Author Topic: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.  (Read 2786 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yellowtail3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5664
  • Gender: Male
  • Oh father of the four winds, fill my sails!
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2012, 03:19:58 PM »
Life goes on, get over it and move on...............
that would have been excellent advice for the birthers, racists, xenophobes, and reichwing wackjobs that have been whining about obummber and odumbo and scary mooslims and birth certificates for the past four years...
Jesus said we should treat other as we'd want to be treated... and he didn't qualify that by their party affiliation, race, or even if they're of diff religion.

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #31 on: September 08, 2012, 03:26:58 PM »
Quote
I didn't ask you about what RP thinks, I asked the question to you personally. Do you, Bugeye personally think that it's OK to violate the Constitution if you believe it's for a good cause?

 
DBLBASS. Thats hardly a fair question. I don't know the entire constitution and I doubt that Bugeye or anybody else here does either. Bugeye would be foolish to try and say yes, or no. Evidently you  have something specific in mind or you wouldn't keep asking, so lets hear it, several of us might answer. POWDERMAN.  :o :o
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2012, 03:53:14 PM »
Quote
I didn't ask you about what RP thinks, I asked the question to you personally. Do you, Bugeye personally think that it's OK to violate the Constitution if you believe it's for a good cause?

 
DBLBASS. Thats hardly a fair question. I don't know the entire constitution and I doubt that Bugeye or anybody else here does either. Bugeye would be foolish to try and say yes, or no. Evidently you  have something specific in mind or you wouldn't keep asking, so lets hear it, several of us might answer. POWDERMAN.  :o :o

A fair question? You are either in favor of the allowing the government to violate the Constitution if you feel it's for a good cause or you're not. It's a yes or no answer. You don't need to be a Constitutional scholar to know whether you think it should be violated or not.

Me personally, I am NOT in favor of violating the Constitution even if I feel it's for a good cause. The Constitution is supposed to be a limit on government. If we the people allow the government to violate the Constitution because we think it's for a good cause then we're treading on thin ice. We're actively letting the government turn it into a piece of toilet paper. Liberals love to violate the 2nd Amendment because they think it's for a good cause.

Bugeye criticizes RP in just about every thread so I'm curious if Bugeye thinks it's OK to violate the Constitution if he thinks it's for a good cause such as limiting abortion for example.



"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #33 on: September 08, 2012, 03:56:45 PM »
Quote
I didn't ask you about what RP thinks, I asked the question to you personally. Do you, Bugeye personally think that it's OK to violate the Constitution if you believe it's for a good cause?

 
DBLBASS. Thats hardly a fair question. I don't know the entire constitution and I doubt that Bugeye or anybody else here does either. Bugeye would be foolish to try and say yes, or no. Evidently you  have something specific in mind or you wouldn't keep asking, so lets hear it, several of us might answer. POWDERMAN.  :o :o

Well, I think it's a fair question......pretty simple and straightforward....how about it? Do you think it's ok, to violation the constitution, if you think it's for a good cause?
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #34 on: September 08, 2012, 04:56:57 PM »
I don't believe that murdering babies is covered as a womans right in the constitution, if thats what you mean. The right to life I believe is covered and the childs rights are being violated. Is this what you are getting at?? POWDERMAN.  ??? ???
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2012, 05:34:11 PM »
I don't believe that murdering babies is covered as a womans right in the constitution, if thats what you mean. The right to life I believe is covered and the childs rights are being violated. Is this what you are getting at?? POWDERMAN.  ??? ???

No, that's not what I'm getting at. Roe Vs. Wade is a clear violation of the 10th:

Quote
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Constitution does not give the federal government power to regulate abortion.

My question has a simple yes or no answer to it. I'm not sure why people can't answer it that way.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26939
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2012, 06:05:20 PM »
Seems some here are a bit ignorant of the US Constitution. Likely many have never read it and therefore have no clue what it says or means. That folks is just what both parties are betting their existent on. OK here is a link to the full text of it. If you have read it do so and try to remember it.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

Perhaps then you can understand Ron Paul's stance on things. I like him believe in the US Constitution it is THE ONLY THING that separates the US from the rest of the world and almost all the politicians in DC have spit on it and declared it out of date and of no further importance. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Since no one you are asking the question of seems able to respond I will. No it is NEVER OK to violate the Constitution because someone thinks the end might justify the means. The US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence ARE the US. Without them we are no different than the rest of the world.

For those of you who've never read the Declaration of Independence here it is also:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html

You either support them or you don't. If not then you are part of the problem not part of the solution. Neither the dumocraps nor the republicraps are gonna help you they don't care as much about you as you do about the mosquito about to bite and infect you with west nile disease. In fact both parties are a disease and more deadly than west nile.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline thumper113

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 468
  • Gender: Male
Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2012, 06:41:25 PM »
I really wish a "None of the above" was a viable option.

Cheney and the politico machine obviously controlled the Bush White House.

Obama sucks.

Romney sucks, but may actually help the country fiscally.

Like so many of you I love our Constitution.  It is the second greatest document ever written which created the world's greatest country.

The problem is how folks keep "interpreting" it in much the same way they've interpreted the Bible and refuse to believe it meant what it said.

We have already lost many of the rights outlined in it and anyone that doesn't believe that is fooling themselves.

But right now we have a decision to make and you and other patriots must ask yourselves "How can I have the biggest impact?"

Voting for a write in is a cop out.  It will have no real effect on the election.  That is a campaign that must be a long term plan to have any really meaning.

We can all wish we had other options, but we don't.

It's like when my kids were little and were given two choices of movies and would go to their room to protest we weren't watching a different movie that wasn't an option.  They thought they were punishing us, but the rest of the family watched one of the two options.

If you vote third party, write in or refuse to vote, you are letting others make the decision for you.  Unlike my kids, you can't go sit in your room for four years and it have no effect on your life.

We need people who care to vote in a manner they feel will have an effect on this election.  To do otherwise would be to give up and somehow I just don't see the folks on this forum giving up.

:stepsoffsoapbox:
God Bless Our Troops!

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2012, 08:24:26 PM »
Glad you are off your soap box. Now, did you follow the links provided by Greybeard and READ?
I thought not ::)
 
And the majority of you won't, you are not interested in real freedom, you simply want to have your cake and eat it too. That's how we got to this empass. And why we will lose our freedom.
 
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline thumper113

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 468
  • Gender: Male
Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2012, 09:22:13 PM »
Read the Declaration of Independence and Constitution?  I have several times.  I can still recite the preamble from memory.  As I said there is only one document better, the Bible,

Do you understand that the point being made earlier is the oldest and longest of the Constitutional arguments and the two sides of where our current parties actually originated?

The original fight for Democrats and Republicans wasn't liberal vs conservative or even big government vs smaller government.  Plain and simple it was how much power the Constitution gave the federal government and what is reserved for the state.

The primary problem with both documents is people are watering both down or picking and choosing what applies to who.

However, sitting and whining about it isn't going to do anything and refusing to vote is totally contradictory to why those documents were written.

If you want to go pout and vote for someone who has no chance of winning by all means do so.  I believe in your right and will fight for your right to do so.

But just like my kids and the movies you've only got two real options that may come true.  You can push for the third all you want but reality is reality.  Casting a vote for Ron Paul and thinking he has any chance to win is nothing but deluding yourself and handing an extra vote to the more liberal party.

Do I like Romney?   Absolutely not.
Do I trust him?  Of course not.
Does he scare me less than Obama?  You bet your britches.

If I thought voting for Fred Flinstone would keep those two out of office, I'd do it.

Since I'm back on my soapbox I'll throw this out.  It is a very irresponsible and childish to know as an adult with obligations to look at a situation that only has certain possible outcomes and hold your breath for something different.

How many times have we said that balancing the budget is simple, don't spend more than you make?

And now folks are wanting to spend political currency they don't have.

Do you think you are going to fix all the constitutional issues by refusing to vote for Romney?

If you truly care that much, get off your butt and run for office because no one on this forum is arguing that they haven't violated our constitution. 

But that started long ago.  I never had my true 2nd amendment rights.  They were gone before I was born.

So have I read it.  Yeah and I live it.   I don't think my view is the only allowed one.  Only thing on this forum that gets me wrapped around the axle is if you are contemptuous of my country or try to step on MY rights while I'm defending yours.  So many people forget that.  The fact that the constitution applies on both sides of the aisle.

I believe in our constitution and the system it established.  I get sick and tired of people who abuse it and the others who put it down.  I get sick of people who whine about losing their rights and are too lazy to write their representatives "because it won't matter anyway."

Dang it.  Someone here get off your butt and run for office during the next election. 

It reminds me of folks that were so shocked because someone called the state police on some over zealous local LEOs and the state actually did something about it.

Things don't change unless someone changes them.

Ron Paul is unelectable.  Work to find someone with the same message who has a chance.
God Bless Our Troops!

Offline saddlebum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1694
  • Gender: Male
  • "I ain't never been killed in my life."
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #40 on: September 08, 2012, 10:37:53 PM »
Great post, thumper113,...Thank you!
" FIREARMS STAND NEXT IN IMPORTANCE TO THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF. THEY ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S LIBERTY TEETH AND KEYSTONE UNDER INDEPENDENCE."       George Washington

“OUR CONSTITUTION WAS MADE ONLY FOR A MORAL AND RELIGIOUS PEOPLE. IT IS WHOLLY INADEQUATE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ANY OTHER."           John Adams

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #41 on: September 08, 2012, 11:00:05 PM »
.......only a great post if one disregards how we got to where we are today.....a refusal by the republican party to step up to the plate and do the right thing...elect a conservative!
 
Why won't they run a true conservative? Easy! Moral bankruptcy and cowardice, plain and simple. They are terrified of the idea of having to live in a world where they are responsible for their own actions and there is no big brother around to bail them out with OPM (other peoples money)
 
So they run liberals and try to call them conservative, and condem anyone who dares to disagree.......that's how we got where we are today, and you folks are telling us that we need to keep doing it.
 
That is either insanity, or deliberate moral cowardice.
Either way, you will condem those who believe in true freedom, to excuse your parties failings.
 
Democrat......Republican.....at this point the only real difference is the color of the pig....they've both got their snouts in the trough!
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2012, 04:48:00 AM »
Thanks Graybeard for posting that. That's exactly what I was getting at with Bugeye. He complains about certain Ron Paul votes in every thread yet he is unable or unwilling to comprehend that Ron Paul voted against those bills because they violate the Constitution despite the fact that they seem like they have good intentions.

That's why I asked Bugeye the original question which he has yet to answer.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2012, 04:49:48 AM »
good grief,  it's never OKAY to violate the constitution.  both candidates on the ballot "in my opinion" have violated the intent of  that document.
RP has indeed  violated the intent of the constitution, but his kool-ade apparently dulls the senses of those who drink it.   they see him as the second coming of the messiah.

the thinking people here realize what must be done on nov. 6th, even if we have to hold our nose.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26939
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #44 on: September 09, 2012, 05:38:53 AM »
I totally disagree. The THINKING folks have said enough and are no longer going to vote lesser evil only to find they are really the greater evil. Unlike some here I just do not see romney as a better choice than obama. Both are equally bad for this country and the Constitution.

Ron Paul has never voted against the Constitution. It is his guiding light on all of his votes. Yeah sometimes that means he votes against something that sounds like it might be good for us but he like I believe the Constitution is enough and all we need.

I know of no one who sees Ron Paul as a messiah unlike obama supporters who actually do see him in that way. What we see in him is a man of  convictions who always stays for what he believes and what he believes is the US Constitution is the one thing that can return this nation to the greatness it once had.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #45 on: September 09, 2012, 06:05:29 AM »
when folks like planned parenthood can take your "UNDER-AGE DAUGHTER" across state lines without your consent or notification and have her baby killed, who is supposed to stand up for the rights of that baby and the parents of the "UNDER-AGE-DAUGHTER"?
apparently the Constitution is a useless scrap of paper unless it's standing up for YOUR right to commit murder on the most precious of human beings.

democrats and libertarians condone murder and taking away parental control of "UNDER-AGE-CHILDREN"
on judgement day, God will nullify mans law and judge us by HIS law.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31290
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #46 on: September 09, 2012, 06:13:44 AM »
Doublebass asks a "straw man question;
 
  " I didn't ask you about what RP thinks, I asked the question to you personally. Do you, Bugeye personally think that it's OK to violate the Constitution if you believe it's for a good cause?"
************************************************************************************88
 
  Doublebass arbitrarily decideds Gov Romney did something unconstitutional....  Normally to decide for sure that any act is constitutional, an entire SCOTUS trial is necessary.
    "Just because Doublebass says so"...isn't quite enough..
 
   Doublebass will have to PROVE his contention if he is to expect an answer.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #47 on: September 09, 2012, 06:22:28 AM »
 Thumper said:

Read the Declaration of Independence and Constitution?  I have several times.  I can still recite the preamble from memory.  As I said there is only one document better, the Bible,

Do you understand that the point being made earlier is the oldest and longest of the Constitutional arguments and the two sides of where our current parties actually originated?

The original fight for Democrats and Republicans wasn't liberal vs conservative or even big government vs smaller government.  Plain and simple it was how much power the Constitution gave the federal government and what is reserved for the state.

The primary problem with both documents is people are watering both down or picking and choosing what applies to who.If you mean the two major parties, this is true.

However, sitting and whining about it isn't going to do anything and refusing to vote is totally contradictory to why those documents were written.I haven't seen anyone suggest giving up voting overall.Calling out the faults of those that would govern, is not whining.Voting for someone else on the ballot, other than the establishment select, is exactly what the Constitution is about.

If you want to go pout and vote for someone who has no chance of winning by all means do so.  I believe in your right and will fight for your right to do so.Again! your using words like pout, and whine, when the words should be......protesting, and (Exhibit) Displeasure.

But just like my kids and the movies you've only got two real options that may come true.  You can push for the third all you want but reality is reality.  Casting a vote for Ron Paul and thinking he has any chance to win is nothing but deluding yourself and handing an extra vote to the more liberal party.It's really not about Paul! Those of us, that truly love freedom, know Paul was fighting an uphill battle from the start.What Paul did was awaken (SOME) people, that were unaware of the two parties actually being only one big snake, with the desire to enslave us, along with the rest of the world.Neither party has respected the Constitution for many, many years.You cannot have a winner with either Mitt or Obama. To think so is........Delusional!

Do I like Romney?   Absolutely not.
Do I trust him?  Of course not.
Does he scare me less than Obama?  You bet your britches.He should scare you even more!His side establishes draconian departments like the DHS, and invades sovereign nations at the drop of a hat.The other side just goes along with the Neo-cons war operations and works on using the set up Agencies like the DHS, FEMA and others to strip a few more freedoms from us.

If I thought voting for Fred Flinstone would keep those two out of office, I'd do it. He wouldn't win, but he would be a much better choice ;)

Since I'm back on my soapbox I'll throw this out.  It is a very irresponsible and childish to know as an adult with obligations to look at a situation that only has certain possible outcomes and hold your breath for something different. That is why freedom loving people never hold their breaths and are very vocal about getting the word out. It works! More and more are seeing the folly of voting for these establishment figureheads.

How many times have we said that balancing the budget is simple, don't spend more than you make? No argument there!

And now folks are wanting to spend political currency they don't have.

Do you think you are going to fix all the constitutional issues by refusing to vote for Romney?By voting for neither is a good start.

If you truly care that much, get off your butt and run for office because no one on this forum is arguing that they haven't violated our constitution. You are assuming no one on this forum has ever ran for public office, or campaigned for someone who has?

But that started long ago.  I never had my true 2nd amendment rights.  They were gone before I was born.Again common ground! They have been chipping away at them for a long time.

So have I read it.  Yeah and I live it.   I don't think my view is the only allowed one.  Only thing on this forum that gets me wrapped around the axle is if you are contemptuous of my country or try to step on MY rights while I'm defending yours.  So many people forget that.  The fact that the constitution applies on both sides of the aisle.I think you confuse being contemptuous of the Government as the same as country.

I believe in our constitution and the system it established.  I get sick and tired of people who abuse it and the others who put it down.  I get sick of people who whine about losing their rights and are too lazy to write their representatives "because it won't matter anyway."Probably most people on the forum write and email their reps. I know I do.......Often.

Dang it.  Someone here get off your butt and run for office during the next election. 

It reminds me of folks that were so shocked because someone called the state police on some over zealous local LEOs and the state actually did something about it.

Things don't change unless someone changes them.Right you are! As long as we keep electing the same old two party favorites, nothing will change for the good.

Ron Paul is unelectable.  Work to find someone with the same message who has a chance. I don't think Paul will run as a third party candidate, but the Libertarian, and Constitution party will be represented on most ballots.One of them will get my vote, and I will have exercised my right to vote, and will feel good with my decision. By the way! Welcome to the forum.
     
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline thumper113

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 468
  • Gender: Male
Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #48 on: September 09, 2012, 07:35:47 AM »
Nw_hunter, if anyone does run from here, let us know.  Campaigns don't run without contributions.

In the end, as long as everyone gets out and votes is what counts.

As far as confusing our government and our country, nope.  Don't confuse the idiot in office with our government.

It's like a church and the pastor.  The pastor's not the church, the people are.
God Bless Our Troops!

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #49 on: September 09, 2012, 12:00:36 PM »
NW, delusional is a very descriptive word.

delusional is watching someone vote to take the rights of parents of underage children and call it constitutional.
delusional is watching someone vote to bankrupt a company who makes legal products by allowing frivolous lawsuits and calls it constitutional.

you will notice that neither of those have been struck down by the courts, so a nay vote must be against freedom and commerce.

delusional is watching a congressman steal money from the entire nation of tax-payers to pay for political favors and pretend  the crime didn't happen.

these are also the same folks that would let California take our friends guns and call it a state issue.
JUST EXACTLY WHAT AND FOR WHOM IS THE CONSTITUTION???
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31290
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #50 on: September 09, 2012, 02:16:51 PM »
  The Libertarian & Constitution parties are in existence..and so is the Tea Party.  the former two have some worthwhile goals, almost all of which the Tea party agrees with.  The foirmer 2 have trudged along for years on the margins..but the Tea Party has caught fire..  Why not go with the Tea Party..what do you find wrong with their goals..please be specific.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #51 on: September 09, 2012, 03:23:36 PM »
NW, delusional is a very descriptive word.

delusional is watching someone vote to take the rights of parents of underage children and call it constitutional.
delusional is watching someone vote to bankrupt a company who makes legal products by allowing frivolous lawsuits and calls it constitutional.

you will notice that neither of those have been struck down by the courts, so a nay vote must be against freedom and commerce.

delusional is watching a congressman steal money from the entire nation of tax-payers to pay for political favors and pretend  the crime didn't happen.

these are also the same folks that would let California take our friends guns and call it a state issue.
JUST EXACTLY WHAT AND FOR WHOM IS THE CONSTITUTION???

OK Bugeye so you finally admitted that it's never OK to violate the Constitution. Ron Paul voted no on the underage child abortion bill because of the 10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

You say the Ron Paul is wrong in this case and you also stated that it's never OK to violate the Constitution. Prove that he is wrong by pointing out the section in the Constitution that gives the federal government the power to regulate abortion.

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #52 on: September 09, 2012, 03:42:25 PM »
  The Libertarian & Constitution parties are in existence..and so is the Tea Party.  the former two have some worthwhile goals, almost all of which the Tea party agrees with.  The foirmer 2 have trudged along for years on the margins..but the Tea Party has caught fire..  Why not go with the Tea Party..what do you find wrong with their goals..please be specific.


The top five political parties in the U.S. are the Democrat, Republican, Libertarian,Green and the Constitution Parties.In that order The original Tea party was Hi-Jacked by the Republican Party. The Boston Tea party formed in 2006 to 2012 is no longer functional.Which Tea party would you be talking about?.......Please be specific!
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26939
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #53 on: September 09, 2012, 06:22:18 PM »
Ron Paul was not wrong to vote the way he did. He has consistently voted for the US Constitution. The federal government DOES NOT have the authority to decide the issue, only the states and the PEOPLE do. It is simply not a federal matter.

That's the problem with this country now the federal government has usurped powers the Constitution does not give to it and the states and the people of this country have done nothing to stop them.

States need to stand up in unison and tell the feds where to stick their rules and laws that are unConstitutional rather than depending on a Supreme Court that has sold out to the cabal. Next time a one one is appointed you can kiss the Constitution goodbye because they will never again rule in favor of the citizens of this country and it's our own damn fault for letting them do it gradually over the last 50 years or so.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #54 on: September 09, 2012, 11:54:20 PM »
what is the purpose of the constitution when a citizens rights are taken?  or the right of a company to make legal products.?

states all over this country are infringing on the rights supposedly guaranteed by THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
the congress should be able pass laws that enforce the constitution.
what about an unborn babys right to life. some of you will murder on demand.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #55 on: September 10, 2012, 12:24:45 AM »
what is the purpose of the constitution when a citizens rights are taken?  or the right of a company to make legal products.?

states all over this country are infringing on the rights supposedly guaranteed by THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
the congress should be able pass laws that enforce the constitution.
what about an unborn babys right to life. some of you will murder on demand.

 
Firearms companies were looking for a free pass, they need to be held responsible for defective products like anyone else. I know there were other factors, people wanting to sue over deaths from good funtioning guns,  but that's the basics in that case.
 
As for killing unborn babies.....perhaps we need to review the bidding on who has actually signed baby killing into law and who has stated very vehemenantly that he would defend the practice? ::)  ......and who flip flops all over the place like a crappie out of water?
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #56 on: September 10, 2012, 01:22:22 AM »
what is the purpose of the constitution when a citizens rights are taken?  or the right of a company to make legal products.?

states all over this country are infringing on the rights supposedly guaranteed by THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
the congress should be able pass laws that enforce the constitution.
what about an unborn babys right to life. some of you will murder on demand.

 
Firearms companies were looking for a free pass, they need to be held responsible for defective products like anyone else. I know there were other factors, people wanting to sue over deaths from good funtioning guns,  but that's the basics in that case.
 
As for killing unborn babies.....perhaps we need to review the bidding on who has actually signed baby killing into law and who has stated very vehemenantly that he would defend the practice? ::)  ......and who flip flops all over the place like a crappie out of water?
every company that has a defective product IS held responsible. gun and ammo makers were being sued because their products worked as advertised.  and you cannot accuse me of flippiing on the abortion issue.  it is murder and the democrats and libertarians condone it, so under Gods law, those people are guilty of murder.
people other than me nominated Romney to go up against hussein, and since husseins record shows that he voted to allow the murder of babies that lived through abortion, how can you suggest that I not vote, or vote 3rd party, which would essentially give a vote to hussein.
since there are only two candidates, I will try to possibly save an innocent life by voting republican.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #57 on: September 10, 2012, 03:37:11 AM »

 
As for killing unborn babies.....perhaps we need to review the bidding on who has actually signed baby killing into law and who has stated very vehemenantly that he would defend the practice? ::)  ......and who flip flops all over the place like a crappie out of water?

people other than me nominated Romney to go up against hussein, and since husseins record shows that he voted to allow the murder of babies that lived through abortion, how can you suggest that I not vote, or vote 3rd party, which would essentially give a vote to hussein.
since there are only two candidates, I will try to possibly save an innocent life by voting republican.


ROFMDO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you trying to tell us you REALLY don't know? Your REPUBLICAN candidate signed into law one of the most ornerous assault weapons bans in the historyof this country! And he has clearly stated with great conviction that he would support a womans "right to kill her baby"!

And now when he wants to lead the republicans he flips & flops. And he's done it more than once, depending on who his audience is!

NO! I don't believe you can be that dense! You are pulling a long bow to support your position....that is surely why !

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #58 on: September 10, 2012, 03:55:43 AM »

 
As for killing unborn babies.....perhaps we need to review the bidding on who has actually signed baby killing into law and who has stated very vehemenantly that he would defend the practice? ::)  ......and who flip flops all over the place like a crappie out of water?

people other than me nominated Romney to go up against hussein, and since husseins record shows that he voted to allow the murder of babies that lived through abortion, how can you suggest that I not vote, or vote 3rd party, which would essentially give a vote to hussein.
since there are only two candidates, I will try to possibly save an innocent life by voting republican.


ROFMDO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you trying to tell us you REALLY don't know? Your REPUBLICAN candidate signed into law one of the most ornerous assault weapons bans in the historyof this country! And he has clearly stated with great conviction that he would support a womans "right to kill her baby"!

And now when he wants to lead the republicans he flips & flops. And he's done it more than once, depending on who his audience is!

NO! I don't believe you can be that dense! You are pulling a long bow to support your position....that is surely why !

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D
I know all about it.  Romney said he's changed his position. RP and hussein will continue to advocate abortion. hussein will do it openly, RP will continue to lie about it which makes hussein the most honest of the two.  of course YOU'VE never changed your mind about anything, right??
if you checked my sig line, you would see an extremely liberal voting record.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rand Paul warns of possible obummer win caused by 3rd parties.
« Reply #59 on: September 10, 2012, 04:26:16 AM »
Well! There you have it. He changed his mind (Romney) lol!
I think it's our duty to try and shed light on the truth. To try and open eye's that somehow need a little help in seeing it There are times however when trying to do so is (futile) A waste of breath,and time. I think this is one of those times. ;)
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.