Our founding father..from Adams to Washington, who would I believe, not agree with either of our two 225s..nor could I.
Having just won a war costing many lives, in order to extricate themselves from a tyrannical government, led by an aristocracy,which had an
"official state church".
They were not about to place that same yoke about their collective necks, all over again! The clarified their convictions in the Bill of rights,
even placing it as #1 !
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
They were emphatic that the government keep "hands off" the churches..plus the churches shall have no special powers in the government.
To tax the church, would give a tyrannical leadership a way to coerse or censor the churches..just as was so with King George III at that time.
Complete seperation is the only way to obey the 1st article.
LBJ back in the 1960s, with the approbation of a pliable congress, passed a law that any church speaking politics from the pulpit, should lose his
tax exempt status.
We know how well that worked out..Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton etc.. went right on politicking from pulpits all over the country..
The only way to avoid such a dishonest practice is ...as anywhere else..FREE SPEECH is also allowed by article 1 !
To tax anything..business, enterprise, club, association or church, only gives an opening for the current administration to censor or
coerse the church's voice.
Today, we have a great divide in our nation, some worship God, others worship Gov..Those who worship Gov have free, untaxed speech,
God's people should have the same rights !
Our 2nd amendment says our RTKBA should not be infringed...suppose government suddenly decided that each of our guns should be
taxed yearly at 20% of value. Would we like that kind of inmfringement?
Same goes for the churches... Considering "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", why should churches accept that
the government be allowed to meddle with the churches in any way ?
If any fault were to be found...beyond LBJ and a super-compliant congress, the clergy who accepted this encroachment, should be cited.