Author Topic: Hearing very loud screams again... (Read 11229 times)

kevinsmith5 · « **Reply #60 on:** July 12, 2012, 07:10:34 AM »

Quote from: Swampman on July 12, 2012, 04:51:06 AM

I know more about religion and science than you.

It sounds suspiciously like you MAKE UP more about religion and science...

Scibaer · « **Reply #61 on:** July 12, 2012, 08:42:46 AM »

if one does not change, then they do not grow. without growth, one falls behind and therefor is further from knowledge and becomes more ignorant all the time.

science does not lie, science is self correcting, peer reviewed and is increasingly correct.
its seems to me that a man who will not look to increase his base of knowledge by any and all means is scared.
scared and prefers to hide in shadow of ignorance.

i dont see what you say as the truth, i see what you say as something you want everyone else to believe.
i dont claim to know it all, in fact i have many times that i dont. but you claim to know more then the common wisdom of science or the ever lasting truth of religion ? and your "truth" has more substance then that ?

are you really hurting that bad for acknowledgment ? do you really have know everything about everything that desperately ? that you will make increasingly wild claims and make statements that are , with no disrespect .. mentally suspect ?

Old Syko · « **Reply #62 on:** July 12, 2012, 08:52:11 AM »

Swampy is trying to tell us he is a string theorist with a knowledge beyond that of even Albert Einstein. Since Einstein was unable to finish the calculations before his death Swampy will soon regale us with those figures as the final word and documentation of multiple dimensions I'm sure. Strange thing, of all Einstein's ponderings on the subject of multiple dimensions I don't remember that first mention of bigfoot. That may be because of the fact that bigfoot, nessie, and the Easter bunny that poops jelly beans, along with others of a similar ilk only exist in the minds of the weak or uneducated.

As far as noises in the woods, I've been amazed to discover the source of some. Bobcats have a multitude of voices as do other critters.

Scibaer · « **Reply #63 on:** July 12, 2012, 02:01:28 PM »

well if you had any credibility at all , which from what i have read, it was very little, its all but gone now.
seeing as you know everything about everything, you must know that too
but, from where i sit, you dont know much at all, and prove that every time you post.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #64 on:** July 12, 2012, 02:35:09 PM »

I'm pretty much common sense guy. Are these "bigfeet" that get seen by all these witnesses so darn smart that they evade the millions of trail cameras out there? Just a simple common sense question.

Scibaer · « **Reply #65 on:** July 12, 2012, 05:39:53 PM »

thats actually a very rational question. and i will do you one better. there are thousands of people in the woods all over the US all the time, hunters, hikers, campers.. you name it. trail cams and video cams for online viewing...
the required population of animals that would be required to maintain a popluation the size of bigfoots and the amount food and range they'd need to survive ... divided by the amount of "eyes" in the woods equates to a ratio mathmatically says that bigfoots would be seen way more many times then thats claimed now.. the extact ration and number im not going to provide .. but in short and sweet terms it tells us that there are no BF's out there to be seen ..
here in michigan there are 13 hunters for every square mile of land..

Mikey · « **Reply #66 on:** July 13, 2012, 12:54:43 AM »

Now this is gettin' funny. Anybody who is anti-Swampy postulates on the necessary population size of a viable Bigfoot species, the ratio of humans to Bigfeet, the advantages of technology and alla that but, when was the last time anyone looked at a satellite night photo of North and South America when/where lights indicate human populated areas? I mean hey, guys, there is almost 70 percent of the land mass of this entire continent (north and south combined) and I think almost that alone of North American (US and Canada) where the lights ain't on after dark, and Canada is much darker at night than we are.
Technology aside, as infrared cameras, trail cams and the like need battery power and make high pitched noises some animals or creatures with high pitched hearing capability can detect, there is still one hay of a huge whoppin' large piece of land not settled or populated where Bigfoot could easily reside or hide. And, of course, I believe the Monmouth Cave system which transcends the entire continent in all four directions would be a decent means of aiding travel undetected.
I think we still have a very long way to go before we can adequately detect and identify a Bigfoot without killing it first, unless your pet cats and dogs start disappearing or your sheep are molested and you don't have any Armenians living locally. Personnaly. I think the easiest way to check if they are really shape shifting aliens is to measure Michelle's foot size, compare that to Hillary's and maybe set up a trail cam in Air Force 1 - they might not be able to detect the high pitched noise of the trail cam once they are in the air and if either of them begin to change and start to look like Henry Kissinger then we will know we have a Bigfoot.........

billy_56081 · « **Reply #67 on:** July 13, 2012, 01:14:36 AM »

Quote from: Swampman on July 12, 2012, 10:27:51 PM

Quote from: billy_56081 on July 12, 2012, 02:35:09 PM
I'm pretty much common sense guy. Are these "bigfeet" that get seen by all these witnesses so darn smart that they evade the millions of trail cameras out there? Just a simple common sense question.
There's nothing to trigger a trail cam. A trail cam has to sense movement.

Bigfeet don't move? DERP!!!!!

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #68 on:** July 13, 2012, 01:50:33 AM »

Billy quit clouding the issue with fact.

Religion is based on belief , either you believe or you do not. Its that simple.
science is divided , FACT or what have been proven, theory -what might be but not proven .

mixing the three shows a lack of common sense .

I would never say I know everything as it would be a simple matter to show the folly in such a claim. One who claims to do so is saying they are God as he alone knows every thing.
This deminsion idea , does it exist ? don't know . But say it does if a human can see it a camera should also . As proof of this the pictures we see that are taken where objects the naked eye didn't see show up in the picture

. The pictures of big foot

people show .

like time travel at least in one direction is possible from a mathmatical point of view but not a pratical application yet maybe this deminsion is also possible but not yet pratical to detect.

but like all people before us we must live with the facts .

Scibaer · « **Reply #69 on:** July 13, 2012, 04:44:28 AM »

firstly im not anti swampy.. and i can prove that
second. my post, if you read it was to show that mathmatically speaking of bigfoot was out there , we'd have seen him by now without any question. i showed that by using a very common example of the numbers of BF's that should be out there walking about if they were real ..
3rd i was not the one making claims like parallel universes or other dimensions or claiming i know everything or silly claims about underground caves that go all over the US that bigfoot uses to travel by.. im of a sane mind

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #70 on:** July 13, 2012, 04:51:39 AM »

One day it will prove out that BF is just a lost hippie

BUGEYE · « **Reply #71 on:** July 13, 2012, 05:04:00 AM »

there is only 'one' swampman, but someone spots him about every day and there seems to be at least one picture of him.
if there were as many bigfeet as people claim, there Would be a picture of one.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #72 on:** July 13, 2012, 05:12:41 AM »

Its really a plot by the Bush family .

Scibaer · « **Reply #73 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:19:49 AM »

so, God tells you that bigfoot are shape shifting rift riders, who travel parallel universes but they can not control it.. and somehow only manage to pop up in the back woods at midnight ?

... and we are suppose to then take anything you say seriously ?

billy_56081 · « **Reply #74 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:53:15 AM »

So why has one of these "bigfeet" who are dumb enough to be seen by "witnesses" evaded the millions upon millions of trail cameras out there?

Scibaer · « **Reply #75 on:** July 13, 2012, 12:27:49 PM »

so, now bigfoot moves without motion huh ?

mannyrock · « **Reply #76 on:** July 13, 2012, 01:00:31 PM »

Swampy,

Stop this interdimensional bigfoot c-p right now! You are undercutting your personally credibility on the great accuracy of the Remington 700s (which I do happen to believe in!)

Manny

gendoc · « **Reply #77 on:** July 13, 2012, 01:33:19 PM »

Quote from: mannyrock on July 13, 2012, 01:00:31 PM

the great accuracy of the Remington 700s (which I do happen to believe in!)

Manny

i'm glad your experiances leed you to believe in them...................

trotterlg · « **Reply #78 on:** July 14, 2012, 05:55:35 PM »

I think what people fail to understand is that we, Us and Big Foot, are in the same place but at different times. Neither of us control the time slip, there are probably a bunch of Big Foots sitting around talking about the skinny little people they see from time to time also. Do trail cameras trigger when they see Big Foot? I think the answer is sort of obvious, they don't, or we would have pictures of him. We have pictures of him when we see him and point a camera at him, lots of them, but, for what ever reason the automated systems don't seem to work for a Being from another dimension. Surprise, surprise! Listen to Swampman, he has some very good thoughts on the subject. Larry

P.S.: http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/blog/34089/bigfoot+hair+sells+for+225+at+a+texas+auction+is+it+real/

kevinsmith5 · « **Reply #79 on:** July 15, 2012, 04:37:40 PM »

Trail cameras usually activate based on infrared light motion detectors. Of visible light hits them and bounces back (required for you to see them) then IR would too. And where are all these pictures taken by hand held cameras you refer to??

trotterlg · « **Reply #80 on:** July 15, 2012, 06:25:27 PM »

Where have you been for the last 20 years, under a rock? There are lots of stills, film and video of him, just look on the internet. Trail cameras are triggered by IR light, I don't know why they don't pick him up, but clearly they don't, the only pictures we have of him are ones where humans see him and then take a picture of him. This has to tell you something, you just are not listening. Larry

Victor3 · « **Reply #81 on:** July 15, 2012, 08:50:29 PM »

Quote from: trotterlg on July 15, 2012, 06:25:27 PM

There are lots of stills, film and video of him, just look on the internet.

Are there?

I think I've seen the majority of images supposedly depicting "him," along with many photos of Jesus and/or Mary on tortillas. None of these are evidence of anything other than that people can operate cameras.

Back to shape-shifting-rift-riding; It always amazes me when otherwise seemingly rational people view a lack of hard evidence as the best evidence to prop up a whacky theory.

Scientology comes to mind...

Swampman · « **Reply #82 on:** July 15, 2012, 10:40:39 PM »

Quote from: kevinsmith5 on July 15, 2012, 04:37:40 PM

Trail cameras usually activate based on infrared light motion detectors. Of visible light hits them and bounces back (required for you to see them) then IR would too. And where are all these pictures taken by hand held cameras you refer to??

There's nothing to trigger a trail cam. A regular camera or movie camera will pick up extra diminsional objects. It happens all the time.

GeneRector · « **Reply #83 on:** July 16, 2012, 02:53:21 AM »

Howdy! Swampman and Scibaer: You have both argued well your stand or view on Bigfoot. I hope that in the near future we will access and gather more information on BF and hopefully find out exactly what they are and/or what people are seeing. Regardless of whatever view you have, we still need to pursue the science of BF research so that one day we will all know precisely all about Bigfoot. Until that day comes about, factual information should be compiled and evaluated on an ongoing basis. Rest assured that most all of us want to know what this BF thing is all about. Always, Gene

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #84 on:** July 16, 2012, 06:30:33 AM »

First all 700's don't shoot well, most shoot good , some really good but not all.
Second Time slip warp what ever, you can see BF move but the camera can't

. My BS meter is higher than ever before.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #85 on:** July 16, 2012, 06:31:24 AM »

BTW a time slip is what we turn in to get paid

cwlongshot · « **Reply #86 on:** July 16, 2012, 06:46:27 AM »

This has become quite the entertaining thread... Swampy as usual makes it! LOL

The one thing I will ad is that this world is filled with things I do know know and have not seen. I know we are not "alone" in it. I think it pompus to think it we are alone in this vast universe.

I just got back form a week riding ATVs on the trails in Northern Maine. Vast uninhabited reaches of woods... One AM last week I stopped along a trail to rest and grab some water...it was silent sans the birds and critters. Then I realized I herd pounding... Almost like someone building something but I know I'm at lest 12 miles form the nearest ...anything.. (GPS satalite proved it) but still there was the pounding... I tried to record it but you can not really make it out. Almost dismissed as if a wood pecker. but not as consistant or repetitive, but loud and from a hillside some 4-500 yards distant. Who knows what it was... I don't but it was kinda strange...

CW

Scibaer · « **Reply #87 on:** July 17, 2012, 03:57:41 AM »

As i said in an earlier post, i have been more then interested in the BF topic of 30 years .
i have read an awful lot about BF, pro and con. i once believed in those less then scientific possibilities or alternate ideas of the BF's possible existence. i have had relatives, namely my dad and older brother who had very shocking BF experiences of thier own. my brother fell asleep while deer hunting only to wake up with BF standing in front of him, my brother got a very good, long view of it...
as i went to college and got a education of sciences and sociologies , i started to apply that knowledge to the topic of BF.
theology, mythology, the scientific method, biology and biogenesis' and many more studies can be applied to BF.
and i have done that for all these years, and i'm not alone or the only one who is going so.
in short, only a corpse of a BF body will prove the existence of the creature, not conjecture, bad data, other worldy beliefs or anything that cannot be documented, scientifically understood and rationally explained.
now, if we want to talk about BF being a real animal, and using biological range, breeding numbers and physical behaviors to 'map out' where to hunt, and yes i meant hunt ( stalk, spot, kill and harvest ) a BF to prove its real world existance.. i am all in for that in every way..

cwlongshot · « **Reply #88 on:** July 17, 2012, 04:03:02 AM »

Just this am I retrieved a trail cam I set out before I left for vacation... I got a bunch of deer and something entirely unexpected!!! I'll post the pic later...

CW

Swampman · « **Reply #89 on:** July 17, 2012, 04:38:19 AM »

I was heard something in the Maine woods that was completely unexplainable. I am a believer......