complete insanity

[DDZ]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/on-this-date-51-years-ago-climate-scientists-predicted-a-new-ice-age-was-coming

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/

Here is one of NASA scientists predicting a coming ice age in 1971

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/noel-sheppard/2007/09/19/nasa-scientists-predicted-new-ice-age-1971

[Dee]

The government for the last 75 years has looked for something to scare the population bad enough that they would turn complete control of our lives over to them.
They got really close with COVID-19.

[DDZ]

The government for the last 75 years has looked for something to scare the population bad enough that they would turn complete control of our lives over to them.
They got really close with COVID-19.

Yep make people afraid and the majority will cave to any kind of tyranny.

[ironglow]

Been going on a little longer than that.

In 1824, Joseph Fourier calculated that an Earth-sized planet, at our distance from the Sun, ought to be much colder. He suggested something in the atmosphere must be acting like an insulating blanket. In 1856, Eunice Foote discovered that blanket, showing that carbon dioxide and water vapor in Earth's atmosphere trap escaping infrared (heat) radiation.

In the 1860s, physicist John Tyndall recognized Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the atmospheric composition could bring about climatic variations. In 1896, a seminal paper by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first predicted that changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could substantially alter the surface temperature through the greenhouse effect.

In 1938, Guy Callendar connected carbon dioxide increases in Earth’s atmosphere to global warming. In 1941, Milutin Milankovic linked ice ages to Earth’s orbital characteristics. Gilbert Plass formulated the Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climate Change in 1956.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence.amp

  ... And throughout the 1990s and 2000s, Rush Limbaugh was explaining how the Commie/leftists were using a manufactured 'crisis' of "global warming", in their attempt to fool millions and seize power for themselves.. in their drive to place America under a Marxist yoke !
 
   Many have been fooled...

   Rush said we have little to do with such silliness..  Soon, as the natural cycles showed that we have cooling as well as warming cycles, the Commie
   pretenders to their chagrin, changed "global warming"..to "climate change"..

   Rush also said that the sun..you know..Helios...that big fireball in the sky, is the most preeminent source of climate for this "little, old earth".

      Now our braniac president, along with his 'monkey do' followers are suggesting a parasol be installed between us and the sun!  Not that it would
      work, but at the least, they are admitting that, RUSH WAS RIGHT !

[Dee]

Maybe they're gonna use tax money to buy a volcano.

[Mule 11]

They’ll just team up with bill gates again, ya know, the one who wants to reduce global population.

[TrumpWon]

The whole logic that "climate scientists got it wrong in the 70's so they must be wrong now" is a flawed ad hominem argument that says nothing about the current science of anthropogenic global warming. Is it really appropriate to compare a single study in the 70's to the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming today?

https://skepticalscience.com/They-predicted-an-ice-age-in-the-70s.html

[DDZ]

Instead of reading comic books and People Magazine in the 70’s you should have been reading scientific journals. The vast majority of climate papers in the 1970s predicted warming.

https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm

I guess you just blew off the article about NASA scientists predicting an ice age in 1971. Instead you dig up garbage from some garbage climate alarmist website.

Since you seem to be infatuated with the skeptical science website. I looked into it just for a minute, and it pretty much what I figured it was.  LOL, John Cook, a self employed cartoonist that pretends to be a Nazi. 
http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html

[Mule 11]

Instead of reading comic books and People Magazine in the 70’s you should have been reading scientific journals. The vast majority of climate papers in the 1970s predicted warming.

https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm

I guess you just blew off the article about NASA scientists predicting an ice age in 1971. Instead you dig up garbage from some garbage climate alarmist website.

Since you seem to be infatuated with the skeptical science website. I looked into it just for a minute, and it pretty much what I figured it was.  LOL, John Cook, a self employed cartoonist that pretends to be a Nazi. 
http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html

Well this thread is about “ complete insanity “ flounder fills the bill...

[Dee]

I don't think he's insane. He's pretty apt at pushing some folks here's buttons. But he does have trouble with discernment.

[TrumpWon]

Can anyone discern the cause of this?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/earth-has-just-experienced-the-hottest-day-we-have-ever-seen/ar-AA1dq1N7?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=c1aafdef28594900bd8428d2fd50b225&ei=37

[Lloyd Smale]

GOD

Can anyone discern the cause of this?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/earth-has-just-experienced-the-hottest-day-we-have-ever-seen/ar-AA1dq1N7?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=c1aafdef28594900bd8428d2fd50b225&ei=37

[Dee]

Can anyone discern the cause of this?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/earth-has-just-experienced-the-hottest-day-we-have-ever-seen/ar-AA1dq1N7?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=c1aafdef28594900bd8428d2fd50b225&ei=37

Ecclesiastes Chapter 10 verse 14. A fool multiplies words, though no man knows what is to be, and who can tell him what will be after him?

[ironglow]

  The moon landing... nobody could deny that the moon exists.  ..But before we spend more trillions of dollars on the so=called "climate change", it should be proven conclusively, that such a problem exists.

  So far as the colleges and other institutions becoming corrupt, here is a list of the Communist goals to take over America, compiled in 1963..

  Not just a figment of some conspiracy theorists imagination, this is in the congressional record.  ..And it looks like they are succeeding very well.

      Note especially #6, #26 and #30, to observe their success..

     https://www.marxists.org/subject/art/literature/children/ref/gov/gov1.html

[TrumpWon]

“But before we spend more trillions of dollars on the so=called "climate change", it should be proven conclusively, that such a problem exists.”

Who are you waiting for? Every scientific organization, every branch of our armed forces and even oil companies recognize the facts.

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/isnt-there-lot-disagreement-among-climate-scientists-about-global-warming

https://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html

https://www.defense.gov/spotlights/tackling-the-climate-crisis/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

[gypsyman]

Your real good at finding ''scientists'' that get paid to find things. Like Dr. Fauchi, covid, and the billions they made from a vaccine. How about checking with John Coleman, Frank Batten, founders of the weather channel. Dr. Judith Curry, 30+ year climatologist. According to them, climate change is a naturally occurring event.  Glad I had my ivermectin 2 years ago. CDC and Fauchi said back then, it didn't work. Now that they made their millions, it works. Like climate change, when Gore and the rest have made millions/billions, oh, guess climate change is something money can't change. Guess we have to live with it.

[DDZ]

Cornell has almost 100% of its donations go to democrats, and liberal political action committees. 
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/10/over-99-of-cornell-faculty-political-donations-go-to-democrats-and-liberal-pacs/

Wikipedia is well known not as a reliable source of information. Anyone can contribute to the site which is mostly liberal professors and students.

The NOAA climate.gov site is nothing but a fraudulent entity.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/

All the people leading the OPR in Calif. have been appointed by the Marxist Gavin Newsome

The DOD says climate change is a national security threat, while the same Biden regime that is pushing the fraudulent climate change agenda is letting millions of unknown threats cross our borders. 

The scientificamericn rag endorsed Biden and referred to DeSantis as a fascist. they also had numerous articles bashing trump in many different ways. Nothing more need to be said or believed from this leftist American hating rag.

[ironglow]

“But before we spend more trillions of dollars on the so=called "climate change", it should be proven conclusively, that such a problem exists.”

Who are you waiting for? Every scientific organization, every branch of our armed forces and even oil companies recognize the facts.

    ..Every scientific organization the left will lisyten to.. Our Military..? ..    Yeah the same military that is filled with perverts
    leadership who are pushing LGBTQ crap, and don't know what to do with real military.. As proven by the shameful desertion in Afghanistan.
     
     They are so out of touch that they can't even come anywhere near filling enlistment quotas.

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change

  Yes, Cornell, now there is an institution, that can't seem to find conservative, patriot instructors to work there.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change

  Uh-huh Wikipedia..an opinion piece..just an opinion by a contributor.

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/isnt-there-lot-disagreement-among-climate-scientists-about-global-warming

https://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html

https://www.defense.gov/spotlights/tackling-the-climate-crisis/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
 The same science that said an ice age was on the way in the 1970s, and now predicts the earth to fry..within 10, 12 or 15 years.

   Perhaps the more honest way to look at this, is to look at the motivations of a select group of "control freak", super billionaires

[TrumpWon]

ad hominem away!

[ironglow]

Instead of reading comic books and People Magazine in the 70’s you should have been reading scientific journals. The vast majority of climate papers in the 1970s predicted warming.

https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm

   While I appreciate you recent efforts to discuss the "climate change" issues, since most lefties won't, you still have not answered some of the
   most pressing questions..

  So, let us start a rational discussion.. How about answering a few simple questions, to start?

 A)  Why is the Plymouth Rock, still in the very same tidal situation it was in 1620?

 B)  Why is the polar ice cap still firmly in place, despite Al Gore's insistence that it should have melted down years ago?

  C) Since they are demanding that we crimp our comparatively mild lifestyles, why do the climate gurus still live in mansions and fly in
  private jet planes?

  D) If it is carbon produced by us that is causing the "problem", why is Biden and Gates, talking about trying to block the sun..

      ..... Of course, Rush cited the sun as our most potent source of climate variations.

  E) Many of the loudest mouths in that cult, are or have been in leadership positions.  It is an age old axiom, that leaders show the way by
    demonstrating their convictions in their own lives...which is the essence of LEADERship !  Why do those "leaders" fail in this respect?

 F) In recent years, the PTB changed from "global warming" to "climate change", if this new term is accurate, why are they always pressing about
     rising temperatures, and never about falling temperatures ?  Is their new descriptor of "climate change" a mistake?

[nw_hunter]

Hottest days on record in the usa
The sky is falling, the sky is falling

State   Temp.
°F   Temp.
°C   Date   Station   Elevation
in feet
Alabama   112   44   Sept. 5, 1925   Centerville   345
Alaska   100   38   June 27, 1915   Fort Yukon   est. 420
Arizona   128   53   June 29, 1994   Lake Havasu City   505
Arkansas   120   49   Aug. 10, 1936   Ozark   396
California   134   57   July 10, 1913   Greenland Ranch   -178
Colorado   115   46   July 20, 2019   John Martin Reservoir   3,852
Connecticut   106   41   July 15, 1995   Danbury   450
Delaware   110   43   July 21, 1930   Millsboro   20
D.C.   106   41   July 20, 1930   Washington   410
Florida   109   43   June 29, 1931   Monticello   207
Georgia   112   44   Aug. 20, 1983   Greenville   860
Hawaii   100   38   Apr. 27, 1931   Pahala   850
Idaho   118   48   July 28, 1934   Orofino   1,027
Illinois   117   47   July 14, 1954   E. St. Louis   410
Indiana   116   47   July 14, 1936   Collegeville   672
Iowa   118   48   July 20, 1934   Keokuk   614
Kansas   121   49   July 24, 19361   Alton (near)   1,651
Kentucky   114   46   July 28, 1930   Greensburg   581
Louisiana   114   46   Aug. 10, 19361   Plain Dealing   268
Maine   105   41   July 10, 19111   North Bridgton   450
Maryland   109   43   July 10, 19361   Cumberland & Frederick   623; 325
Massachusetts   107   42   Aug. 2, 1975   New Bedford & Chester   120; 640
Michigan   112   44   July 13, 1936   Mio   963
Minnesota   114   46   July 6, 19361   Moorhead   904
Mississippi   115   46   July 29, 1930   Holly Springs   600
Missouri   118   48   July 14, 19541   Warsaw & Union   705; 560
Montana   117   47   July 5, 1937   Medicine Lake   1,950
Nebraska   118   48   July 24, 19361   Minden   2,169
Nevada   125   52   June 29, 19941   Laughlin   605
New Hampshire   106   41   July 4, 1911   Nashua   125
New Jersey   110   43   July 10, 1936   Runyon   18
New Mexico   122   50   June 27, 1994   Waste Isolat. Pilot Pit   3,418
New York   108   42   July 22, 1926   Troy   35
North Carolina   110   43   Aug. 21, 1983   Fayetteville   213
North Dakota   121   49   July 6, 1936   Steele   1,857
Ohio   113   45   July 21, 19341   Gallipolis (near)   673
Oklahoma   120   49   June 27, 19941   Tipton   1,350
Oregon   119   48   Aug. 10, 18981   Pendleton   1,074
Pennsylvania   111   44   July 10, 19361   Phoenixville   100
Rhode Island   104   40   Aug. 2, 1975   Providence   51
South Carolina   113   45   June 29, 2012   Columbia   292
South Dakota   120   49   July 15, 2006   Fort Pierre   1,434
Tennessee   113   45   Aug. 9, 19301   Perryville   377
Texas   120   49   June 28, 19941   Monahans   2,660
Utah   117   47   July 5, 1895   Saint George   2,880
Vermont   105   41   July 4, 1911   Vernon   310
Virginia   110   43   July 15, 1954   Balcony Falls   725
Washington   118   48   Aug. 5, 19611   Ice Harbor Dam   475
West Virginia   112   44   July 10, 19361   Martinsburg   435
Wisconsin   114   46   July 13, 1936   Wisconsin Dells   900
Wyoming   115   46   Aug. 8, 1983   Basin   3,500
Source: National Climatic Data Center

[Dee]

nw_hunter, don't confuse the lad with facts.

[TrumpWon]

Those data points are weather.
Confused would be not knowing the difference between weather and climate.

[Dee]

Those data points are weather.
Confused would be thinking that’s the same as climate.

TW, in person your likely a pretty nice guy. But nobody here believes the climate change BS your putting out. That nobody includes most of the sane world.

Why in god's name do you get on this sight and portray yourself as a damn fool, because that's what you are doing?

[magooch]

Just imagine the contribution the "global warming" believers could make if they all quit exhaling.