Author Topic: war and poverty, or poverty and war?  (Read 413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rio grande

  • Trade Count: (39)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
war and poverty, or poverty and war?
« on: July 19, 2012, 06:42:48 AM »
Here are two articles from very different perspectives on why Obama is a lesser evil than Romney.
Just FYI... I could not hold my nose long enough to vote for either one!

"So a President Romney will virtually guarantee a war with Iran, will defer to Israeli leadership in the Middle East, and will take on the role of world policeman with increased resources and commitment, leading to more wars..."

http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2012/07/18/obama-vs-romney-two-shades-of-nay/

"The absolute best outcome for the next four years is total political gridlock. The best way to achieve this is divided government. Let Obama have the White House, let the Tea Party gather further momentum..."

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/07/the-case-for-obama-why-four-more-years-may-be-less-disastrous-than-unrestrained-gop-rule/#more-15264

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: war and poverty, or poverty and war?
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2012, 04:23:20 AM »
I'm surprised a publication such as the Occidental Observer is still able to function in the present time of total media control.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.