Author Topic: SCOTUS re-assignments  (Read 2356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TM7

  • Guest
SCOTUS re-assignments
« on: November 20, 2020, 12:30:46 PM »

Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Barret and Alito have been assigned full control over the circuit courts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia. This is a new development that just happened today. This marks an EXTREME escalation in the election fraud issue, and as a bonus, today it was revealed that it was indeed Trump that seized the German based server and his team has it.

This means untrustworthy Roberts is out of picture mostly.
.
.

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2020, 02:36:30 PM »
   Who s    reporting Trump seized the server ?

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2020, 03:10:54 PM »
Well all this sounds too good to be true. Have you got a "reassuring source" TM?
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline geezerbiker

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1884
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2020, 10:06:42 PM »
If the CIA was in charge of the operation it would explain why there wasn't a lot of news about it...

Tony

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2020, 01:55:25 AM »
Tm are you reading out of Epoch Times? That's what their saying but I can't find any hard facts on the servers being siezed.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2020, 03:08:39 AM »
Check it out.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2020, 03:48:10 AM »
The left is still insisting that the German servers story is false. But the Dominion " makers of the servers"
CEO has disappeared and can't be found. Hugo Chavez who was the Venezuela communist dictator used them.
Donated by George Soros.

It's beginning to look like there's some truth to this story. Also, a significant amount of our overseas military's mail in ballots were never delivered, or counted. Warning, YouTube is about to censer this, if it isn't true then why are the liberals so worried about it?


Offline ironglows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4387
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2020, 04:24:23 AM »
It is somewhat disheartening that so often when a familiar member here posts something, there are almost immediately a chorus if posts saying, "prove it"..
   Often this stuff is not hard to discover for ourselves, if we just take a  couple moments and search, rather than to imply that another member is stringing them a line.
  Yes, I have asked for links before, but usually only when I haven't been able to find such myself..

   Anyway, here's what TM was talking about;
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbTzjJVFwKc

   Now, if you need even more help, go to the 3 minute mark for some good news from Sidney Powell..and go to the 5 min mark to hear Sidney explain about the servers !

   Keep in mind, Sidney is the gal who fought the entire Democrat party, plus the Republican deep state.  That is when she exonerated Gen Flynn and proved the above jerks to be massive liars.
"They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns, then it will be through the bullet"      (Saul Alinsky) ...hero of the left..

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2020, 04:46:31 AM »
Here you go IG, for those who don't want to search for it. Or don't believe it.


Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2020, 05:29:59 AM »
It is somewhat disheartening that so often when a familiar member here posts something, there are almost immediately a chorus if posts saying, "prove it"..
   Often this stuff is not hard to discover for ourselves, if we just take a  couple moments and search, rather than to imply that another member is stringing them a line.
  Yes, I have asked for links before, but usually only when I haven't been able to find such myself..

   Anyway, here's what TM was talking about;
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbTzjJVFwKc

   Now, if you need even more help, go to the 3 minute mark for some good news from Sidney Powell..and go to the 5 min mark to hear Sidney explain about the servers !

   Keep in mind, Sidney is the gal who fought the entire Democrat party, plus the Republican deep state.  That is when she exonerated Gen Flynn and proved the above jerks to be massive liars.

TM7, did you get the idea I was questioning your accuracy , or wanting to look at your source to see if it coincided with mine?

We have another self-righteous scolding ironglow-ism, that has once again missed the mark. ::)
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2020, 08:07:14 AM »

The leftist media is quickly censoring all of this. Why are they afraid if the election was so honest?

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2020, 08:26:18 AM »
Might be the election miracle folks were praying for.

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2020, 08:36:55 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2020, 09:00:37 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

There was no "I heard " in that video. Only the facts you have no data to disregard. Trump is still the president, I'm sure he has information that you don't.

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2020, 09:10:09 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

There was no "I heard " in that video. Only the facts you have no data to disregard.

From an earlier post on the same video:
 “I’m hearing it was our forces that got those servers, so I think the government is now working on an investigation of what really happened.”

Sidney Powell

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2020, 09:21:37 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

There was no "I heard " in that video. Only the facts you have no data to disregard.

From an earlier post on the same video:
 “I’m hearing it was our forces that got those servers, so I think the government is now working on an investigation of what really happened.”

Sidney Powell

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #16 on: November 21, 2020, 09:32:16 AM »
Do you honestly think she is accually going to devoulge everything she knows in such of a lying hostile liberal media environment just now?  She's a defence attorney, you go find your own facts it's not her job to do that just yet. Only before a judge. NW, we dont cow down to you or your demands.
 

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #17 on: November 21, 2020, 10:45:30 AM »
The only thing the commiecrats have to say about these development vidios about this new find.
Is Rudy kept wiping the sweat off his head. Rudy is a chome dome. And those lights are hot.

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #18 on: November 21, 2020, 11:10:48 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

Why should she accommodate you? You are the liberal  enemy, you do not tell your enemy your intentions.
 She spelled it out in her videos, that's all you need to know.  She only gives out the reason, not the resolve .

Offline ironglows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4387
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #19 on: November 21, 2020, 02:54:51 PM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.

  I expect Powell , Guliani and the rest of their team, to present their full case before the court.  Courts are funny bodies, they don't like cases presented over public broadcasting before they get to hear the case! 
  I certainly expect also, that team of experienced trial lawyers are well aware of how to handle the hard evidence.  So, I expect that with their cumulative knowledge and experience, they are handling it the way it should be done..
"They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns, then it will be through the bullet"      (Saul Alinsky) ...hero of the left..

Offline Sandhillbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2020, 03:26:50 PM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.


I'm guessing you aren't much of a poker player

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2020, 04:55:16 PM »
  Powell may have them dead to rights , But nobody believes  anything will be done about it .  just be kicked like a can down the road like Clintons emails and the fake dossier .

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #22 on: November 21, 2020, 05:39:49 PM »
Well, Giuliani, Powell, and their help is the only hope this country has right now of staying in tack, so I'm gonna trust that they know that to.
I ain't gonna complain till it plays out, because those two, and a piss and vinegar president are the only ones actually doing anything other than bitchin.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #23 on: November 22, 2020, 06:37:17 PM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.


I'm guessing you aren't much of a poker player

Sandy,

My Bet is they are holding a duece and bluffing that they have a straight flush...  Ooooop's now they have "folded" Ms Powell????

I'm calling - lets move on.

Offline Sandhillbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #24 on: November 24, 2020, 06:19:48 AM »
I hope Ms. Powell presents this evidence in court soon.  I am anxious to see it.  Sorry, "I've heard" is not enough for me to get excited.


I'm guessing you aren't much of a poker player




Sandy,

My Bet is they are holding a duece and bluffing that they have a straight flush...  Ooooop's now they have "folded" Ms Powell????

I'm calling - lets move on.


Yeah, but you seem to want Trump and company to turn each card face up as it 8s dealt to them.

Offline Sandhillbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #25 on: November 24, 2020, 08:23:04 AM »
Here is the evidence


https://hereistheevidence.com/

Offline mcbammer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2249
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #26 on: November 24, 2020, 09:47:33 AM »
   Kavanaugh  is the wildcard , May turnout to be  Roberts clone . I dont trust him .

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #27 on: November 24, 2020, 10:47:36 AM »
Here is the evidence


https://hereistheevidence.com/

Geee should be a slam dunk based on this web site...  How come no court victories so far???  How come court filings (at least one Rudy presented) are NOT claiming fraud??  I still say holding a deuce and hoping the other side folds.  We'll see...

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #28 on: November 24, 2020, 01:49:28 PM »
Never said Ms. Powell wasn't an accomplished lawyer....  Just that when the banner drops, the B.S. stops.  We'll see how she does at the end of the race.  So far I am not changing my bet.

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: SCOTUS re-assignments
« Reply #29 on: November 25, 2020, 05:27:23 AM »
NWB...

Just so we got this all straight.  You believe there was no fraud or cheating in the 2020 Presidential Election. Sleepy Joe simply and honestly won..Do we have that right?

You know what I'm thinking? I'm  thinking
Cohiba Deheke now!
.
.TM7

TM7

There is ALWAYS some attempts at fraud, and it is usually caught.  Like the Republican voter who voted, then went back to the same polling place wearing sunglasses and tried to vote for his son who is a Democrat - caught.  The Republican "ballot harvester" who ended up causing the election to be tossed and re-voted.  Then there are the perversions like the women who registers as MRS.  XXX and is accused of voting her dead husbands vote, even though she has been registering like that for years even when he was alive.  Now lets get to WIDESPREAD and result changing fraud.  They have looked for this for years and haven't turned up anything SIGNIFICANT in the last 50-75 years anyway.  Let's see one case of systemic or significant fraud, then we can agree - this case should be decided before a Judge not on InfoWars.

Still time, waiting.  (Yes I think Joe Biden won the popular vote, and by luck the Electoral vote - which is way to skewed to the rural states that existed when the Constitution was written, just like men only voting)

NWB