From what I have gathered so far, the Weaver #21 base (this is one short base from a two=piece set) has a mounting diameter of .710".
Right at the middle of my rear sight, I measure .713".
Weaver's base #22 has a mounting diameter of .700". Either would work or maybe both, depending on the amount of taper in the barrel between the two, but I think it's more than the difference between the two. I think it woul dbe best to buy four of the same base so when (not if) I screw one up, it won't matter which one I screw up.
I am not thrilled about having to use two bases but I am going to think about this for a while and decide which way to go.
If I could hold everything still, re-center a scope and mount rings and bases to the scope, then shim, glue, tape, rubber-bad it to the barrel and bore sight it before the "glue" sets (silicone caulk works very well) and then gently remove the rings/scope, I could spot the holes. I have access to a scope ring reamer and lap but have never tried it on the Weaver rings with the steel top strap (my personal preference) so, I would possibly another type of ring so the reamer is not trying to cut two materials with different properties at once. I can deal with steel, I can deal with amuminum, but I don't know if I would try both at the same time on either side of a hole. I used some lightweight Warne aluminum rings on my CZ 452 with which I have been pleased so maybe I will look at them.
This may never materialize because I have to find time to do it, but I shot it with some cast 50 grain FPs over a starting charge of Unique yesterday and it's just the neatest little rifle, so I have some incentive to not get bored with the dream and then sell it. I have had a couple opportunities to move it lately and I decided not to, so the project has some hope. The easier it is, the more likely it will get done and a one-piece base would have sealed the deal. I am NOT ruling out any other ideas at the moment, in fact, I have to measure the barrel on the Rossi pictured above and see if maybe that base might not be the one. That just occured to me.
However this works out, I will share here. I have had horrible trouible with this site lately - taking up to seven minutes to load a page, so be patient. I won't be posting minute-by-minute. No other site I have been to does this and I have not figured it out yet.