Author Topic: Re: New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE  (Read 1389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline K2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
Re: New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« on: July 17, 2004, 10:12:46 AM »
I like the changes also.  No barrel band appeals to my taste.
Quote from: C130E
This is on the to buy list, yup.

http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/FAProdView?model=1159&return=Y

Offline Bang

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • http://home.comcast.net/~ms97116/
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2004, 06:27:15 PM »
You would think Ruger would take the hint. Most people buy their rifle and strip it down to the receiver and spend another $300\-$500 average to build it into a descent shooter. Why not give people what they want and pocket the extra money?

Bang
Sometimes you want to go where everybody calls you names.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2004, 10:14:39 AM »
C130E,

I'll have to go down and check them out.  I could live with a 20" barrel although it could be 2" longer.  Just goes to show you the Ruger 10/22 is still the best going in a semi-auto .22.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2004, 02:44:51 PM »
Lawdog

   If you prefer the extra 2", look for one of the Walmart 10/22 rifles they offered a while back.  They were "k" models (stainless/silver) but I believe they had 22" bbls.
"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2004, 07:26:19 AM »
BlkHawk73,

Actually I believe that the "K" model had an 18" barrel but no matter, I have a personal thing against stainless steel in barrels and actions.  Also don't like plastic stocks(synthetic) or even laminated ones.  Thanks anyway.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline K2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2004, 08:32:17 AM »
Most people strip it down and spend $300-$500 on there 10/22?  Gotta love this kind of logic!  Do more than 1 in 100 10/22 buyers strip their guns down and spend twice what they paid for them?  Doubtful.  

Does Ruger build what they do cause it doesn't sell?  No the 10/22 has sold millions because it is a good gun for the money.  The only reason the aftermarket fellows only keep the receiver and toss the rest is because they don't want to go thru the hoops that Ruger does to manufacture a gun in America and they need that receiver for the serial number.   The receiver becomes the "gun" because that is where the number is.  

Ruger is giving people what they want and their sales numbers prove it.  Ruger brought out a target model 10/22 but I am willing to bet that is not "good enough" for the tear em down group, who will always find a reason to bad mouth the true production guns that sell by the millions.   The real mfgs do all the R&D and do their best to keep things affordable.  If they do a good job and folks buy them in droves then some complain cause they can't get one (short supply), if the mfgs pick up the pace on production then some complain that the quality control sucks.  If some dumbo shoots his buddy with a Ruger that has been heavily modified, they (Ruger) still get hauled into court even though the only thing left on the gun that Ruger made was the receiver.  Frankly I am amazed that the mfgs keep doing what they do, and they get a big tip of the Fedora from me for their efforts.

Thanks Ruger, keep up the good work!!    
Quote from: Bang
You would think Ruger would take the hint. Most people buy their rifle and strip it down to the receiver and spend another $300\-$500 average to build it into a descent shooter. Why not give people what they want and pocket the extra money?

Bang

Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2004, 12:13:33 PM »
Quote from: Lawdog
BlkHawk73,

Actually I believe that the "K" model had an 18" barrel but no matter, I have a personal thing against stainless steel in barrels and actions.  Also don't like plastic stocks(synthetic) or even laminated ones.  Thanks anyway.  Lawdog
 :D



   Just as a clarification, the Walmart Rugr I mentioned was: Model #RUK1022-2. 22" stainless barrel, no band, checkered wood stock Sells for around $215.  The silver 10/22 actions aren't stainless either,  They're of the same aluminum material that the blued models are.  


   Ruger isn't a maker of high-end specialty guns.  They make firearms for the common folk.  Those that want the tackdriving sub MOA accuracy from thier 10/22 have no problems aboput spending the $ to achieve what they want.  besides it allows Ruger to sell their guns and other comapnies to also profit from it.  Good for all!
"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline K2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2004, 01:42:36 PM »
I have no problem with the mods blkhawk, just with folks saying Ruger isn't giving folks what they want.  The sales numbers prove otherwise.  
Quote from: BlkHawk73
Quote from: Lawdog
BlkHawk73,

Actually I believe that the "K" model had an 18" barrel but no matter, I have a personal thing against stainless steel in barrels and actions.  Also don't like plastic stocks(synthetic) or even laminated ones.  Thanks anyway.  Lawdog
 :D



   Just as a clarification, the Walmart Rugr I mentioned was: Model #RUK1022-2. 22" stainless barrel, no band, checkered wood stock Sells for around $215.  The silver 10/22 actions aren't stainless either,  They're of the same aluminum material that the blued models are.  


   Ruger isn't a maker of high-end specialty guns.  They make firearms for the common folk.  Those that want the tackdriving sub MOA accuracy from thier 10/22 have no problems aboput spending the $ to achieve what they want.  besides it allows Ruger to sell their guns and other comapnies to also profit from it.  Good for all!

Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
New Ruger 10/22 RIFLE
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2004, 03:46:36 PM »
I think Ruger is doing a good job of keeping such acomplete line in thier catalog.  They also have all the special runs and distributor editions to produce as well.  There's always going to be those that think everything should be 100% their way from the factory.  There's also those that don't think very much at all for the 10/22.  Well, these models and many other basic models can't be so bad if so very many of them have been sold.  
   Other manufacturers make 10/22 style recievers but charge 2 - 3 times the cost of a complete Ruger gun.  Worth it?  I guess to those that demand that extra precision and materials but not me.  I'm happy with my Ruger made ones.
"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline Savorino

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
New Ruger?
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2004, 06:18:18 PM »
How is this different from the 10/22 deluxe they've always sold?
Plus two inches of barrel. Minus for a cheaper non-Walnut stock(no band).
Not much different.
Some have said that 18"'s of barrel is enough, more could slow the bullet down.
Sav
"and remember, always keep your stick on the ice".