Greenhill's Formula, circa 1879, calculates the longest bullet that 1:60-inch twist can stabilize is .729 inch. Unfortunately, calculations on paper and fifty cents will get us coffee for one;
Sometimes, though, a rifle takes control -- bullets that shouldn't be stable ARE, and ones that should be AREN'T; hence my asking for information from people who have used these bullets in GPR.
*********
HWooldridge: You have a simple, elegant solution. Where would I find tubing about .545 inch ID?
********
Thomas Krupinski: The purpose for the rifle is Rocky Mountain elk and mule deer.
Why do you believe the shorter bullet is better? If, and I'm saying IF, both bullets are stable, I'll be zeroing to a cone of fire that will be in the kill zone from muzzle to about 110 meters. Since penetration rather than velocity (aka hydrostatic shock) is the killing force for muzzleloading bullets, I would assume bigger is better.
********
Ramrod: Lard and beeswax? Lard?? I'm curious. Can any animal rendered animal fat be substituted? Is there some reason why natural ingredients are used rather than petroleum products?
*******
Please don't comment on this, guys.
Perhaps we might consider heating huge quantities of Ramrod's lubricant and spray it on ammo dumps, house and buildings where Islamic enemies congregate. If it can cause the Sepoy Rebellion in India in 1857, will it deter people, who consider cloven-hoofed animals unclean, from touching or using what has been covered with "unclean" contaminants? Or is this voodoo?