Author Topic: Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!  (Read 365 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

TM7

  • Guest
Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!
« on: August 24, 2021, 09:23:16 AM »
Best I can tell reading the FDA 'approval' which was incredibly weasel worded, is that the Pfizer jab juice was NOT actually approved, despite what M$M is telling us. BTW, the FDA is 75% funded by big pharma corps if you're wondering if they're looking out for you.

Here's what happened on the clotshot that just got "approved"...,.
The actual shot people know of as the "pfizer shot" never got approved. It stayed as "experimental". However, a second jab under a different name called "Comirnaty" DID get "approved". Here's the kicker: Under emergency authorization the same old clotshot spike protein mutagenic juice can still be administered without approval until enough "Comirnaty" gets produced, apparently they have practically none, and they have millions of vials of the original mutagenic shot we all know and have come to love ready to go that can be completely used up before the "approved" version, (which is probably an identical bioweapon) HAS TO be used, with the previous one then "discontinued".
And as everyone knows, they threw procedure out the window and even Comirnaty has until Halloween 2025 to complete it's safety studies, all the while it will be administered without them.
When I looked at the approval document, it was a lengthy convoluted confusing snake speak script ALL THE WAY THROUGH. With an extended decipher done later, the above is precisely what it really says, in reality the "Pfizer shot" did NOT get approved but re-authorized for use until the tens of millions of shots already made are used, and then they'll switch to the "approved" Comirnaty version which has basically no clinical trials done on it, and are instead PENDING 2025.
So that's great. That's all the time they need to get the de-population done.
.
.


Offline O-mega

  • Quite Professional
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2021, 11:28:50 AM »
Sounded to me like they couldn't patent Pfizer shot so had to name it Comirnaty.
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

Quote
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.
"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it."
~Pericles~

Offline Matt

  • .:{º.º}:.
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2119
  • Gender: Male
    • Inkredible Image
Re: Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2021, 04:03:15 PM »
Sounded to me like they couldn't patent Pfizer shot so had to name it Comirnaty.
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

Quote
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.

If it is the same then why is it that there are no doses available? if it is the same slap a new label on it and keep going. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME The difference is most likely in the stability compounds but none the less they are not the same.
Any fool can know. The point is to understand.”
― Albert Einstein

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2021, 01:18:58 AM »
I have more trust in Truck Stop Sushi than $cience.gov.

Where my mind goes this AM ...
- we won't have enough Comirnaty on hand to implement the SECDEF's jab order effective 15 Sep. Its likely that we're below 50% fully vaccinated, and of those most of them are nearly at the end of their efficacy dates. DOD also went with Moderna and the JJ for logistical concerns; not so much the Pfizer.
- we might have our hands full starting 1 Sep in Afghanistan; right now the unvaxxed are benched from operations in many units. What will we do when all hands are needed on deck?
- and it there's potential that if/while we're distracted in Afghanistan, China will make a move on Taiwan since they know/believe us to be so weak as to be unable to handle both problems (never mind one problem) simultaneously. Again, will vaccines matter in that scenario?
- meanwhile we hear that the WH is not ordering their staff to be vaxxed ...
held fast

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18255
Re: Pfizer jab not really approved...but a new vax was!
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2021, 03:39:27 AM »
i heard it was the same thing. Its just that they had to come up with a name because by law you cant call it what the companies name that manufactures it is.
blue lives matter