Author Topic: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers  (Read 704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« on: January 24, 2024, 12:17:44 AM »
So the Biden Regime won a 5-4 Supreme Court decision allowing Border Patrol to remove Texas wire and other obstacles installed to stop ILLEGAL BORDER JUMPERS.

The so-called conservative justices that voted with the liberal justices? Chief Justice John Roberts, and Amy Coney Barrett..
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2024, 02:49:28 AM »
So the Biden Regime won a 5-4 Supreme Court decision allowing Border Patrol to remove Texas wire and other obstacles installed to stop ILLEGAL BORDER JUMPERS.

The so-called conservative justices that voted with the liberal justices? Chief Justice John Roberts, and Amy Coney Barrett..

  As I expected... if any "conservatives" were to buckle under, it would be those two..Actually as far as I am concerned, neither has made the grade to
  "conservative" or even "constitutionalist".. (IMO)
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Offline Dixie-Dude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 977
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2024, 03:26:13 AM »
Saw on the "Gateway Pundit" that the Texas national guard is defying the Supreme Court and still installing razor wire.  If all the GOP states would send just a few extra national guardsmen to Texas or even state troopers to help lay more wire faster, it would cut the flow, at least temporarily.  More buses to Delaware and in front of Supreme Court Justices homes, especially the 5.  Enough is enough. 

I read that 85% of the people who voted for Trump in Iowa and New Hampshire said the open border was their #1 reason they voted for Trump.  At least he put up walls with what little money he was given.  I like Arizona's method of using shipping containers stacked two high along the border.  This is a quick and easy way to get it done faster.  Then put razor wire on the top edge and in gaps that might be  between containers.  They could still tunnel, but that would take longer.  Got to do something. 

I do have a question.  Why can't Abbot bus these illegals back into Mexico, about 200-400 miles south of the border?  This is what Eisenhower did.  Is it because legally it is a Federal matter? 
Opelika Portal

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2024, 03:31:22 AM »
  From DD;

   "
I read that 85% of the people who voted for Trump in Iowa and New Hampshire said the open border was their #1 reason they voted for Trump.


   ...And rightly they should...
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5071
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2024, 04:00:04 AM »
Texas refuses to vacate boarder area and puts up more razor wire in defiance of unsupremes. As they should considering the court and the feds are violating the Constitution they swore an oath to uphold. If I were Abbott I’d have my LEO’s show the feds the border of Texas door by any means...

Offline scattershot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 599
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2024, 05:10:05 AM »
Black folks are screaming now that the illegals are cutting into their welfare. That should get some action.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2024, 05:11:47 AM »


I do have a question.  Why can't Abbot bus these illegals back into Mexico, about 200-400 miles south of the border?  This is what Eisenhower did.  Is it because legally it is a Federal matter?

The whole thing is a "federal " matter.

Shipping border jumpers around is to
try and bring national attention to the
matter that most apathetic citizens of
other regions would otherwise blow off
and go back to guzzling their beer and
diddling with their computer or watching
movies on satellite television.
For whatever crazy outrageous reason,
the citizens of states not along the
southern border absolutely refuse to
acknowledge that the border jumper problem
ABSOLUTELY DOES affect them, and
is draining their resources and infrastructure
through the tax dollars that they helped
pay in are being basically given to border jumpers
through free housing and food allowances
and free medical care and education and other
"benefits " that were supposed to be allocated
for the people who had money deducted from
their paychecks over the decades, money that
was supposed to be for their benefit,
and not for somebody that never paid in
a dime to the system,  and doesn't care about
America or the success of America

If you don't care anything about the nation
as it was founded, or it's success or longevity,
you don't need to be here.
There's too many riding the train, and don't
want to rock the boat.

Yeah, the people here absolutely could
stop the illegal border incursion in
minutes/hours if not for the possibility
of illegal incarceration and financial ruin
hanging over their heads.
There's too many sideliners and fence
sitters that wouldn't lift a finger to back
up the people that would step forward to
close the border.
I guess that many will continue to sit
the fence and gawk until they personally
can't get the medical care they've paid
into, or the retirement funding isn't there
or is inadequate, or their loved ones are
ill and are headed toward the grave because
they can't get the proper care needed because
of the lack of available funds and resources
and they'll just have to watch their loved ones
wither away
Yeah, that sounds harsh doesn't it.

When you sit on the fence, you're most
likely to get a picket up the a$$
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2024, 05:13:52 AM »
Black folks are screaming now that the illegals are cutting into their welfare. That should get some action.

Yeah.  Wait until tens of thousands of white
yuppies can't get needed medical care, or there's
no retirement money available.
WOWEE you talk about weeping and wailing
and gnashing of teeth and crocodile tears.  .
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6145
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2024, 05:46:14 AM »
Many of the same idiots that voted for open borders, are now pissing and moaning.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2024, 06:40:38 AM »
Saw on the "Gateway Pundit" that the Texas national guard is defying the Supreme Court and still installing razor wire.  If all the GOP states would send just a few extra national guardsmen to Texas or even state troopers to help lay more wire faster, it would cut the flow, at least temporarily.  More buses to Delaware and in front of Supreme Court Justices homes, especially the 5.  Enough is enough. 

I read that 85% of the people who voted for Trump in Iowa and New Hampshire said the open border was their #1 reason they voted for Trump.  At least he put up walls with what little money he was given.  I like Arizona's method of using shipping containers stacked two high along the border.  This is a quick and easy way to get it done faster.  Then put razor wire on the top edge and in gaps that might be  between containers.  They could still tunnel, but that would take longer.  Got to do something. 

I do have a question.  Why can't Abbot bus these illegals back into Mexico, about 200-400 miles south of the border?  This is what Eisenhower did.  Is it because legally it is a Federal matter?

Months ago, Arizona was ordered to remove the shipping containers, and they did.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline gypsyman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4850
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2024, 03:33:24 PM »
 Sure seems to me that the 10th Amd. in the Bill of Rights gives Texas the power to do what it needs to do, to protect the citizens of that state.
We keep trying peace, it usually doesn't work!!Remember(12/7/41)(9/11/01) gypsyman

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2024, 03:41:20 PM »
All of the civilian citizenry should be
able to defend their home state against
incursions, but there's really no back up
for whoever would try to block illegal
border jumpers from invading, and
someone like myself or others I know
that would help defend the border would
be arrested and imprisoned and charged
and persecuted to the ends of the earth,
and at the very least, completely financially
ruined for life
There's nothing attractive about languishing
in a federal prison cell for a year and a half
awaiting trial for trying to defend the country
that you love
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2024, 12:42:10 AM »
Democrats are telling Biden that he should take command of the Texas National Guard.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6145
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2024, 01:16:46 AM »
And here I thought the constitution says its the duty of the federal government to protect our borders against an invasion. 
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2024, 03:06:15 AM »
And here I thought the constitution says its the duty of the federal government to protect our borders against an invasion.

  Obviously, the Constitution means little or nothing to today's Demon-rats.  Most have been indoctrinated to hate America.

  It raises ire in me, to hear a young person explain (over the last 3-4 decades) that their education as a way to "change things".

   From the 1960s until now, how and why did they want to "change" the USA? If what we have now is what thwey were seeking to do, give them
  a great, big cow-plop for their wasted and evil efforts !
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18247
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2024, 02:15:44 AM »
"Under Title 32, Guard troops may be used within the continental U.S. to perform homeland defense activities. The federal government pays for the costs of the operation, but the governor retains ultimate command and control of the troops."

"Most of the time, state National Guards are commanded by governors. However, presidents have the authority to call them into service to respond to hurricanes, bolster border security, and assist in overseas military operations."

it says to BOLSTER BORDER SECURITY. He does not have the power to use them to use them to open the border. this is just the left trying to stir the pot and get gullible people on the right get all worked up so they can call us a bunch of low IQ redneck knuckle draggers. this for all practical purposes would be biden declaring martial law and even the left knows America wouldnt stand for it and it would destroy their party. its a non issue
blue lives matter

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2024, 07:12:55 AM »
They're trying to provoke a citizen's
armed revolt so as to declare martial
law and suspend elections and begin
wholesale firearms confiscation

Nobody ever wants to say it.
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2024, 08:25:05 AM »
They're trying to provoke a citizen's
armed revolt so as to declare martial
law and suspend elections and begin
wholesale firearms confiscation

Nobody ever wants to say it.

Maybe.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2024, 09:17:17 AM »
They're trying to provoke a citizen's
armed revolt so as to declare martial
law and suspend elections and begin
wholesale firearms confiscation

Nobody ever wants to say it.

Maybe.

Sure they are
This is the last Red governed southern
border state there is.
If bidet can get "proof" that this state
is full of " insurrectionists" , yeah that'll
open the door to federal armed action
and he'll have the appearance of "clean " hands

The fiction writers have been telling the
same scenario for years

In real life,  the gubmint in mexico in
the 1800's did everything they could to
provoke rebellion from the settlers by
filling the ranks of the mexican army with
convicts and criminals who would take
settlers livestock and "requisition" whatever
they saw and wanted from the settlers.
A good many would stop in from their assigned
patrol and enter a settlers cabin and help
themselves to food and a bed whenever
they had the notion.
The settlers of Austin's colony lived
peacefully for years under the rules
originally set down by the mexican
gubmint including learning spanish
and converting to catholicism.
But there were people that didn't
like the settlers and felt chafed
and jealous of their success on
lands that were considered dangerous
and a wilderness to be avoided.
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2024, 09:20:35 AM »
They're trying to provoke a citizen's
armed revolt so as to declare martial
law and suspend elections and begin
wholesale firearms confiscation

Nobody ever wants to say it.

Maybe.

Sure they are
This is the last Red governed southern
border state there is.
If bidet can get "proof" that this state
is full of " insurrectionists" , yeah that'll
open the door to federal armed action
and he'll have the appearance of "clean " hands

The fiction writers have been telling the
same scenario for years

Actually Ranger there are 25 republican governors that have sided with Texas so we're not the last yet
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #20 on: January 26, 2024, 09:31:24 AM »
Correct
The last of the 4 southern border states
is probably what I should have written
kalifornia, arizona, and new mexico
are dem governed
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline scattershot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 599
Re: Supreme Court Rules AGAINST Texas on Border Barriers
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2024, 01:51:06 PM »
The Supreme Court has too many token diversity hires in it.