Author Topic: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)  (Read 914 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« on: January 03, 2013, 07:22:59 PM »
So I have a leupold vx-III on my .458 lott, and don't get me wrong it's a great scope, nobody can deny that.


But me being me... I always have to look for something to change. 


I have been looking at the Nikon slughunter.  Definitely looks like a great option... love the nikon BDC.


My leupy has 4.5-3.5'' of relief on it, while the nikon has a static 5"   - That is the main reason for the change.


I have nikons on my -06, and 338 ultra mag, and I trust them with recoil, no questions asked there. 


So I wanted to hear if anybody had used the nikon slughunter and their views on it?  I'm a nikon guys tried and true,,, four nikons and not a single hitch.  Of course my two buschnells and one leupold have never given me any guff either! 
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2013, 07:33:31 PM »
I should add my one reserve about this is giving up my 37-12' FOV on my leupy 2.5-8, for this 25-8' fov on the 3-9 slughunter.
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18258
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2013, 01:44:21 AM »
optics are allways a balancing act. To gain field of view you give up eye relief. 4inches of eye relief is plenty for any gun, even a hard kicker and with a dangerous game gun id rather have the field of view then a bit more eye relief. Another thing with a slug scope is paralex is usually set at 50 yards instead of a 100 like on a conventional scope. Personaly with 458 that wouldnt bother me as it still will be plenty accurate at any range your going to shoot something the size of what that rifle is designed to shoot. Id dont think that a bullet drop compensating reticle is what id want on a dangerous game gun. Simple is better for that purpose and i doubt your going to use a 458 for any long range hunting chores anyway. As to quality, reliability and optical performance its probably about a toss up between those two scopes. I havent actually looked through a nikon slug scope but ive got enough nikons to know that there comparable to my leupolds in those aspects. I guess my final answer would be this. You allready have the scope on it that about 90 percent of big bore users put on there dangerous game guns, a leupold. IF i had to suggest a change it would be to swap it out for a 1.5x5 vx3.
 
blue lives matter

Offline anweis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2013, 07:31:53 AM »
I have that scope, but the 1.6-5x36 version with Nikoplex, on a .50 inline. I choose it because of the long fixed eye relief. My inline has a stock which makes muzzle jump quite excessive and i feel better with the scope further away from my face.
The scope is excellent. Mechanically is as tough as a tank. I washed it with warm water under a kitchen sink many times, i changed and adjusted the zero on it several times, and the scopes keeps tracking true and holding zero. I used it from 110F to insanely cold, and it held up.
The optics on it are very good, the scope would show you game in any conditions between "sunrise-30" and "sunset+30", but the contrast in the image is not quite up there with the Monarch or Conquest scopes, especially in dense brush with bright and dark patches, low angle sunlight in your eyes, etc. What you have to have in mind, though, is that the 5" of ER come at the expense or reduced field of view. My scope has quite a bit of "looking through a straw effect". However, the image is quite flat and sharp to the edge, so not too bad.   The less than perfect contrast in the image and reduced FOV make this scope unsuitable for dangerous game hunting. I would not trust it to go after a buff in dense scrub in poor light. I would trust it for a deer or elk hunt of a lifetime.
 

Offline anweis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2013, 03:22:49 AM »
Lloyd is absolutely right. I believe, however, that the Slug scopes by Nikon have a paralax set at 75 yards, which would not make any difference anyway.
I would suggest that the Nikon Monarch African 1-4x20, or it's larger and slightly better brother in 30mm (24mm lens), with German no 4 reticle would be one of the best reasonably priced choices for that .458. I have that scope and it is outstanding.

Offline Dave in WV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2162
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2013, 03:33:15 AM »
I like Nikon scopes. If I could get the reticles I like in a Nikon I could be just as happy with them as a Leupold, maybe more.
Setting an example is not the main means of influencing others; it is the only means
--Albert Einstein

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: Dear leupold fans.... don't vomit on this thread. ;)
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2013, 03:09:00 PM »
I like Nikon scopes. If I could get the reticles I like in a Nikon I could be just as happy with them as a Leupold, maybe more.

I'm with you... I like my nikon's better than this leupy.... hence the dilemma!
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."