First, I'm no professional, but I'm reasonably competent with a handgun: I can put six .357's in the K-1 zone of a Colt silouette (SP?) target at 25 yards in just under two seconds, and I can hit a 6" fence post at 200 MEASURED yards about 3 or 4 times out of five with my iron sighted Redhawk.
That said, I used to carry a Charter Arms .44 Bulldog as my carry gun, with a stiff handload that I could keep on a pie plate at 25 yards. And I have had to pull it on several ocasisons, varying from civil unrest (when the Black Panthers were trying to burn down Atlanta Ga.) to attempted rapes (not me, but once of my wife and another time of a neighbor lady).
But I was reflecting on those experiences a while back, and realized that this level of inconvenience had never been necessary. It has been my experience that very few things have a greater sobering or civilizing influence on drunks and criminals that the sudden and unexpected sight of a pistol muzzle, and the angry face behind it. It has never once failed to produce exceedingly sober, polite and civil individuals who spend most of their time saying "Yes sir" and wishing the police would HURRY!
And the size of the hole in the end of the bore has had absolutely no effect on those results. I have gone to carrying either a tiny .32 revolver with some rather interesting handloads, or a tiny .22 semiauto, depending on my clothing and the situation.
I admitt that I have had some qualms about this choice. I am a big bore fan, and no mistake. I still have a callus in the web of my right hand from the hammer of a Colt Gold Cup, about 15 years after I quit shooting it. But I'm enough of a marksman that I don't think that - if the situalion required it - I'd have a great deal of trouble doing a great deal of damage with either of those little stingers, and in a very brief span of time. We all have to make compromises, and this one seems reasonable to / for me.
Thoughts and reactions?
kbmoly