You just keep believing that you can get something for nothing. I don't......I'll stick with a quality product......yes the owners are twits which is common now days.
Gee Swamp, not that me nor anybody else needs your aproval, but we are quite happy with what we pay for. Maybe you think your money is more valuble than ours? Maybe you work harder for your's than everybody else? I've two Kel Tecs that have performed perfectly, with all kinds of ammo, in all kinds of conditions, through too many rounds to keep track of, over an extended period of time and which show absolutely no sign of doing anything but continuing to do so. I can say the same for 3 more my son and grandson own. You keep telling everyone they are faulty and I should ignore what I know to be true in favor of your ranting, but a blind man can see two things. 1) mine sure work just fine as does my son and grandson's 2) so do those of a great number of other Kel Tec owners some who are right here on Gray Beard. Guess you're more short sighted than a blind man Swamp. You see only what you want to see and truth be danged. But I guess I should be disapointed. I guess I should ignore how my own firearms perfom for me and bow to your insisting they will blow up. Even though you have not shown one shred of proof that they will......NOT ONE! You state your choice of firearm is superior because it's flawless though anyone who can ask a question or who can read can easily and quickly find out for themselve's that's far from the truth. Still you insist it's true because it cost more and because you say so. That argument is laughable! Why is it that if Ruger owners complain then they are twits but if someone complains about a Kel Tec they're preaching gospel? As to the Ruger owners with complaints being twits.....hmmmmm who would know a twit better than another twit?
You say I don't back my comments with fact? ( Guess pics of my own gun in one piece mean nothing for some mysterious Swamp World logic) I say I've supplied way more than you but how's this for you?
Kel Tec PF-9.....The barrel is manufactured of AISA
4140 steel hardened to 48
RHC, and the slide is constructed of the same steel. The frame, which houses the trigger group, consists of a solid machined
7075-T56 aluminum billet.
Ruger LC9......all they'll say is barrel and slide alloy steel and won't go into more detail ( heck that could mean anything ), frame is glass filled plastic ( What? The LC9 has a plastic frame? A PLASTIC FRAME?
Dang Swamp that can't be true. I've no doubt you'll tell me Ruger made a misprint! )
Where's the superior materials you brag about Swamp? Hmmmmm? Where are they?
Wanna know something else? The only Kel Tec to blow up was the PMR-30 and so far, over 27,000 PMR-30s have been produced, and there have been about a dozen documented incidents of a case failure which resulted in damage to a PMR-30! And Swamp, Mr. Know It All, Mr. Ruger Uses Superior Materials, guess what failed? A small part made from glass filled polymer! Now where have I heard that being used? Oh yeah, that's exactly what Ruger uses for the LC-9's whole dang frame! Shoots the heck out of your Ruger uses superior materials don't it Swamp! And YES, read the dang reports, ammo is the suspected cause! Saying all that, 12 out of well over 27,000 and Kel Tec promptly replaced the part with metal so it could never happen again and it hasn't!
Tell ya what, if we're still around in another 3 1/2 years, and assuming you actualy shoot your pet LC9 if you can quit sitting and admiring it and the price on the sales reciept, tell us then how it held up. That's assuming it does or that it was worth keeping. Till then my PF-9 has 3 1/2 years more proof of holding up than your LC9 does right now! Of course by then my PF-9 will have doubled the use of your LC9 and I'm betting it will still be going strong and you'll still be telling me it's gonna blow up!
