savage will do.

Offline muznut 54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 709
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #45 on: July 20, 2012, 09:40:14 AM »
With the best powder for each cartridge the 300 savage is 50fps faster than the Krag with 180gr jacketed bullets and the win308 is a 160fps faster than the 300 savage with the 180gr jacketed.
Those are the facts in the hand loading world with those bullet weights.

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #46 on: July 20, 2012, 12:42:18 PM »
With the best powder for each cartridge the 300 savage is 50fps faster than the Krag with 180gr jacketed bullets and the win308 is a 160fps faster than the 300 savage with the 180gr jacketed.
Those are the facts in the hand loading world with those bullet weights.
But the Krags rep was made with bullets heavier than 200 grains and that is where the round leaves the .300 Savage is the dust.Like the 7and 8 Mauser rounds there just is an understated ability to get the job done and well.

Offline Bingo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #47 on: July 21, 2012, 12:38:45 AM »
   Barstooler, judging by your attitude, I'ld say you had been on the bar stool for a while when you last posted here.
   Yes, I own a "Krag". It is also for sale. Original military with bayonett and Collins green bone machetti.
   1000 yards is good for paper but I wouldn't try to kill a deer at that range unless I had a 50 sniper rifle and I certianly would not try a 300 yrd shot on a deer with a Krag.
   Ok, so spelling is not my strong point, but your problem is obvious!

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #48 on: July 21, 2012, 02:25:49 AM »
A local pawn shop has a Model 700 Classic in .300 Savage.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline muznut 54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 709
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #49 on: July 21, 2012, 02:47:34 AM »
With the best powder for each cartridge the 300 savage is 50fps faster than the Krag with 180gr jacketed bullets and the win308 is a 160fps faster than the 300 savage with the 180gr jacketed.
Those are the facts in the hand loading world with those bullet weights.
But the Krags rep was made with bullets heavier than 200 grains and that is where the round leaves the .300 Savage is the dust.Like the 7and 8 Mauser rounds there just is an understated ability to get the job done and well.
I agree that's why I posted what I did. The Krag has more case capacity and a longer neck for heavier bullets.

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #50 on: July 21, 2012, 03:42:26 AM »
I had a 96 Carbine that was original except someone had put a nice set of Redfield sights on it.  I sure wish I'd kept it.  Very light and handsome.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #51 on: July 21, 2012, 11:00:50 PM »
With the best powder for each cartridge the 300 savage is 50fps faster than the Krag with 180gr jacketed bullets and the win308 is a 160fps faster than the 300 savage with the 180gr jacketed.
Those are the facts in the hand loading world with those bullet weights.
But the Krags rep was made with bullets heavier than 200 grains and that is where the round leaves the .300 Savage is the dust.Like the 7and 8 Mauser rounds there just is an understated ability to get the job done and well.

I agree that the Krag has a well deserved tack driving reputation with bullets 180 grains and heavier when the shooter does his part... due not only to the late 19th century attention to mechanical detail at Springfield in the days of the smokeless transition, but also because of the 1 turn in 10" rifling nicely rendered in each Krag lending itself well in stablizing the long heavy .30s.

The Savage however is in it's element with bullets hovering 30 grains or so either side of it's 150 grain optimum with it's slower 1 turn in 12" twist... 180 grains is about the top end for good stable accuracy in the .300. Oh I've shot 220 grainers in the Savage... my experience... performance at 200 yards is about minute of watermelon, yet with 180s it's a game getting minute of tennis ball at the same range.

As to the velocity differences quoted in the first post of this string, they do not square with my experience using these rifles, at all. Comparing .300 Savage performance to the .308 Winchester as some have here, with the .308s working pressure pushing over 50,000 CUP in some loads, close to factory '06 velocities, are way too hot for '99 Savages chambered for it. The .308's 1/8th inch longer and slightly fatter case, gives greater powder capacity than the short necked .300 because there is less bullet encroachment with slugs above 150 grains. So placing the .300 Savage on equal footing with the .308 is a bit of an overstatement especially with bullets heavier than 150 grains...but we are not comparing the .308 here.

I have been shooting the Krag a long time acquiring 3 of them since I was 14, one that I still have and shoot regularly. I've had two '99 Savages. My first was in my late teens in .303... the second, a Model-99G .300 Savage built in the mid '30s came to me a couple of decades later. I am loading for it and my 1898 .30-40 Krag "late '40s sporter" as we speak.

I load to pressure... loads that have been tested and published to maximum safe levels. I then drop the charge weight 3 or 4 grains and adjust up or down slightly as tests for accuracy and velocity warrant. The Krag's handleable published pressure maxes out at 40,000-CUP and the Savage at 47,000... I will load no hotter than 38,600 in the Krag, and 45,800 is my limit in the Savage. Most of my loads are within 1000 CUP or so of my set maximums.

Using IMR-3031, BL-C(2), or IMR-4064, the Krag just edges the Savage in all bullet weights, by as much as 70fps for 150gr. bullets and 50fps or so with the 180 and 200 grain offerings. At 220 grains the Savage case is so deeply invaded by the bullet  the powder capacity is reduced enough to plunge the velocity into the low 1800s... while the Krag is still sailing along in the 2000fps range...

Don't get me wrong though, both designs are quite unique and most capable at  getting game out to 300 yards when fed what they are designed to shoot. They have been in competition since 1895... and just like today they both have strengths as well as weaknesses... I wouldn't trade either one, I love shooting them and I always take them to the range together.

JT Coyoté

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #52 on: July 22, 2012, 06:52:25 AM »
Either way I like both the .300 Savage and the 30 Govt. I had a Remmie Model 81 in 300 Savage.Great round. Wish I could afford one of the new Savage rifles in 300. You can easily tell the 308 Winchester was conceived by looking at the 300 Savage.

Offline T.R.

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 466
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #53 on: July 22, 2012, 11:10:12 AM »
My Grandad was a cattleman in central Wyoming.  He had a 95 Winchester in 30-40 which he used occasionally for elk hunting.  I shot it a few times as a youth and thought is was a very powerful rifle compared to 30-30 carbine.  Probably caused by the recoil enhanced effect of that curved butt plate.
 
TR

Offline hillbill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #54 on: July 22, 2012, 12:40:51 PM »
ive never found the krag rifles ugly. they are what they are,i think they were a answer to how to top off the mag while still being ready to shoot.slam a couple rounds in the mag, slap the door shut and your ready to go,i think it was a good idea!id take one anyday over a 03 springfield.

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #55 on: July 22, 2012, 03:00:08 PM »
ive never found the krag rifles ugly. they are what they are,i think they were a answer to how to top off the mag while still being ready to shoot.slam a couple rounds in the mag, slap the door shut and your ready to go,i think it was a good idea!id take one anyday over a 03 springfield.
While I do enjoy my Krag,let's not go overboard. The 03 was copied directly from the Mauser. The finest bolt action design ever made.No ands if's or buts.

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #56 on: July 22, 2012, 11:39:23 PM »
ive never found the krag rifles ugly. they are what they are,i think they were a answer to how to top off the mag while still being ready to shoot.slam a couple rounds in the mag, slap the door shut and your ready to go,i think it was a good idea!id take one anyday over a 03 springfield.
While I do enjoy my Krag,let's not go overboard. The 03 was copied directly from the Mauser. The finest bolt action design ever made.No ands if's or buts.

The Mauser is definitely a very strong and versatile bolt action design... if I'm not mistaken, the US government still owes the Mauser family a bit in royalties for the '03... (chuckle)... or was it among the reasons America entered WWI... to nullify that debt... (more chuckling)...

In any case, a few years back my Krag sporter was in need of a new barrel and at the time there were a bunch of surplus unused '03A3 2 groove barrels on the market, sooo... my little Krag now has a bit in common with the venerable .30'03...

If you stick with just copper or if you are a caster, which I am, and use very hard but not brittle lead alloy in your bullets,  the 2 groove '03A3 barrel is as accurate as any... it's well suited to the Krag since the 2 lands and grooves offer less resistance than the 4 or 6 groove barrels and therefore is a bit more forgiving pressure-wise.

When I did the barrel swap I wish I had just gotten the other reamer and taken it all the way... 30-40 Ackley Improved Krag... I've heard and read much on this alteration over the years. It seems the Ackley improvement cuts the back thrust on the bolt face by half or more. Back thrust is THE problem in the Krag. Add to this the efficiency increase given by the reduced case taper and the Ackley shoulder... all producing a gain of 80 or so fps over the same 180 grain factory load in an unaltered Krag... I may still do it one of these days.

In any case, I loaded for the Savage and the Krag this weekend. I set aside 1 round each as a test with identical loads consisting of a 165 grain Hornady HPBT bullet, a CCI large rifle primer, and a weighed 36.5 grain charge of IMR-3031 powder. This load will work the Krag at around 36,000 and the Savage at about 42,000 CUP.


Just scanned them, they are seated to a C.O.L. of 2.60" for the Savage, and
3.095 for the Krag. The .300 was given a slight collet crimp and the 30-40 a
light taper squeeze.


I'll take them to the range this week and see how they do through the screens... all things being equal except the case capacities of course, the Savage should smoke the Krag by 100 or more fps... we'll see...

JTCoyoté

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #57 on: July 24, 2012, 04:47:48 AM »
   
   Well, this is interesting, and really shows the different viewpoints of reloaders vs. hunters who don't reload.
 
   The custom load for the Savage will smoke the Krag by 100 fps at the muzzle.   I know that for reloaders, this is viewed as statistically important, a really big difference.
 
   To someone that doesn't reload, however, I view it as inconsequential.  At 200 yards, I wonder how many extra foot pounds of energy that 100 fps at the muzzle adds?    How much flatter trajectory does 100 fps at the muzzle add?   I would say nothing that matters much in shooting big game.
 
   At normal hunting distances, wouldn't the speed and direction of the wind at the moment a person shoots  have a greater effect on the energy and trajectory of the bullet when it arrives on target than 100 fps extra at the muzzle?
 
   I think that reloading is a wonderful hobby, and I know lots of people who really enjoy doing it.  But for me, alot of the benefits seem of limited importance.
 
Best, Mannyrock
 

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #58 on: July 24, 2012, 07:25:01 PM »
   
   Well, this is interesting, and really shows the different viewpoints of reloaders vs. hunters who don't reload.
 
   The custom load for the Savage will smoke the Krag by 100 fps at the muzzle.   I know that for reloaders, this is viewed as statistically important, a really big difference.
 
   To someone that doesn't reload, however, I view it as inconsequential.  At 200 yards, I wonder how many extra foot pounds of energy that 100 fps at the muzzle adds?    How much flatter trajectory does 100 fps at the muzzle add?   I would say nothing that matters much in shooting big game.
 
   At normal hunting distances, wouldn't the speed and direction of the wind at the moment a person shoots  have a greater effect on the energy and trajectory of the bullet when it arrives on target than 100 fps extra at the muzzle?
 
   I think that reloading is a wonderful hobby, and I know lots of people who really enjoy doing it.  But for me, alot of the benefits seem of limited importance.
 
Best, Mannyrock

Well, The loads I put together in the two cartridges above are not custom loads, they are a test, an experiment to show the performance difference that an identical load of a 165 grain BTHP bullet backed with 36.5 grains of 3031 powder will show, due to the different case volumes of the two cartridges. The Savage is loaded close to its real maximum. While the Krag is only close to it's maximum for the Krag action. That is to say, only about 3/4 of where it could be loaded if it were being fired in a stronger action. The 30-40 cannot be loaded to its full potential in the Krag action without mishap, that was my point.

With that said, I appreciate the hunter's viewpoint as much as anyone, having wandered the Rockies with both of these rifles in pursuit of the Muley Buck and the antlered Wapiti in my younger years.  The reason I began reloading was a result of a fluke that set me seeking for load consistency... not only in velocity and accuracy, but for safety as well.

It all started years ago when I picked up a few boxes of Remington Core-Lokt ammo, 150 grain-ers for the .300 Savage and 180 grains for my pristine 30-40 Krag NRA Carbine. (which I sold 14 years ago and I kick myself daily for letting it go...)  Anyway, it was sight 'em in for that year's "Fall Trek" time. I also plopped down the major bucks to buy one of the new portable chronographs, just to see what the bullets from these rifles were actually doing.

I began with the Savage at 100 yards. It was already sighted in for 150 yards so if nothing had been bumped the bullet should hit about 1" above wherever I put the cross-hairs at that range... which it did and just slightly to the left. The new chrony read the velocity at 2535fps which is 95fps below the advertised 2630fps printed on the cartridge box.

The next shot, again carefully aimed from the bench, was perceptively hotter as the chrony confirmed at 2635fps. It hit a half inch above and 3/4" to the right of the first. I fired a total of 6 rounds averaging 2580fps, the high was 2650 the low was 2505 and they grouped at 2 3/4"... at best that equates to 8" or 9" at 300 yards. I had to ask myself would it shoot tighter without the 145fps factory velocity spread.

Then it was time to test a few through the Krag. It too was sighted in previously at 150 yards with it's factory open sights. The velocity on the box of the 180 grain offerings stated a speed 2400fps. Round one went in at 2 o'clock 1 1/2" from the bull... the chrony said 2340fps... the velocity was lower than advertised and proved to be the low for the string. The next 2 rounds hit within an inch or so above and right of the first with 3/4" between them. These were closer to advertised velocity but still low. Shot #4 screamed through the chrony at 2490fps, (210fps below the factory .30-'06 with the same bullet) it hit an inch higher than the last 2, and kicked a bit sharper as well.

It was a little hard to crack the case loose when I pulled up on the bolt handle after the last shot... and it was the last shot, and last factory ammo I put through this Krag.  It wasn't a problem with the rifle though... the case had a blow-out split 5/16" long down the length below the shoulder, caused by a heavy load coupled with a poorly annealed case that cut loose as the shoulder expanded forward and outward to meet the chamber. 

I broke down 6 of the remaining cartridges for each rifle. There was a different powder weight in each case with a high/low spread between 2 to 2 1/2 grains within each caliber. I've long since proved with hand loads, weighed charges, and Remington Core-Lokt bullets that both rifles will shoot 1 1/2" to 2" groups at 100 yards all day long without mishap, while holding a 1% or less variation in velocity. Under ideal conditions this is game getting at 300 yards.   

With that said, for the hunter reloading puts control of your load's quality and safety into your hands which translates into consistent velocity, pressure, accuracy, and the difference between a dud, a wounded animal, a miss... or... a clean kill out to 300 yards. And it virtually eliminates over-loaded poorly prepared factory rounds which in a low pressure rifle may explode in your face when you squeeze the trigger on 'em.

Reloading started for me because of a high dollar chronograph, and a ruptured case... who'd-a-thunk it...

JTCoyoté

Offline gcrank1

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7644
  • Gender: Male
Re: .30-40 Krag vs. .300 Savage. Who woulda thought?
« Reply #59 on: August 09, 2012, 02:46:59 PM »
I have Grandpa's 98 Krag rifle; he paid something like $3.95 for it and it shoots just fine. Considering my and the rifle's open sight limitations, any critter hit with a handloaded bullet from 150 through 220 gr. wont know the difference between that and a hotter loaded round.
A few years ago I had a 'sporter'; the mag. box had been removed and another sideplate fitted to flush it up some and a somewhat European style stock. With one in the spout it still held 3, and 4 if it was loaded tight, but when do you have need of more than 3 when deer hunting? Wish I had some pics, but I was too busy shooting to think camera...........
"Halt while I adjust my accoutrements!"
      ><   ->
We are only temporary caretakers of the past heading toward an uncertain future
22Mag UV / 22LR  Sportster
357Mag Schuetzen Special
45-70  SS Ultra Hunter with UV cin.lam. wood
12ga. 'Ol' Ugly OverKill', Buck barrel c/w  SpeedStock  and swap 28" x Full bird barrel, 1974