Author Topic: Bino Question  (Read 536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ercjr2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Bino Question
« on: May 02, 2004, 11:32:39 AM »
Ziess Conquest
Nikon Monarch
Burris Signature
Leupold
Sawaroski
Kahles

Which is the best and why do you thinkso ?
Were can I find the best price?

Offline Wolfe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 86
Bino Question
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2004, 04:56:29 PM »
I sure like my nikon's quite a bit. They are prolly the best bang for the buck IMO.

Offline DesertRam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 205
Bino Question
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2004, 03:54:09 AM »
I might have to agree based on my experience.  I love my Kahles 10X42, but my dad's Nikon ATBs are a pretty close second for less than half the price.  $300 for a decent binocular isn't too shabby.

Offline Thomas Krupinski

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 823
Bino Question
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2004, 04:22:17 AM »
I haven't had an opportunity to test any of the others, but just got back from a turkey hunt and used my new Nikon Monark ABT 8x42's and they performed better than expected.  Easy to use with glasses (a big point for me), handy to carry and fast with a great depth of field.  Seems to be brighter in the shadows.

The only problem I had was with the thin lens cap on the objective lens.  Although not really necessary when carrying they hook on the neck strap and lost one while moving through some brush.  The occular lens covers are one piece and sturdy and secure on the neck strap and stay in place when needed and easy to remove.  

I will have to call Nikon this morning to see if they can send me a replacement for the one I lost just to have it complete.

Offline 4pwr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Bino Question
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2004, 05:15:29 AM »
I've hovered around optic boards for 3 years now.  I own 2 Nikons,1 fujinon,1 leupold,1 pentax,1 B+L, All porros. I have pretty much come to the conclusion that if it has glass and says Nikon,you are OK. I have no idea what are the best binocs. I don't think any one else does either.

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Bino Question
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2004, 06:50:55 AM »
I recommend actually trying a few. I was looking at premium compact binoculars several years ago and it turned out that the Leica 10x were the best for my requirements. They have excellent eye relief and allow me to get full advantage of the binocular without taking off my glasses. The adjustments are also excellent.  They were better ergonomically that the Swarovskis too. The Leupolds didn't seem as good, at least not on ergonomic considerations.

It is really worth a road trip to a big outdoor store, if you don't live near one already.

In summary, the brand is significant, but the model is too, and it has to be a good match for what you expect to use it for.

By the way, eye strain is not a problem with my compacts. I can glass with them for hours without problems.  The only trade-off that they are not as good as others in low-light situations.  This is a small tradeoff for me, as they seem to work well even in forest during fall and winter hunting.  They are too dim before shooting hours and after shooting hours, so that's not a limitation for me.
Safety first

Offline Big

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 117
Bino Question
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2004, 10:17:42 AM »
I tried the more expensive brands.  I could tell a slight difference, but not enough to justify paying $1000 for Swarovskis.  My Nikon Monarch 8x42s have been great, which I bought for about $250 on sale at Galyan's.
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."