Author Topic: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate  (Read 800 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Parrott-Cannon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Gender: Male
Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« on: December 03, 2012, 07:20:40 AM »
I burned FG black powder (90 grains) in clear plastic tubes, ½ inch in diameter and 1 1/8 inches long.  I video the burns at 1200 frames per second and initiated the burns with cannon fuse.  The fuse was placed at the bottom, top and middle of the powder column.  A new tube was used for each replicate and fuse position.  The following are the average (5 replicates) mass burn rates under the conditions described:
When the fuse was located at the bottom of the tube the powder burnt at 1240 grains per second.  Shortly after ignition the powder column was pushed from the tube and burn very rapidly.
When the fuse was located at the middle of the tube the powder burnt at 610 grains per second.  The powder column above the fuse was ejected from the tube shortly after ignition and burned very rapidly.  The powder below the fuse did not start burning until the ejection of the powder above the fuse and then burn down the tube.
When the fuse was located at the top of the tube the powder burnt at 281 grains per second.  The powder burnt down the tube with no ejection of powder particles.
While these results can not be directly related to velocity they indicate black powder at least in a chamber environment and at atmospheric pressure can burn at different rates depending on the ignition point.
 
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security. (Thomas Jefferson)

Offline jeeper1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 662
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2012, 08:21:58 AM »
Interesting.
Videos would be nice and very interesting to watch.
I may not be completely sane, but at least I don't think I have the power to influence the weather.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12608
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2012, 09:00:48 AM »
 
 
I think understand your grain rate per second to mean how many grains (weight) of powder  burns in a second-correct?

Offline Parrott-Cannon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2012, 04:25:18 PM »
Thank you for the suggested wording change.  Yes it is a mass burn rate of grains (weight) per second.
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security. (Thomas Jefferson)

Offline Artilleryman

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1378
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2012, 04:42:31 PM »
I find this very interesting.  I was wondering what would happen if there was a projectile or wadding.
Norm Gibson, 1st SC Vol., ACWSA

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2012, 05:27:40 PM »
Parrott-Cannon,
Here's a blast from the past that contains a couple historical references related to your topic. 

http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php?topic=174589.0
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline Joe111

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2012, 04:27:53 AM »
I find this very interesting.  I was wondering what would happen if there was a projectile or wadding.

Shouldnt change the burn rate. Not much at least. Residence time is too short.

Offline Joe111

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2012, 03:56:12 AM »
I found this millitary test on blackpowder.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a129087.pdf

Offline Parrott-Cannon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ignition Point vs Mass Burn Rate
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2012, 11:23:40 AM »
I find this very interesting.  I was wondering what would happen if there was a projectile or wadding.

Shouldnt change the burn rate. Not much at least. Residence time is too short.
The initial burn rate is affected by the number of particles ignited, the flame propagation rate and the burn rate of the powder particles.  The burn rate is impacted by the pressure.  The initial pressure is the atmospheric pressure, the resistance of the projectile due to friction, and the mass of the projectile per square inch.  As the powder burns it produces gases, when the pressure exceeds the initial pressure the projectile begins to move.  In a chambered weapon the pressure drops at the initial movement of the projectile due to the increased volume experienced by the gases and the burn rate changes.
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security. (Thomas Jefferson)