This sure doesn't look like a rock.

[Argent 88]

And it isn't dirt on a camera lens. It's an old story but it still hasn't been explained. And it's Ben swept under
the rug. NASA posted this pic for awhile then they just abruptly stopped. This site was the only one who still
had it. The head is to smooth to be just anyother rock. It hasn't been tampered with only enhanced.
It's exactly the one NASA used.



https://youtu.be/qqYSmtKqWsk

[Argent 88]

But we need to be carful with these things. A lot of conspiracy theorist are out there. It could have been
doctored to look like something it isn't. From original NASA photos.

[Bob Riebe]

One of the fails of digital pictures, when the raw image is actually enlarged , not a repro print,  they become rectangles, with film it is dots so if you blow it up lack of, or depth of focus shows but the image does not turn into rectangles.

[Argent 88]

There are a lot of pictures from the Curiosity rover that bring up questions and attempted explanations.
The blue sky from time to time is also one of them. When I first saw this photo from NASA it wasn't
holding anything, and now it is? Someone's messing around with it and a few others also.

[oldandslow]

I went to the link. Someone was having fun when they enhanced that image. 

[Argent 88]

I went to the link. Someone was having fun when they enhanced that image.

Yup, that doesent look anything like the original. The original was probably just a pile of rocks.
Wasn't holding anything, head didn't look like an ant.