Snopes proves it's bias..

[ironglow]

  If there is anyone who pays any attention to Snopes anymore...check this out.

   Snopes did not like the reports from credible sources, that beheadings were going on, so they hired a 'unbiased writer' named Nur Ibrahim,
   to 'show the truth'..

  https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/10/12/40-israeli-babies-beheaded-by-hamas/

   So; who is Nur Ibrahim?   Obviously by the name..a Muslim..writer..of supposed fact..as well as fiction.  Perhaps there is a good chance that the
    above article was mor fiction than fact.

[TrumpWon]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

[Casull]

Oh, don't worry.  Your side managed to "elect" a thinking impaired senator.

[ironglow]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

  You sure are bilnded by the Commies !  Instead of trading snide remarks, let's ALL take a look at SNOOPS ! 

    I guess I have tested the various "fact checkers", off and on for perhaps 20 years, at least..including Snoops.

   Now..setting the groundwork...

  Using logic, there are two sides to almost any question.  Sometimes one side is correct, sometimes the other side is right.

  Obviously, due to previous experiences and thought patterns you figure the left is most often correct..while I see the right..as most often right.

  Common sense and law of averages, says no political group is ALWAYS correct..

  So, along comes an entity which claims to deal "strictly in the facts"..  So, over the last 20 years, how often has Snoops found the
  Left to be correct and how often the Right to be so?

  An honest "fact checker" would not, could not be entirely one-sided..

  Just in case..if you were honestly wondering...this complete sell out, is what has caused most "fact checkers" to become a laughing stock, rather than anything worthy of consulting for any kind of "facts" !

[Mule 11]

I use allsides, flounder uses emotion and testi and feces flavored ky jelly.

[TrumpWon]

Yawn

[ironglow]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

   LOL..  .. from a guy who instead, trusts in a mental basket case senator..

[Mule 11]

Old flounder is easily bored hence yawn, and has multiple sexual partners and multiple std’s do to his homosexual and common boredom being unable to attain his deranged goals... The fags want a real man which is unattainable in the pinko, fairy fluff world of pillow biting butt pirates...

[ironglow]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

   You may believe that any body who is a Muslim is automatically a terrorist...but that isn't true.  There are some Muslims who do not endorse
     terrorism.

   THat in mind, Dr Oz is an intelligent and logical man who would have been a senator of substance..  His rival is a man who has clearly "lost his marbles"..  The choice was not at all difficult for a perfectly sane voter..

[DDZ]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

   You may believe that any body who is a Muslim is automatically a terrorist...but that isn't true.  There are some Muslims who do not endorse
     terrorism.

   THat in mind, Dr Oz is an intelligent and logical man who would have been a senator of substance..  His rival is a man who has clearly "lost his marbles"..  The choice was not at all difficult for a perfectly sane voter..

Have to wonder how much Oz actually follows the way of the Muslims. He has expressed his opposition to Sharia law, and any of the Muslim rule book for that matter. The stupid clown elected in his place is 10 times more a danger to America than Oz would ever be. Of course if you are a clueless leftist you think that Fetterman is somehow a good choice for a senator. Although Fetterman is very representative of those who voted for him. 

[ironglow]

LOL. From the guy who wanted us to trust in a Muslim senator

   Nice try at deflection Trumpy..  The suggestion was that there are generally 2 sides to any question..one or the other may be correct, but it is
   often by degrees.

  Yet , having observed Snopes over a couple decades..I don't recall them EVER admitting that the right was or is more correct. That defies logic !

    So, Please, if you know of any situation where that supposedly honest "fact checker" ove a 20 year span, EVER admitted that the conservative
    side is correct!

  I searched for a Snopes conclusion concerning the  &^+*#5 up Afghan withdrawal...couldn't find a word... 

   ..And answers Google offered were like this;
 
     https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-afghanistan-withdrawal-congress-war-5ff87c14ffd4f7daaa6675e52d3bba1c

   Most of us are Missourians today, saying "SHOW ME"..       ..No snide remarks..we'll wait...

[Casull]

It's simple IG.  Snopes doesn't fact check the left, only the right.

[Dee]

It's simple IG.  Snopes doesn't fact check the left, only the right.

I don't think Snopes has much in common concerning facts.

[Casull]

It's simple IG.  Snopes doesn't fact check the left, only the right.

I don't think Snopes has much in common concerning facts.

Yep, I should have said "fact check".

[Mule 11]

Yawn

Even if true, all that would be better then being a mentally ill and std riddled fag. Besides, just like me, that is one handsome Mule ...

[ironglow]

   Quitye a pair !