Author Topic: A Cannon Discovery Trip  (Read 6998 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #30 on: February 26, 2013, 11:37:37 AM »
    Here are the last few pics of the seacoast howitzer and the BIG surprise.  If we did not have a routine by which to inspect these cannons, we would not have made the big discovery.  The picture taking routine takes in the Breech, muzzle, right side from far back to get whole length, right trunnion face, left trunnion face, top view whole gun, top view around trunnions, top view of reinforce, top view of muzzle ring or astragal with fillets, any markings where ever they are, and detail shots like the special sight we found on this gun.

    Please don't panic when you see the big surprise, remember it's just an image.

T&M


Located near the breech, on a concrete slab, this plaque gives some local history of the howitzer.




Muzzle face with  Registry No. 6 and initials  G. B.  A famous ordnance inspector, George Bomford inspected ordnance from 1810 to 1848.  He must have loved his work!




Be sure to click on the image to make it larger to see the cracks in the shell.

The Big Surprise!  A method used many years ago to prevent prank firing of publicly displayed cannon.  If we did not have our photograph routine to follow, we might have missed this entirely.  We Always get the flash shot of the bore bottom.  It's tricky to do with some cameras on the small bores like 6 Pdrs., but it's possible.  We did not see anything until we were in Hays, Kansas miles and miles from Newton.  Once loaded to the computer it jumped right out!  I said to Mike,  "LOOK AT THIS!"  He pried himself away from O'Riley and took a look.  He said, "just an alternative method of "spiking" the gun" looks like they rammed it hard against the chamber and gave it a few more whacks to crack the shell (there are 4 radiating cracks from the fuze hole) to make it almost impossible to remove without special equipment".  I agreed.





     Well that's it, do you agree with our assessment of this "spiking" method??

Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline KABAR2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #31 on: February 26, 2013, 12:28:57 PM »
I see they also took a sample out of the muzzel face.... I think your hypotisis is sound on spiking method.... although one might be tempted to lay some powder in the shell and plug it with a fuze to crack the egg so to speak.... not so much to blow it up but to fracture it so it could be removed.... they should have pointed the hole down to keep creative people from such an attempt....
Mr president I do not cling to either my gun or my Bible.... my gun is holstered on my side so I may carry my Bible and quote from it!

Sed tamen sal petrae LURO VOPO CAN UTRIET sulphuris; et sic facies tonituum et coruscationem si scias artficium

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12609
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #32 on: February 26, 2013, 01:10:20 PM »
It appears to my eye that is a snug fitting piece of wood-oak maybe,  forced down the hole and then a taperd bar was put in the center and whacked with a mallet.   Is that correct.

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #33 on: February 26, 2013, 05:01:20 PM »
Might be some of the design history on page 99 but sounds like a shell gun?
ten inch calibre keyword
http://books.google.com/books?id=fbI-AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA99&dq=10-in+cannon+1844+algers&hl=en&sa=X&ei=KH8tUcTqOIio8ASuwoAg&ved=0CEcQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=ten%20inch%20calibre&f=false
 
 "Perote Sand Battery" at Fort Barrancas at the entrance to Pensacola Bay, FL. This battery is composed of two 10-inch Columbiads

 
Page 85-specimens for testing (the dimple on muzzle face) and a ton of other info.
http://books.google.com/books?id=EPtBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA85&dq=report+of+extreme+proof+of+cannon+under+hydrostatic+pressure+1844&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BhIuUce0L8240gGU-oDIBg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=specimens%20for%20testing&f=false



 

Offline little seacoast

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
  • Gender: Male
  • Let them get just a little closer...
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2013, 05:02:10 AM »
M&T, To what do you atribute the remarkable state of preservation of this piece? Almost no visible corrosion externally or in the bore. 
America has no native criminal class except Congress.   Sam Clemens

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2013, 07:02:52 AM »
Skidmark,
Once again, you're right on top of the case, both with the book find and the photo (good work).
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #36 on: February 27, 2013, 09:55:49 AM »
     Yesterday I wrote:  "Here are the last few pics of the seacoast howitzer and the BIG surprise."  This statement was not quite true and I do apologize for the omission of the photo below.  More encyclopedias, reference books, reference sites and artillery lists have the weight wrong on this 10" Seacoast Howitzer which is sometimes refferred to incorrectly as a Columbiad.  Now you have up-to-date information from 1844 per the founder, Cyrus Alger & Company of Boston, Mass.  It ain't 14,500 Lbs, 15,500 Lbs or any of those guesses. The marking is on the breech surface just to the right of the rack holder.

Tracy

The omitted marking.




Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #37 on: February 27, 2013, 05:24:57 PM »
      KABAR2,    You noticed the "Test Scar" left after a "Density Coupon" and a "Tensile Test Specimen" and fine iron filings for chemical tests were removed from the hole.  The hole was trepanned or drilled with a core drill, then wedged to break it out the piece for testing. Tensile tests were accomplished by pulling a specimen of the cast iron apart to measure the force required and any reduction in  diameter of the broken pieces.  Density testing used specific gravity calculation to measure compactness or density of the coupon to predict soundness and probable strength of the casting.  Interesting to me is how these holes were later filled.  For more years than I'd care to admit, I thought that what you saw was what was left after the coupon was broken out.  Until I bought The Big Guns  by Olmstead, Stark and Tucker, in 2005, I did not know that a moistened mixture of sal-ammoniac and fine iron filings was placed in the test scar recess and chemical action firmly cements the material to the cavity.  About 3,000 such tests were accomplished between 1835 and 1846.  Louis Walbach's report in 1847 conclusively proved that the endurance of  "Cold Blast"  cast iron was vastly superior to the less costly,  "Hot Blast" cast iron which most foundries used.
 
 
      Double D.,   Mike and have looked at this image and a larger one at the highest level of enlargement without distortion and we still conclude that it is a 10" shell that was placed against the chamber and then rammed with an iron bar to fracture the shell.  We have asked several younger people to look at it, saying only,  "What object do you see at the bottom of this cannon barrel?"  "A cannon ball" was the response each time.  There are several other reasons we believe this is a shell and not a wood plug.  If you were to use a wood plug, why the heck would you bother to paint it black?  A little paint is not going to save it from rotting after a few years of weather exposure.  The fact that wood rots is another reason.  Nobody is going to build a fire in the bottom of a cannon's bore today to burn out a wood plug, but water exposure will do a complete job in a few short years.  Also is the fact that we did not make up the cannon shell method of permanent spiking, it is right out of Gibbon's Artillery Manual:
 
 "To spike a piece, or to render it unserviceable, drive into the vent a jagged and hardened steel spike with a soft point, or a nail without a head; break it off flush with the outer surface, and clinch the point inside by means of the rammer. Wedge a shot in the bottom of the bore by wrapping it with felt, or by means of iron wedges, using the rammer or a bar of iron to drive them in; a wooden wedge would be easily burnt by means of a charcoal fire lighted with the aid of a bellows".
 
      When they spiked this particular howitzer, it was probably done at the arsenal from which it was issued, where cannon balls of every size would have been available in 1899.  The town committee probably requested a "permanent" spiking to protect their more mischievous citizens on the 4th of July.  Well, that is our considered opinion on the subject.
 
 
      Skidmark,  It took me about 20 seconds to grab that Pensacola image and download it into our Historic Photo Archive.  A Great photo of our howitzer in a historical battery which is documented in several other photos showing different cannon.  It's a very interesting place to visit.  My uncle lives very close to Ft. Barrancas and I have visited it several times.  The water battery where the howitzer appears to be lies in front of and below it in elevation.  I believe there is a tunnel connecting the two.  Thanks for the info on Colonel Bomfords efforts as well.  Great stuff!
 
 
 

 
 M&T, To what do you atribute the remarkable state of preservation of this piece? Almost no visible corrosion externally or in the bore. 
 

 
      Pete, the whole gun is covered in rust, inside and out.  However it is a fine, non-active, non-flaking rust similar to what you would find on an old "Brown Bess" musket.  We believe this gun is in such good shape due to it's never having been issued to any seacoast fort or salt water battery anywhere and also the lack of any effect by the very dry climate in Newton, Kansas.  You would find all kinds of dings and dents from transportation and training use if it had been issued.  65 years of arsenal storage and 114 years on display in Newton, KS, that's what kept it in nearly perfect condition.  Being in a popular, centrally located, park adjacent to the town's library kept it well oiled by kids who rode it, climbed on it and pawed it for over one hundred ten years.  Once lightly rusted then oiled, you have excellent protection from active rusting.

Tracy & Mike
   
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12609
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #38 on: February 27, 2013, 05:52:43 PM »
Thanks, Tracy you guys were looking at it closeup, I was looking at from 7000 miles away

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #39 on: February 28, 2013, 03:06:28 AM »
M & T can you post a picture of  "the official drawing from US Archives and displayed in  The Big Guns, Seacoast, Siege and Naval Guns of the Civil War  by Olmstead, Stark and Tucker"

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #40 on: February 28, 2013, 07:02:02 AM »
      Oh, now I understand, Double D., if you called before you left, I apologize for not answering; we have been completely off-center lately due to last minute details having to do with the 7" Brooke delivery trip and haven't answered messages in at least a week, then my cell phone crapped out early in the trip.  We send our very best wishes to you as you pursue your great foreign adventure!

     Sorry Skidmark, we can't do that due to Museum Restoration Services copywrite of the material.  That is one outfit which will come after you, we have heard.  Those Canadians are hard nosed business people.  I know a bit about them as they own half the commercial property in Denver!  We will, however, send you a copy of ours after we find the time to convert our field drawing into an engineering drawing.  Anyone who is really interested in one can write us a note telling us their mailing address and why they want one.  Our mailing address is in our web site under Contact Us.

Mike and Tracy


Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline de_lok

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 309
  • Gender: Male
  • ICW
    • My Photo Album
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #41 on: March 01, 2013, 08:25:48 PM »
Finally got my laptop fixed! While Mike and Tracy were visiting last week the conversation got on my TC Triumph muzzle loader and Mike was interested in its accuracy. When I told him how tight the groups were and the load I used he leaned back, raised one eyebrow, and called me out! "Did you take any pictures of the targets?" I responded with "Heck Yea!!!", then reached down to pick up my laptop to show him a pic and BAM, the screen popped and went black. Well it was a little embarrassing not being able to back up all that talk! ha ha............... The power cord shorted and shorted the power jack inside the pc at the same time. Parts were ordered and I got it back togather tonight, and was able to find this in my picture folder........................ This one's for you Mike.......
 

.50 cal TC Triumph group @ 100 yards (using a Bushnell rangefinder)
 
I took a lot of pictures while they were here, especially at Shiloh National Military Park, and will now be able to edit and post some of them. One of the most interesting to me was the 8 inch siege howitzer facing the Tennessee River. I would like to find info on what type carriages were used for these tubes..............................
 

8 in Siege Howitzer
 
Dewayne

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12609
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #42 on: March 01, 2013, 11:46:00 PM »
AOP has complete plan sets for the 8 inch Siege howitzer including it heavy siege carriage.   


Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #43 on: March 02, 2013, 12:06:02 AM »
"I would like to find info on what type carriages were used for these tubes............."

The M1841 8-inch siege howitzer was mounted on the U.S. siege carriage.

Army Ordnance Manual published 1850, p.44
http://books.google.com/books?id=g4XcbT6OlhQC&lr=&pg=PA44#v=onepage&q&f=false

RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #44 on: March 02, 2013, 01:09:06 AM »
Does anybody have a pic of the historical specs of the 10-inch heavy seacoast howitzer, Model of 1842 like cannoneer posted from public archives?
I found at port hudson they had two 10" guns, one of them was famous that had two names which wasn't like this one.
The other 10" was noted to be different and never seen before but I can't find a pic of it.
The General there was trying hard to get the guns from Pensacola sent to his fort.
 
Update on Fort Barrancas
Army Lieutenant Adam J. Slemmer, commander of the 1st U.S. Artillery at Fort Barrancas, realized that if war proved inevitable and Southern forces attacked, his small force of 51 men could not possibly defend all four garrisons. On Jan. 10, 1861, the same day Florida seceded from the Union, Slemmer spiked the guns at Fort Barrancas, blew up ammunition at Fort McRae and concentrated all his troops at Fort Pickens, which he believed was the key to the defense of Pensacola Harbor. Two days later, Slemmer’s men watched as Southern soldiers moved into the other forts across the channel. When, on Jan. 15, soldiers from Florida and Alabama demanded the surrender of Fort Pickens, Lieutenant Slemmer refused. Within days the two sides reached a truce in which the South agreed not to attack Fort Pickens and the North would not reinforce the fort.
 

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #45 on: March 02, 2013, 03:17:33 PM »
Does anybody have a pic of the historical specs of the 10-inch heavy seacoast howitzer, Model of 1842 like cannoneer posted from public archives?

Skidmark,
If you're referring to the barrel seen on a siege carriage in Plate 7, I believe that's a drawing of a 24-pounder iron siege gun, pattern of either 1840 or 1845. That's the same 24-pounder that's referenced on page 44 of the manual, as fitting the same size siege carriage as the M1841 8-inch siege howitzer. By the way, the latter is called the 8-inch siege howitzer, pattern/model of 1840, in some references.
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #46 on: March 02, 2013, 03:57:24 PM »
Cannoneer, I am refering to the10-Inch Seacoast Howitzer at the Library in Newton, KS with M&T in reply # 28
M&T are taking actual measurements but I would like to see the historical drawing and AOP don't have one listed.
I am lookin forward to getting M&T's Precision Drawing guaranteed to be within .010
That book you referenced is a good book to have, Thanks!

Offline de_lok

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 309
  • Gender: Male
  • ICW
    • My Photo Album
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #47 on: March 02, 2013, 05:23:18 PM »
"I would like to find info on what type carriages were used for these tubes............."

The M1841 8-inch siege howitzer was mounted on the U.S. siege carriage.

Army Ordnance Manual published 1850, p.44
http://books.google.com/books?id=g4XcbT6OlhQC&lr=&pg=PA44#v=onepage&q&f=false

I was thinking I had seen them on a naval carriage like this one...................


Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #48 on: March 02, 2013, 07:23:05 PM »
I was thinking I had seen them on a naval carriage like this one...................




Well, I'm going to make a leap of faith here, and say that I believe it to be impossible for you to have seen them on a naval carriage like that one; but I do think that it's not only probable, but a certainty that you saw this one 8-inch siege howitzer mounted on this one of a kind marsilly carriage which was made especially for it. 
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #49 on: March 03, 2013, 08:58:28 AM »
     Dewayne,   Mike here. 
     Just took a look at that group you posted, looooks good,,, maybe too good, I noticed that one of the holes had some lead on one side, like maybe it didn't quite stabilize.  At what range were you shooting?  10 yards? 15?  At 50 the bullets should have gone in end on, we need to see more targets to prove your one inch group.  Ha Ha, just chiding you a little, had an excellent time with you and your wife, the visit to Shilo was great, haven't seen as many bronze guns ever in all our travels.


     We brought this forward for a more complete look at what really happened to cause the ship's carpenters to build a modified Marsilly carriage for at least one of the captured 8" Siege and Garrison Howitzers M1840.  The research was completed about 6 years ago, so why reinvent the wheel?   If you like stories about Rebel artillery in action as much as we do, buy Warren Ripley's book, Siege Train, you will very very glad you did!


  It’s a long story, but basically this strange saga started with Federal troops stripping boards off houses in Legareville, a tiny southern town on the Stono River just south of Charleston, South Carolina.  Say what?  That’s right, it started with the Confederates saying,  “They’re stealing our houses!!” 

     The object of this story is two 8-Inch Siege&Garrison Howitzers , Pattern 1840, first authorized to be cast in 1841, the inspiration for the one Ed Hart is making right now, link:  http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php/topic,234355.0.html   Let’s see a photo of the beast in question which is normally mounted on a siege carriage with heavily built, 60” wheels, thanks DD.  How the heck did the Federal Navy come to build a Marsilly carriage for one of these 2,600 pound beasts?


From the Navy Historical Center Washington, DC   The 8" Army howitzer onboard the Federal ship Pawnee in 1863.




     The real question that needs to be answered is this one:  How did the Federal Navy come into possession of two Confederate, 8-Inch Siege Howitzers?  The Rebels were very, I mean Really Upset! about the ‘theft of boards’ from their houses.  They decided to launch an Artillery attack upon the troops doing it and the Federal gunboats supporting them.  We get the following very brief synopsis of events from The Big Guns  by Olmstead, Stark and Tucker:  “Two surviving in Washington Navy Yard, one of them trophy No. 6, are defaced beyond specific identification.  Tredegar Foundry might have cast them from Federal patterns at hand.  Exceptionally complete documentation related their role in defending the southern approaches to Charleston, South Carolina.  Federal troops drove Confederates, commanded by Major Edward Manigault, from both howitzers on Christmas day, 1863.  Their recapture frustrated, they were removed three days later by Union landing parties from U.S. ships Pawnee, Marblehead, and C. P. Williams.”

If you don’t like to read about historical events, you can stop right here.  If you want to find out exactly why ship’s carpenters had to design and build a carriage for a big Army howitzer, read on.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

       The following map from the book, Siege Train, The Journal of a Confederate Artilleryman in the Defense of Charleston,  Edited by Warren Ripley, shows the position of the 8” Howitzers and other significant places mentioned in Maj. Manigault’s Diary. 

A map of Maj. Manigault's area of responsibility for the CSA Artillery Siege Train showing various batteries and significant locations noted in his diary entries pertaining to the CSA Expedition against Federal troops and Gunboats near Legareville.
From  Siege Train edited by Warren Ripley who also wrote Artillery and Ammunition of the Civil War.




      Confederate Maj. Manigault’s diary, which covers the period from July 1863 to August of 1864 provides an extremely detailed, day to day, record of what happened as the Federals laid siege to Charleston, SC and all the forts and batteries surrounding it.  The rebel artillerymen  labored under the morale crushing knowledge that while about 80% of the enemies shells exploded on or at least close to their intended targets, the shells large and small supplied to Confederate artillerymen displayed opposite statistics.  Manigault’s diary records the miserable performance of CSA ordnance.  On average 70 to 80% of CSA munitions were duds!!,  and normally landed short, long or wide of the target.

     From Siege Train we learn this:  “It was known from Capt. Walpole’s Scout Company on John’s Island that the Yankees were pulling down the houses at Lagareville and carrying the Materials over to Kiawah Island to erect buildings for sheltering the troops there.  The party engaged in pulling down these houses was protected by one, or sometimes two, Gunboats anchored just in front of Legareville.

     It was accordingly determined to send an Expedition to endeavour to capture, sink, or cripple the Gunboats, or at least to drive them off, and to capture the party in the village engaged in pulling down the houses.  As our Pickets were tolerably near the village so as to prevent the Yankees from roving about, workmen and laborers were sent down, who constructed two sunken batteries for each of two guns on a peninsula (and masked by a wood), about ¾ mile below Legareville in direct line.  These two Batteries were only 50 to 75 yards apart, both sunken batteries.  Another Battery was constructed 250 to 300 yds. lower down on another peninsula although the distance round by land was probably from 1 to 2 miles.  This battery was a raised battery.  Another platform or battery was said to be placed on the Road in rear of Legareville from which Lagareville might be shelled.

     Col. Page of 56th Virginia regt. Commanded the Expedition composed as follows – 460 Infantry from 56th and 27th Virginia;  Artillery, Co. “A” Siege Train with two 30 Pndr. Parrotts, Co. “B” Siege Train with 4,  8 in. Howitzers, Capt. Schulz’s Light Battery, Captain Charle’s Light Battery, (“Inglis Light artillery”), 1 Seaction of Marion Arty.,Lieut. Strohecker Comdg.; Cavalry, “The Rebel Troop”, “The Cadet Rangers” and Capt. Wahpole’s Company of Mounted Scouts (20) men. 

     Through some mistake Cos. A & B of Siege train received no orders until Tuesday Night 22nd inst. 11 ½   P.M.  They marched before 3 A.M.  Wednesday 23.

     The whole force assembled at (Camp at Walpole’s place about 6 miles from Lagareville and 7 miles beyond Church Flats) on the afternoon of Wednesday 23.  That night and the next day the force rested.

     At dark Thursday 24th, the train moved on and everything was got into position so as to be ready to open fire on the enemy at daylight next morning.  The following was the disposition of the force: Capt. Webb’s 2   30 pndr Parrotts were put in Right one of the Batteries ¾ mile below Legareville and Two of Lieut Nesbit’s 8 in. Howitzers in the left Battery 50 or 100 yards from it.  The third one of Lt. Nesbit’s Howitzers was put in the Lower Battery (250 or 300 yds. lower down) with 3 of Capt. Schulz’s field pieces – Lieut. Spivey in charge of the howitzer (Capt Schulz comdg, the Battery).  The fourth 8 in. Howitzer (under Sergt. Causey) with Section of Marion Artillery on the road in the rear of Legareville in order to shell the village at the proper signal.  Captain Charles’ Battery was put between Legareville and Capt. Webbs 30 pndr Howitzers [should be Parrotts]in order to fire on either the Gunboats or Legareville.

     The Infantry was in the woods closest to Legareville to charge the village as soon as it had been sufficiently Shelled,  and the fire of the gunboats was kept under or drawn away by our own artillery fire.

    There was only one Gunboat (supposed to be the Marblehead) visible.  The night was a brilliantly clear Moonlit night.  Moon full, pretty cold.  At 6 A.M. Webb’s two 30 pndr. Parrotts and Nesbit’s two 8 in. Howitzers opened fire on the gunboat, distance estimated variously at from 600 to 1,000 yds.  Capt. Chrles’ Napoleon guns also opened on the Gunboat.  It was some minutes before Marblehead replied, but the officers all say that when she did her practice was beautiful.  The Pawnee which was lying round a point, and before [she moved] was invisible to our troops, immediately got under way and and ran into the Kiawah River where She took up a position and enfiladed the different Batteries.  A schooner-rigged Gunboat [C. P. Williams] also immediately made sail from her anchorage near Cole’s Island and came to the assistance of the Marblehead.  After about ¾ of an hour the enemies fire became so hot that Col Kemper determined to withdraw the guns. Pvt. Ancrum of Co. “A” had his leg shot off by a shell which killed both of the horses he was driving (he was next to the lead driver of one of the 30 pndr. Parrott Guns.  Webb who was within a few feet of him 9he had gone to the rear by order of Col. Kemper to bring up the horses to carry off the Guns) received a severe concussion from the explosion of the same shell.  Corpl. Bland of the same company was stunned by a concussion.  Private Zorn was shot through the hand by [a] fragment of shell.  One of the other horses of Company “A” was killed, and a fourth wounded, probably mortally.  By great exertions the two 30 pndr. Parrotts were got off.

     One of the 8 in. Howitzers of Lieut. Nesbit was got off;but the other had to be abandoned; as two horses belonging to it were Killed & several wounded and the remainder had run off in great alarm so that it was impossible to get together more than 7 horses with which the first howitzer was got off.  Private W. F. Johnson of Co. “B” was killed instantly by the same shell which killed his two horses.  Several others experienced concussions from bursting of shells near them. 

    The 8 in. Howitzer at the lower Battery under command of Capt. Schultz [Schulz] was also abandoned in consequence of of the breaking of the harness and running away of the horses, who were twice hitched in, and broke away both times; after which Capt. Schultz ordered the howitzer to be abandoned.

     Capt. Charles lost one man killed and one wounded.  The Infantry is said to have done nothing.  In a short time the whole force retreated to Roper’s place 2 ½  or 3 miles in rear of Legareville where they remained until [time omitted in manuscript].  They then went on to Walpole’s place where they had encamped the first night.”

      Our conclusion is that incomplete intelligence about the Federal presence in the area, especially the fact that Confederate forces didn’t know that the Gunboat Pawnee, a 1,289 ton, twin-screw, steamer could enfilade all of their artillery batteries with her 100 pdr. Parrott rifle and 50 pdr. Dahlgren rifle plus eight nasty 9” Dahlgren guns from her anchorage at the confluence of the Stono and Kiawah Rivers with support from the 13” mortar of the schooner C. P. Williams which fired 20 huge mortar shells during the fracas.  With room to maneuver, the gunboat Marblehead swept the Rebel batteries with her repeated broadsides of 24 pdr and 9” smoothbores and 20 pdr. Parrott rifle.  All of these assets combined were more than enough to cause this disaster for the Confederate Expedition, especially the loss of the men and two 8” Siege Howitzers which now reside at the Washington Navy Yard.  It took several days, but the Federal Navy’s sailors finally found creeks which led to one dismounted gun (dismounted by sailors who landed immediately after the Rebel artillerymen withdrew), and came within 100 yds. of the other.  A Confederate plan to haul a sling cart to these locations was not executed in time.  The guns were lost.

Tracy and Mike   


P.S.   Although the Confederate artillerymen hit the Marblehead 20 times, causing some serious damage and wounds to her sailors, they didn’t know this.  All of their ordnance which hit the Gunboat was defective and Did Not Explode!  To add insult to injury, the CSA commanding general ordered Maj. Manigault to have his artillerymen practice shooting weekly at a range near headquarters so he could keep an eye on them.  [/time]
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #50 on: March 04, 2013, 02:56:46 PM »
 
M&T does this look familiar
 

 

 

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #51 on: March 05, 2013, 04:48:41 AM »
     We don't really know, Skidmark, but the first one looks like a 10" Seacoast Howitzer M1842 in a water battery, maybe the Ft. Barancas Water Battery?  Looks like those trees have had a life subjected to almost constant on-shore breezes.

     The second one we don't have a clue, but I noticed two things that are interesting.  One is that, if you enlarge the image by clicking on it, you will be able to see an eccentric roller attached to the bolster, with one eccentric roller handspike sticking out of the eccentric axle hub on the left hand side.  This was engaged after the tube was loaded in the recoil position, so that the upper carriage could be rolled back into battery and then dis-engaged before firing another shot.  Also is the upturned front and rear ends of the side rails on the Chassis which keeps the cannon on the chassis by limiting the progression of the carriage's large front wheel.

     I know that Mike and I saw those features before on a wood, casemate carriage, but where?  After stuffing my son's cat into her cat castle, so her yeowling was muffled and I could think, I remembered, the summer of 2008 in Newport, Rhode Island rubbing elbows with the swells and visiting Ft. Adams on Naragansett Bay.  Here we had a great time teaching the volunteer tour guide all about seacoast artillery and learning lots from him about the fort's architecture.  Great architecture it was, too. Designed by Totten, it was his most complete fortification as far as all the state-of-the-art fort features were concerned.  It had just about everything!  He followed up constantly on that project, making sure his drawings were followed, exactly.

     Here are a couple photos of the casemate carriages we found there representing the 1830 to 1855 era. 

Tracy & Mike


Here is the eccentric roller used to lift the rear of the carriage for it's return to battery.  Same as in the Rebel 10" Howitzer battery pic.




This photo shows the top rail design which is identical to the Condererate battery gun's Chassis rail to keep the gun onboard.


Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline MKlein

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Wetumpka, AL
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #52 on: March 05, 2013, 05:44:42 AM »
Yes, these are from the sand batteries at Fort Barrancas or referenced sometimes as Warrington, FL. So far the best I can tell from lots of reading is that they were replaced by Quaker Guns so the Union wouldn't know they was packing up before they destroyed they navy yard and was ordered to go to Fort Morgan. A photographer named J.D. Edwards took a lot of pictures of this area.
 
I have found that Fort Morgan lists  two different 10-in columbiads 16,000 lbs and 14,000 lbs

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #53 on: March 08, 2013, 04:24:53 PM »
      Just one more from the siege of Vicksburg, Mississippi, fellas.  Despite having more than 100 green guns (bronze field artillery) along the battlefield positions of May, June and July of 1863, we simply, try as we might, could not get too excited about them.  So sticking with seacoast, siege and naval guns, we picked out about a dozen photos of a two wheeled siege carriage mounted, 32 Pdr. seacoast gun, mounted in Siege Battery Benton adjacent to the eastern end of the Old Vicksburg Bridge over the Mississippi  near the southern city limits. 
 
Mike and Tracy
 
This large 6.4-Inch Gun is located on a hill on Navy Circle Road in Battery Benton named after the Federal  ship whose "Acting Master", J. Frank Reed led a mixed Army infantry crew who manned the battery’s guns.  The “Widow Blakely” is 3,000 yards north of here on Louisiana Circle in Riverfront Park.






Mike explains some of the features on this gun to an interested Mississippian who was visiting the Military Park with his family.






 Although this 7,527 pound tube seems a bit heavy for this type of siege carriage, the largest size of 3 separate sizes of siege carriage, was adequate for the job.  The normal distribution of tubes was this:  the smallest size was for the 12 Pdr. siege gun, the medium size was for the 18 Pdr. gun and the largest size supported the 8-Inch siege howitzer or the 24 Pdr. siege gun, and, with modification, the 30 Pdr. Parrott and with certain high strength mods, the 32 Pdr. Seacoast Gun, normally mounted on the Wood, Front-Pintle, Seacoast, Barbette Carriage.  The O.A.L. of this tube is 125.2 inches.  Breech ring is 22.3” Dia.




 
 
 This breech marking indicates the tube’s weight which is 7,527 Lbs.   Trunnion retainers stick up from the trunnion plates.  Designed for use when the carriage and  tube are in a traveling configuration with the tube supported by a cradle on the trail.






The right side of the Cascabel Knob has a III marking.  The meaning of this mkg. is unknown at this time








The marking of 1833 on the left trunnion face is the date of casting of the Model 1829 tube.



 
 
 
The right trunnion face mkg. of WPF stands for West Point Foundry of Cold Spring, New York.



 
 
 
The muzzle face mkg. of W.J.W. stands for the Army Ordnance Inspector who was William J. Worth who inspected Federal ordnance from 1832 to 1838.  The  No.  243  marking is the Registry number.





 
 
A very noticeable mold seam divides this tube’s  acceptance mark, the  U. S., in half, which is located at the end of the  57” long reinforce.



 
 
 
Here is shown the raised vent field, the vent and the mold seam.




 
 
The distinctive shape of the Army 32 and 42 Pdr. Seacoast Gun’s cascabel which includes the curious breeching ring is evident here as well as broken handles on the elevation screw capstan.  Notice how smooth the concrete cheeks are on the replica carriage.



 
 

 You can see here that this carriage has extra “beef” in the cheeks, trail and axle to handle the extra weight of this large tube.





 
The original guns, 42 Pdr. Rifled conversion guns (James System) probably came from one of the sunk ironclads or they could have been borrowed from the Federal Ship Benton.  We took pictures on the Cairo of such rifled 42 Pdrs.



 
 
 
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #54 on: March 09, 2013, 07:48:24 AM »
     The gist of two emails recieved was this:  "isn't the combination of the 32 pounder gun with the siege carriage just something thought up by NPS officials?"

     While we agree that this is not an ideal combination with which to go on campaign.  It must have been far more common than most of us suppose.  With more than 1,100 of this style tube produced by 4 or 5 foundries prior to the Civil War, they made perfect defensive guns for forts when firing huge loads of canister balls or grape shot.  As siege guns, firing at moderate velocity, they could do accurate work with shot and shell at 500 to 1,500 yards.  It only took me about 2 minutes to find a historical photo showing one so situated.

Tracy


There are two Model 1829, 32 Pdr. Seacoast Guns in this 1865 photo taken in Fort Totten in the Washington defenses.  One is on the largest size, Modified Siege Carriage and the other on an Iron, Front-Pintle, Seacoast, Barbette Carriage.  In the "Circle of Forts" surrounding Washington, more that 50 in number, there were many of these guns.  Most were mounted on Wood, Front-Pintle, Seacoast, Barbette Carriages, but some were mounted as this one was, to make the fort's defense more dynamic.  After all this piece could be moved around as needed.  This one was rifled per the James System, but not banded and fired a 64 pound James shell at moderate velocity.  Photo is courtesy the Library of Congress through Wikipedia.


Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline The Jeff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 255
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #55 on: March 09, 2013, 12:23:44 PM »
Thanks for bringing up that picture, Tracy. I was on my way to look for it when I noticed you'd posted it. Here's the link to the picture in the Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/cwp2003004596/PP/ I downloaded the 80mb .tiff version and cropped to just the piece in question.





Something interesting about the one in the historical photo is that it has bands around the breech and just before the muzzle swell which seems to me to be an older design than the one Mike and Tracy saw at the Navy Circle. Leafing through "Arming the Fleet" it looks pretty similar to gun #1 on page 150. The description says it's a 32-pdr of 1823, 60.75 cwt or 6,804 pounds, and 110" length.

Offline Zulu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2477
  • Honor is a gift a man gives himself.
    • Wood & Ironworks
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #56 on: March 09, 2013, 01:06:49 PM »
What is it that is hanging on the cascabel?  Are they primer pouches?  Cartridge boxes?
Zulu
Zulu's website
www.jmelledge.com

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #57 on: March 09, 2013, 02:13:41 PM »
     Thanks so much Jeff for correctly identifying that 32 Pdr. G.I. Navy Gun of 1823.  Your eyes are certainly better than mine!  Looking at your enlargement, I can clearly see the two lines indicating an astragal and fillets just where you indicated.  Page 150, the one on the left sure looks like it.  Also in the The Big Guns  the authors research reveals that between 1817 and 1828 Bellona, Columbia and West Point foundries produced more that 600 recorded 32-pounder and 200 42-pounder Gradual Increase guns.  The 32 pounder guns weighed, on ave., 60 hundredweight, (6,720 pounds) and were 110 inches nominal length.

     In our travels Mike and I remember seeing two of these, one at Old Fort Jackson near Savannah, Georgia and one at Fort McAllister just south of Savannah.  We covered these forts extremely carefully after discovering Fort Pulaski on Cockspur Island at the mouth of the Savannah River.  It is, by far, our favorite fort and we have visited it 3 times since 2002. Just found a photo of the one at Old Fort Jackson on page 48 in The Big Guns.   In that book it says that the 32-pounder of 60 Hundredweight, Gradual Increase was cast in 1824.  That gun has a ring-knob, two astragals with filets, a raised vent field and small rimbases common on guns of the Gradual Increase style.

Anyway, the Siege Carriage, (Modified Large) is able to carry any of these 32 Pdrs. and it actually did.

Tracy
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline seacoastartillery

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2853
  • Gender: Male
    • seacoastartillery.com
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #58 on: March 10, 2013, 08:07:39 AM »

What is it that is hanging on the cascabel?  Are they primer pouches?  Cartridge boxes?

Zulu   


     Sorry, Michael, I didn't see your post when I hit enter on mine.  The best answer in a perfect world would be "Austrian 8mm Ammo in stripper clips Pouch", but since these date back to only 1888, without a time machine, they are out.  You are, of course, correctomundo!  Called a "Primer Pouch" or "Gunner's Tube Pouch", they are carried by the gunner separately from all the equipment in the "Gunner's Haversack" because they are fragile and potentially dangerous if impacted.

Thanks for calling our attention to these, Zulu.

Tracy
Smokin' my pipe on the mountings, sniffin' the mornin'-cool,
I walks in my old brown gaiters along o' my old brown mule,
With seventy gunners be'ind me, an' never a beggar forgets
It's only the pick of the Army that handles the dear little pets - 'Tss! 'Tss!

From the poem  Screw-Guns  by Rudyard Kipling

Offline Zulu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2477
  • Honor is a gift a man gives himself.
    • Wood & Ironworks
Re: A Cannon Discovery Trip
« Reply #59 on: March 10, 2013, 08:36:56 AM »
The gun also appears to have a leather vent cover with strap in place.
Zulu
Zulu's website
www.jmelledge.com