Sabotloader,.... I can "co-exist" with those of you thet don't consider "traditionalist" as some kind'a "wannabe's",....... but instead,...... try'n understand thet ther are "THOSE" of us who make a "study" of old and traditional muzzleloaders and other "facets" of a "by-gone era" in our nation's history!!
Some of this "study" is accomplished by apply'n practical application thru "living history research",.... in other "words",.. we read about something in "documents, letters, and stories",.. then we use practical application to apply what we've discovered in order to see if it works for us,... if it don't,... then it's back to "MORE" research.
I have always tryed to tell folks thet I personaly think, ALL of the "above" should be considered irrespective, "EXCEPT" only those "things" directly associated with the historical (traditional), firearms, powder, and projectiles, themselves and ther "traditional place and application" on this,..... "TRADITIONAL" Muzzle Loading Rifle & Shotgun Forum!!
Some folks jest DON'T like hear'n tha "truth" if it conflicts with sumpthin thet they've purchased with ther hard-earned money.... and I can certainly understand thet, and I have no problem with ther "attitude" 'long as they don't attempt to call me (or, my friends) "names", accuse us of be'n "holier than thou", or attempt to mislead shooters in regards to the term "traditional",.... and etc.
To "bend the rules" is one thing,.. but to declare the "bent rules" as "traditional" is anuther!!
As you well know ('cause you are a history teacher),.... "HISTORY IS IMPORTANT", as a learn'n tool for the future,.. but,.. only if it is presented "correctly" when it is discussed or studied!!
So "YEAH",.... I think, I can "git along" with a "history teacher"!!
On all the "other" sites I frequent,... my "signature line" is,.......
"History DOES repeat itself!!"
(I don't know why I ain't never changed it here!!)