Nobel comm asks bo for peace prize back. What were they thinking??

[powderman]

 Nobel Committee Asks Obama for Peace Prize Back 05/24/13
From The Final Edition:
Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, said today that President Obama “really ought to consider” returning his Nobel Peace Prize Medal immediately, including the “really nice” case it came in.
 
From Spectator.org:
The party that marched American troops into Meuse-Argonne, Normandy, Iwo Jima, Inchon and Khe Sanh is back with a vengeance under President Barack Obama, who has taken to overseas war-making like a duck to water.
This must have the Nobel Prize committee scratching its collective head.
Obama, who less than nine months after his inauguration won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” while fostering “a new climate” in international relations, especially in reaching out to the Islamic world, has the U.S. engaged in conflicts in six Muslim nations.
 
Today Mr. Obama has more troops in Afghanistan than when he took office. He has widened the use of drones. (The U.S. now has 8,000 of the unmanned remote control planes.) He involved the U.S. military in an undeclared war in Libya, and waged covert wars in Yemen and Somalia. Perhaps most alarming, he is the first U.S. president to authorize the assassination of an American abroad (the New Mexican born Anwar al-Awlaki).
Overseas belligerency is one thing, but Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder has stated that the president has “under extraordinary circumstances” authority to use drone strikes to kill Americans on U.S. soil.
Read more at http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2013/20130524003-nobel-obama-back.html#zwSjo11kEK7yvV2M.99

[blind ear]

He is demonstrating his indisputable power. ear

[nw_hunter]

Personally, I find the prize in a box of cracker Jacks to be more worthy than a Nobel Prize. The Million that goes with it is another story .
They may get him to return the plaque or what ever , but the money B. and M would never consider.

[mcwoodduck]

Personally, I find the prize in a box of cracker Jacks to be more worthy than a Nobel Prize. The Million that goes with it is another story .
They may get him to return the plaque or what ever , but the money B. and M would never consider.

They donated the Moeny to a variety of Democratic front charities like Acorn. 

[powderman]

Personally, I find the prize in a box of cracker Jacks to be more worthy than a Nobel Prize. The Million that goes with it is another story .
They may get him to return the plaque or what ever , but the money B. and M would never consider.

 
HUNTER. The nobel peace prize has been a joke ever since they gave it to the murdering terrorist arafat. POWDERMAN. 

[two-blocked]

Put your hand in the puppets head!
 

 
Can you say "po-lit-ee-cal  sa-tire"?
 
Read the referenced "Final Edition" article
 
From The Final Edition:
 
Those guys at Reagan Coalition sure are dumb!
 
 

[dwalk]

IMO obama deserves nothing...he should hang his head in shame for all he's done...


the best thing he could do for this country is to resign.

[powderman]

Husseins daily war against America should be enough to make him ineligible for the peace  prize. What a sick joke giving it to him was. POWDERMAN. 

[mcwoodduck]

Put your hand in the puppets head!
 

Isn't that how the Liberals control all of their minons? 
Daily talking points for the cable shows and the reporters telling them what they should look at, what they should ignore, and who they should blame?  Yea you're right it is the conservitives that are on message and stay consistant, but they are stupid and the Sheeple of the left are the Smart ones, that do nto think for themselves.
Oh and you may want ot change your picture, Mr Rodgers was a combat vet and very right wing. 

[dwalk]

Put your hand in the puppets head!
 

Isn't that how the Liberals control all of their minons? 
Daily talking points for the cable shows and the reporters telling them what they should look at, what they should ignore, and who they should blame?  Yea you're right it is the conservitives that are on message and stay consistant, but they are stupid and the Sheeple of the left are the Smart ones, that do nto think for themselves.
Oh and you may want ot change your picture, Mr Rodgers was a combat vet and very right wing.

supposedly a SEAL with numerous 'kills'...that was debunked from what i read...

[mcwoodduck]

Put your hand in the puppets head!
 

Isn't that how the Liberals control all of their minons? 
Daily talking points for the cable shows and the reporters telling them what they should look at, what they should ignore, and who they should blame?  Yea you're right it is the conservitives that are on message and stay consistant, but they are stupid and the Sheeple of the left are the Smart ones, that do nto think for themselves.
Oh and you may want ot change your picture, Mr Rodgers was a combat vet and very right wing.

supposedly a SEAL with numerous 'kills'...that was debunked from what i read...

I heard Combat soldier of either Korea or WWII. 
There were quite a few actors that came out of WWII with combat experience like Charles Bronson, Lee Marvin, and from what someone that had a book of all the post war actors said was Mr Rodgers and Captain Kangaroo that surpised me.

[two-blocked]

Is that the same book you get your economic "talking points" from?      Mr. Rogers never served in the military and Captain Kangaroo enlisted at he end of the war and never got to see any action.
 
Google it!
 
 

[mcwoodduck]

Is that the same book you get your economic "talking points" from?      Mr. Rogers never served in the military and Captain Kangaroo enlisted at he end of the war and never got to see any action.
 
Google it!

Actually when I went to go shooting in Turlock one afternoon I drove two hours to the range and when I got there I changed my shoes to boots as the range was muddy, the lady running the range was the one that made the Mr Rodgers comment and her husband is the one that mentioned the book with him in it as well as Captain Kangaroo and the others being combat vetrans.
But economic facts are economic facts.  If you can please tell me how, using a supply and demand curve that free anything will not create a shortage then by all means I will agree with you. 

[two-blocked]

What is this a trick question?
 
The supply and demand curve is a  contrived model mainly used to teach theory in Econ 101. Many assumptions and constraints have to be made to keep it relevant as a teaching tool. One of those is that supply is controlled by a fixed resource. If the resource is not limited no shortage will be experienced.  How's that for your answer?
 
You trot it out as the end-all explanation for everything.  It's a useful precisely formulated conceptual tool that clever people have devised to help others gain an abstract understanding of a complex world. It does not—nor should it be expected to—give us in addition an accurate and complete description of any particular real world market.
 
If this is the extent of your economics degree, you should ask for your money back.
 

[gypsyman]

They should have never given it to him in the first place. Makes them look like a bunch of old lady's, OOHH Bama, your such a sweet young boy, your such a cutie,(pinch cheek), here's a piece of candy. I'll borrow a phrase from the tv show All in the Family. Their a bunch of meat heads, dead from the neck up. And, now they want it back. Guess they realized he's just another war mongering Democrat. gypsyman

[mcwoodduck]

What is this a trick question?
 
The supply and demand curve is a  contrived model mainly used to teach theory in Econ 101. Many assumptions and constraints have to be made to keep it relevant as a teaching tool. One of those is that supply is controlled by a fixed resource. If the resource is not limited no shortage will be experienced.  How's that for your answer? Not a good one.  Sounds more like a little kid telling you if you need more money just go to the ATM and get it out.    A supply and demand curve is an economic law like "a body in motion will remain on motion until another force or forces acts opon it, is a law of gravity  and you can not tell me that the laws of gravity have too many avariables to be relevant. 
But if you can come up with a better model that predicts peoples spending habits based on a DEMAND economy that does not have shortages then you can win a Nobel prize. 
 
You trot it out as the end-all explanation for everything.  It's a useful precisely formulated conceptual tool that clever people have devised to help others gain an abstract understanding of a complex world. It does not—nor should it be expected to—give us in addition an accurate and complete description of any particular real world market. I find it works in real life all the time.  Economic laws explain the limited resources and the unlimited wants of people.  It explains the how people think and helps to set production goals. 
Now if you can explain how if you raise taxes itr does not effect price in the market I would love to see it. 
 
If this is the extent of your economics degree, you should ask for your money back. If that is what you know you should take a few classes.