I think there is a big difference bewteen they parents Can't pay and the parents Will not pay.
If they can't pay there are programs for that, if they can not take care of the kids or will not take care of the kids, is the whole reason we have the foster parent program and Child protective services.
And there is a difference between can't and won't. Can't pay because of loss of job and all money is going to the houseing of the kids, or Won't pay, having different prioritys, buying cable TV rather than school lunches.
Somehow we have a society that has gone from convience to demanding. When I was in school the hot lunch program was there to provide lunches to parents on a government subsidy like food stamps. The cost of the lunch was offset by the convience of other parents by buying the lunch tickets. I had a few in my desk in case I forgot my lunch or we were running late, or it was a good lunch. Some how that program has changed from optional to manditory and the parents have stoped paying as it is manditory.
We have a scociety that now thinks everything should be free, A doctors vist was a co-pay then it was built into the cost of the insurance, then the medicine was a co pay then built into the cost of the insurance, then the cost went up and up to cover al lthe "free things" to the point that no one can afford it any more. And now we want others to pay for everything. As more and more gets to be free the quality fo the fee stuff goes down and down. People used to be greatful for something now they are demanding more telling you they are not happy with the free soup but want Bobby Flay to cook for them and you should pay for the 5 star food.