For those who believe SNOPES is truthful..

[ironglow]

  Therevhave been claims that when Obama as a "community activist" sued Citibank in 1994, he already knew that many of his clients were financial failures..
  Still SNOPES says it is not so.. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/loans.asp
 
  Others disagree with SNOPES and offered proof..yet SNOPES did not retract;
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/with-landmark-lawsuit-barack-obama-pushed-banks-to-give-subprime-loans-to-chicago%E2%80%99s-african-americans.html
 
   Info has come out that Obama had the proof right in his hands..this is his list of clients.  Just look at the number of bankruptcies, say nothing of the likely bad credit situations which don't show here.  These are the filing papers the "community activist" had these in his hands when he filed the suit.
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/104763206/Chicago-Buycks-Lawsuit-Plaintiffs
 
  Frankly, I can suggest a better place to put your faith..than in SNOPES or any other "fact check" organization..       

[Poopers]

Generally speaking.. I try not to believe anything I read online if its politically related. Everyone has an agenda and they do what they can to promote it. Same applies for TV.


Maybe Im too jaded but I have no hope for the country turning around. Im just sitting around hoping the big collapse comes after I go 

[ironglow]

  Right poopers;
     Almost all of us are opinionated when it comes to politics and we should all be taken with a grain of salt.  The ones which gripe me the most are those such as the alphabet networks (esp PMS-NBC), news magazines and  "fact check" outfits... all of whom claim to be unbiased.  I would respect them more if they were simply honest as to their motivations.