Well, I don't have an accepted narrative. I'm like most people trying to figure out what in the world happened.
But you do seem have a narrative i.e. "cops do no wrong and investigators will get to the truth", which is BS.
And just to 'trigger' you off, it looks like 19 cops trapped the shooter in a classroom with kids and waited, waited until BP swat opened the door and went in to kill the shooter.
That's the distilled narrative without obfuscations. Isn't it?
.
Why is it that my links are always faulty, but yours are always correct? Why is it that in your "Russia crusade", ALL TV NEWS MEDIA is in the tank for nato, and the Ukraine, but this time you're accepting news media reports on the news media outlets.
How is it when I say we should wait on the investigation to be completed, you construe it to defense of the cops?
Are you against the truth?
I, from the very beginning, have said: Let's wait until the investigation is complete, and see precisely who did what, and why.
Bugeye became hysterical, and rabidly started making accusation after accusation, that cannot be substantiated to be true, or untrue until the investigation is complete.
He does however, have company, though not to his extreme. You included
I'm gonna wait for the final investigation myself.
I want the truth, while Bugeye, and others, want to be right.
You, like Bugeye, cherry pick links that go with your opinions/agenda. You two should consider teaming up, as your "modus operandis" are near identical.
I think Lloyd is on to sumthin.