hillary won't testify before congress on libya, she has a concussion.

[ironglow]

  Yes; it is all about the response to the consulate staff pleas for help..because they were facing iminent destruction by terrorist hands.  So, what did the state dept do to assuage their fears?  They in essence, gave the terrorists an open invitation..
    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2012/1010/House-hearing-weak-security-drawn-down-further-before-Benghazi-attack

[rickt300]

We all know this was a criminal dereliction of duty that went to the top.

[magooch]

And if the top derelect had been a Republican, he/she would already be fighting impeachment charges.

[45-70.gov]

does anyone have a video of
her falling?
where can i get one?
how much does it cost?
does she holler?
can you hear her head hit?

you ask for it...here it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGafFvnUC-I

[magooch]

There are degrees of dereliction and I'll guarantee you that if President Bush had not pursued the path that he chose (along with the majority in Congress) he too would have been accused of being a coward, a sellout and everything else under the sun.  I remember quite well that the loudest voices for going after Saddam Hussein were from Dumycrats; like Senator Rockefeller, Kennedy, the Clintons and others.
As a matter of fact, President Bush might be accused of persuing our enemies, but hardly the opposite as is the case in regard to Benghazi.  You just have to understand the difference between apples and oranges.

[D Fischer]

I'm not sure why anyone cares if she testify's or not. When has a Clinton ever told the truth about anything and when have they suffered any any kind of punishment for lying? In politics, lying is a national tradition!

[mcbammer]

I'm not sure why anyone cares if she testify's or not. When has a Clinton ever told the truth about anything and when have they suffered any any kind of punishment for lying? In politics, lying is a national tradition!

Not  only   a  tradition,  But  a  prerequisite .

[powderman]

There are degrees of dereliction and I'll guarantee you that if President Bush had not pursued the path that he chose (along with the majority in Congress) he too would have been accused of being a coward, a sellout and everything else under the sun.  I remember quite well that the loudest voices for going after Saddam Hussein were from Dumycrats; like Senator Rockefeller, Kennedy, the Clintons and others.
As a matter of fact, President Bush might be accused of persuing our enemies, but hardly the opposite as is the case in regard to Benghazi.  You just have to understand the difference between apples and oranges.

 
MAGOOCH. Well said Sir. POWDERMAN. 

[scootrd]

I wonder now that a Blood clot was found and being treated if Laura will apologize for her  ‘Immaculate Concussion’ comment.

Wouldn't hold my breath.

[rickt300]

And if the top derelect had been a Republican, he/she would already be fighting impeachment charges.

.
 
Uh-huh...like this....
.
.

.
.
...TM7

Actually why aren't we pursuing Ambassador Steven's killers? Have we no responsibility to our diplomatic corps?

[powderman]

Actually why aren't we pursuing Ambassador Steven's killers? Have we no responsibility to our diplomatic corps? 

     RICK. To me at least, it looks as though hussein wanted Stevens dead. He evidently knew something obummer did not want made public. Just my opinion. POWDERMAN. 

[ultramag44]

To get back on topic,

What would it take for the house committee to get a court ordered eveluation of Mrs. Clinton's fitness to testify?                                                                                                                                   

The best medical way would be for 3 independent doctors to exsmine her and not be allowed to see the current medical records. They should be allowed only to see records (for a base line) previous to the alleged fall.

If 3 independent doctors are of the opinion she can testify, then a judge should order her to.

[rickt300]

Actually why aren't we pursuing Ambassador Steven's killers? Have we no responsibility to our diplomatic corps? 

     RICK. To me at least, it looks as though hussein wanted Stevens dead. He evidently knew something obummer did not want made public. Just my opinion. POWDERMAN. 

.
Above is what is known in conspiracy theory studies as 'replacement theory'.  A person replaces current knowledge of a situation with a 'theory' that has no supporting evidence.....to meet a personal agenda.  Contrast this to 911 Truth conspiracy theory studies which has an overwhelming mountain of evidence and timeline that support an alternative storyline actually better than the Offical conspiracy theory.
.

Actually why aren't we pursuing Ambassador Steven's killers? Have we no responsibility to our diplomatic corps?

.
Don't know....don't know they didn't.  Do you have evidence they didn't go after his killers.  Bush didn't go after Bin Laden in earnest,,,said he didn't know where he was or care. ....BHO did though (or so they claim). So I don't know.  Do you know who his 'killers' are specifcally?  Do you know what his business was on that day at the CIA post called a 'consulate'?  Do you know if a stand down actually occurred, or not, or why those CIA agents a mile away didn't ride over there and help there buddies?
.
Just like 911 we got a whole lot of questions to get answered before we aimlessly go off crucifying BHO and shooting up the rest of the world again.  Doncha think?
.
.
.TM7

Now your getting back on topic! In your wildest dream do you think Obama or Hillary will answer any of those questions truthfully? Shooting up the rest of the world, no but shooting up a few local terrorists would be nice (local to Benghazi).

[two-blocked]

Yep, first a concussion then a blood clot, next thing you know........amnesia!