NDAK bill would let you sure FB, twitter for restricting free speech. YEEEEESSSS
« on: Today at 11:34:54 AM »
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/twitter-facebook-censorship-state-bill-sueCensored by Twitter or Facebook? This state's bill would let you sue
'I drafted it in December and things have only gotten worse,' the lawmaker told 'Fox & Friends'
By Caleb Parke | Fox News
State lawmaker on bill allowing citizens to sue Big Tech over censorship: 'Things have only gotten worse'
After being shocked by Big Tech censoring President Trump and other conservatives in recent months, Republican state lawmakers introduced a bill that would put social media giants like Twitter and Facebook in legal trouble for restricting political posts in North Dakota.
"I drafted it in December and things have only gotten worse," State Rep. Tom Kading, R-N.D., the lead sponsor of the bill, told "Fox & Friends" Saturday.
VAN DUYNE URGES GOP HOUSE MEMBERS TO 'REFUSE ANY AND ALL' BIG TECH MONEY OVER 'CENSORSHIP'
placeholder
"I'm frankly shocked at what's happening to our country and censoring does not create unity, it does not help the situation of division in our country, and it does not de-escalate the situation," Kading said. "All it really does is make those who have been silenced dig in deeper and be more suspicious of what's going on."
The bill states that social media sites would be liable in a civil lawsuit for damages to a North Dakota resident "whose speech is restricted, censored, or suppressed," as long as it is not "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."
State lawmaker explains bill allowing 'censored' citizens to sue Facebook, TwitterVideo
"If a website comes out and selectively publishes information," Kading explained, citing case law from state supreme courts, "or manipulates true information in order to create a certain desired narrative, this restrictive action can essentially amount to defamation."
WANT TO GET AWAY FROM BIG TECH? HERE’S HOW
Republicans have questioned whether social media giants should still be afforded liability protections under Section 230 -- a rule dating to 1996 that shields social media companies from being held liable for third-party posts on their platforms while allowing them to moderate that content.
The North Dakota state representative believes his bill is in compliance with Section 230, adding: "If Big Tech doesn't follow their terms of service and they are banning one particular political party ... and they censor outside the scope of Section 230, then there's this civil liability."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Free speech experts argue the bill would be challenged in the courts, where it probably wouldn't survive, because users agree to a platform's terms when they sign up.
Fox News' Brooke Singman contributed to this report.
Caleb Parke is an associate editor for FoxNews.com. You can connect with him here
