Since I don't ever look good doing anything I guess I won't make a response to that.
On the subject at hand, I have found it makes a difference because of caliber. I'm 6'3". That makes a difference too. I first got a Marlin in 44 mag, 20". Worked fine. Changed calibers to 38 so I got a 24" '66. Loved it. Was a little heavy on the front end because of the little hole in that long barrel. Didn't notice until my wife shot it and said something. So I got a 19" '73 carbine. Better but, did I mention I'm 6'3"? I had to bend down a little more to pick it up. Not a big deal but did I mention I weigh about 350? Decided to quit so I sold all of the above. Then I thought, even if I don't shoot matches I still like shooting these types of guns so I got a '73 rifle 24" in 45. Has some weight but I shoot, well not hot but not weak either, cowboy loads (never shoot hot loads in a toggle-link action rifle). Has a little kick so the weight helps but it's not as front heavy as the 357 long barrels. My wife hits steel all day long offhand at 100 yards with it. It's fun cause our 100 yard target sits in the shadows all day. Got to find it first!
In summary, it depends on caliber and shooter. I say long octagons for big holes and carbines for shorter guys or smaller calibers. Short guys should not suffer from barrel envy. The short rifle (20" ocatgon) is a great compromise. Really sucks the recoil out of 38s if you are shooting in a hurry. Then again, it's all in what you like. I always carried a carbine on my saddle but I was younger, more limber and didn't have to bend over to pick it up from where it was staged. Mounted shooters know this too.