“ So, with that knowledge, he knew just what he had to do to form a competent and honest administration, to serve the people, which he has now done,”
You are more sure about that than i am. What I see is appointment of individuals whose loyalty to Mr. Trump far outweighs what ever expertise they may have. I am sure that you do not see his gradual extension of his power as a threat to the very democracy he purports to defend.
He is a demagogue….and that’s OK with you.
I guess that's how you see it, but many of us see it very differently. Loyalty to the chief is no crime, since the Trump administration is one of "common sense", would it be common sense to pick people who were disloyal to his plan? That is what happened back in 2020..and it STUNK !
Trump is all about chosing people for their merit and competence..and not to fulfil DEI !
You must have noticed, he chose for vice president, a man who ran against him for the top spot.
Perhaps beyond what you see, he did not select his people so much for personmal loyalty, as for loyalty to our country, it's Constitution, Father God,
and the principles and values our forefathers passed onto us.
In recent decades, it is veryt clear that the Democrats have been doing their darndest to destroy ^those^ values..
If he were the megalomaniac you seem to think he is, he would be enlarging the government, rather than reducing it ! (Parkinson's law)
A megalomaniac would be a speaker of the house, who demands a private airplane, similar to Air Force 1.. (Pelosi, in case you forgot)
If a presidential candidate were a megalomaniac, they would spend 1.5 billion dollars on such things as paying million$$ to hire such as
Oprah, Beyonce and other self centered celebrities to perform. Likely she had no clue that such pampered people in themselves, have little
or no power to convince the
thinking electorate.
Kash Patel was just confirmed as FBI director...if he were a conceited person, he would do a Parkinson's, and enlarge the Washington office'
so hne could rule over a little kingdom. Instead, Kash has spoken about greatly reducing or eliminatring the Washington office.
No burgeoning kings (or queens) with the Republicans..they are reducing the size of the government, rather than trying to build a wasteful,
grab-all-you-can-get bureaucracy !
