Assault magazine...that's a good one. Then again, if you load it up and put it in a sock, you could really whack someone with it.
This whole thing reminds me of a debate I once had with a family member about this. I laid out my old standard AR, an AWB friendly Ruger Ranch rifle, and a Ruger 10/22. While supposedly being "pro-gun," but against assault weapons and high capacity mags, they couldnt even tell me which one was or was not an assault rifle, based on the 1994 definition. The only remark was that they all looked "dangerous" when they had a 30 round magazine in them.
I guess the thing that bugs me is that, despite the facts, politicians that want to ban guns simply grab for the lowest hanging fruit - things that "look dangerous." I don't think politicians are stupid. I think they are very aware that incidents with so-called assault weapons and magazines are exceedingly rare. They're also aware that banning guns requires an uneducated population to support them. "Assault weapons," since they don't have universal support from all pro-gun people, is just a logical first step to a larger agenda.
Anyway, I've rambled about this long enough. I think I'll step down from my soap box before I get this thread kicked into the conspiracy theory forum...