I got into the Max to resolve a long throat in a factory 357 Magnum barrel. I got the gun as a plinker, and found I couldn't keep 5 shots on a paper plate at 50 yards :eek: No way was I going to get beer can accuracy. Several folks on another board were discussing this same problem, fix being the rechamber. And boy did it fix it. I have no trouble shooting 1.5" at 75 yards, and when I do my part it will shoot into 1" very regular. Regular enough that I don't have a problem calling it a 1" gun. I have loads pushing 180 grain bullets over 2000 fps and a nice plinking load pushing a 158 cast to a mere 915 fps and making 1" groups at 75 yards monotonously. Just the kind of plinking I like.
You are right, in energy figures, it is a ballistic twin of the 41 and 44 mags. In a rifle barrel, it is just like the 44, it performs all out of proportion to its size and paper ballistices. I also have a 44 Handi, purchased both these rifles at the same time, killed deer with each of them this year. I have a 30-30 that may need to be seeking a new home, as 6 months after getting it, I have shot it less than 100 times.
Oh, did I mention that because the 357 Max operates at higher pressures than the 30-30 yet drives the same weight bullets to the same velocities with less powder it recoils less? Noticably so. This would be a far more user friendly chambering for a shooters introduction to centerfires. It is entirely possibe that the 357 Maximum is everything the 30-30 AND 35 Remington ever wanted to be.
If the posts of the past year on this topic mean anything, the NEF 357 Maximum rechamber is only eclisped by the 45-70 in the shear pleasure the owners derive from reloading for it and shooting it. Good Shooting, JP