Help SEn Moran fight UN gun control that hillary and obummer want.

[powderman]

Help Senator Moran nix UN gun control    Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) needs your help.

As GOA reported before the holiday break, the United Nations has begun discussions over finalizing language in the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) -- talks that are expected to last all month.

Senator Moran has prepared a letter, which GOA has in its possession, demanding that the Obama Administration oppose any treaty that would sacrifice Americans’ gun rights -- even if it means “breaking consensus” at the July conference.

“We are concerned that the Arms Trade Treaty poses dangers to rights protected under the Second Amendment,” Senator Moran says in his letter.

You have to ratify the ATT to see what’s in it

Despite the risks to our liberties, there is much double-speak taking place at the UN. The talks in New York are reminiscent of the process that Americans saw with the passage of ObamaCare. Remember Nancy Pelosi’s famous quip: “You have to pass the [health care] bill so you can see what is in it”?

In similar fashion, the gun control details in the ATT will “not be publicly available” until the treaty has been agreed to by all the member nations.

It makes you wonder if Pelosi is being paid as a consultant at these meetings.

Make no mistake about it; UN officials are using secrecy to their advantage, claiming the treaty will not infringe upon the rights of individual gun owners. They claim the treaty only deals with international transfers of firearms.

But Moran counters that the treaty will expand federal gun controls and lead to the registration of firearms.

The Arms Trade Treaty WILL restrict your gun rights

The Moran letter quotes a draft of the treaty, noting that it requires nations to “monitor and control” arms in transit and to prohibit the unauthorized “transfer of arms from any location” -- a requirement, he says, that implies a huge “expansion of federal firearms controls that would be unacceptable on Second Amendment grounds.”

And the draft version of the treaty calls for the creation of a “U.N.-based firearms registry for all firearms that are either imported into or transit across national territory.” Can you imagine any greater infringement of your privacy … giving UN bureaucrats the “right” to collect information on you as a gun owner?

Some 130 Representatives sent their own letter to the President on Monday reminding him that the Second Amendment guarantees the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms” and declaring that the U.S. has no business supporting a treaty that infringes on the Bill of Rights.

The House letter is a good first step, but getting a similar one sent from the Senate is even more important. After all, IT’S THE SENATE -- and not the House -- which must ratify the ATT.

Since the treaty will be finalized later this month, it is very important for Senator Moran to get at least 34 Senators on his letter -- meaning he would have enough votes to prevent the treaty’s ratification.

ACTION: Please click here to send a message urging your Senators to sign on to the Moran letter right away. Senator Moran’s office says that Senators have been very slow to respond to his request for more signatories. But he needs these signatures right away!

[magooch]

Does anyone doubt that with the Obamunist at the helm, he will pay any attention to whether, or not the Senate ratifies the treaty?  He will simply issue an edict that the treaty is in effect.  Holder will back him up. 

[powderman]

Does anyone doubt that with the Obamunist at the helm, he will pay any attention to whether, or not the Senate ratifies the treaty?  He will simply issue an edict that the treaty is in effect.  Holder will back him up.

 
MAGOOCH. YEP, and so will the obama supporters here and nation wide. POWDERMAN. 

[gypsyman]

As much as Obama wants to sign this, I don't think he will. At least not before November. His handlers know that if he does, it would rile up more gun owners, and with the race with Romney being so close, I don't think he wants to lose more vote's. And we know by some that post here, there are actually gun owners that don't think Obama's so bad. If he could somehow postpone it, or get it passed without his name attached to it, he would do it in a heartbeat. We will see at the end of the month. gypsyman

[powderman]

His handlers know that if he does, it would rile up more gun owners,

 
GYPSYMAN. It might if it ever made primetime news, the media seems to pretty well cover it up or at least gloss over it. I don't think most of the obama supporters even own a gun let alone hunt, If they did they wouldn't be obama supporters. POWDERMAN.