Author Topic: 40 Super  (Read 619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
40 Super
« on: May 20, 2004, 05:08:53 AM »
Who knows about this cartridge or who shoots it?  I saw some Starline brass and Triton loads advertised for this necked down 45 wildcat and when I looked at the case it seem so much closer to my original design than the 400 Cor-Bon that I got lustful ( :-D ).  I'm thinking now that I may have found a good source of brass that will chamber better in my 40 cal bbl than the cor-bon cartridge, and that makes me happy but I am wondering if anyone out there has any experience with this cartridge.

It looks like a Ackley Improved version of the 400 Cor-Bon which may well make it more preferable for field use.  

Any info?????????????  Mikey.

Offline MI VHNTR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 280
40 Super
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2004, 05:21:39 PM »
The 40 Super is much more powerful than the 400 Cor-bon, 10mm, etc. Here's a link to some info: http://www.jrwhipple.com/guns/40super.html
From what I've been reading, Triton has gone out of business though. IIRC, some of the 40 Super loads have energy levels above 900 ft/lbs. The 45 Super isn't that bad, as is the 450 SMC. Neither has the power level of the 40 Super though. MI VHNTR
NRA Endowment Member
The Second Amendment isn't about hunting. It's about Freedom.

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
40 Super
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2004, 08:59:10 PM »
Prediction: A year from now nobody will be talking about the .40 super.
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
40 Super
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2004, 03:59:12 AM »
MI VHNTR:  thank you for that information and the web-link.  Yep, the 40 Super looks a hay of a lot like my 40/45 aka 40 Michaels, but with a slightly longer neck.  In the information provided in the link, it provided that a 24 lb recoil spring was used.  When I developed my cartridge I used a Wolff 22 lb recoil spring kit, but the only cast boolets I had available at the time were from either Lyman or RCBS molds (170 gn, 172 gn, 196 gn) and the only jacketed bullet was the old Rem/Win 38-40 3/4 jacket 180 gn soft nose that was used for both rifle and carbine.

With my compensated Gold Cup and a 22 lb recoil spring, the newer 155 gn hps would not cycle the pistol.  I never tried it without the compensator so I don't know if without the additional weight of that attachment a 24 lb spring was necessary.  

Well, at least I know where I can get some decent brass, if I want to use something with a small pistol primer.

Dusty Miller - why do you think the 40 Super (and possibly other wildcats like that) will pass into history sooner than later??????????  Mikey.

Offline MI VHNTR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 280
40 Super
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2004, 04:59:00 PM »
Mikey, here's another link about the 40 Super. There's no real hard data in it, but it makes for interesting reading.
http://www.handgunsmag.com/ammunition/1911_hot_rods/index1.html
MI VHNTR
NRA Endowment Member
The Second Amendment isn't about hunting. It's about Freedom.