Good post JCN.
Obviously, there are some people walking around out there that should not have a gun.. Heck, they shouldn't even be around sharp tools and matches. Problem is, how to honestly determine who is who?
A "Board Review"? What if the "Board" is comprised of folks who believe any person walking the street free is entitled to a gun? Look around you....That is clearly not the case... What if the "Board" feels any Psych. background (divorce counseling, grief counseling, etc..) is reason for automatic refusal?
The devil is in the details, and the question is how do you guarantee an honest "assessment"? I don't know the answer to that one, but human nature being what it is, the opportunity for shenanigans is pretty high.....
Initial hearing with at least two Psych. present? Then, if the person in question wants to challenge the ruling, a hearing with a Judge and Psychiatrist present, along with 12 citizens as peers making the final decision, all paid for by the state? Expensive and time consuming, yes, but what price should we put on the removal of someones Constitutional Rights?
Larry