Debates are for the undecided

[Mike in Virginia]

If not, why the heck do they have them?  I think a person who has not decided by now is not intelligent.  In this election, we have a clear cut choice and it's my opinion that anyone with even a low to moderate IQ would know which way he is going. 
I suppose it's worthwhile to the candidates to address those on the fence, but lordy I hate to think the fate of the nation is resting in the putrified brains of sub-humans who can't decide if they should go pee or not.     
And why do they use liberal media moderators for the debates? 
By the way, I don't like either candidate; at least I'm sure of that. 
Rush Limbaugh said a person who is undecided is too stupid to vote. 

[yellowtail3]

If not, why the heck do they have them?

probably because it mostly motivates each candidates' own likely supporters to get the polls, and because people are expecting debates.

I think a person who has not decided by now is not intelligent.

Some are, some aren't. More accurately than not intelligent... they're just not ideologues.

By the way, I don't like either candidate; at least I'm sure of that.

we have something in common; I was rootin' for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson.
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/

Rush Limbaugh said a person who is undecided is too stupid to vote.

yeah, well... Limbaugh is a bloviating blowhard with an overinflated opinion of his own opinion. I wasted waaaaay too many hours listening to him in the 90s.