I have a friend that is getting a brand new gun (Tikka .270WSM), scope,etc.,and he is putting all faith into me to tell him which scope (and gun for that matter) to get: Wow thats alot of responsibility for a friend!!! (But he trusts me, so im going to run with it)
He said he wants a Nikon scope........somewhere between a 4-12 (or 16), or a 3-10(in that range of mag.) .........he also wants at least a 44 mm lens (or bigger)
He has seen my new 4-12x50 Buckmaster and likes it, but i thre a few other options out there mainly concerning Monarchs. His price can go up to $350 ( or maybe a lil more if it is that good of a scope)..........i came up with the 3.3-10x44 AO Monarch for about $325, or (b/c he likes high mag).........a 5.5-16.5x44 for $375.
But me personally for what he will be using the gun for (mainly during the day, and not much towards evening (unless he hasnt yet killed one) I recommended the 4.5-14x40 Nikon Buckmaster for $239. In my opinion that wold be the best choice for his price range (his parents are buying the gun and he is buying the other stuff).
What do yall think?? I think a Tikka .270WSM (The synthetic model) with a black matte Nikon Buckmaster would pretty darn good, and would shoot well also!! (the main reason i think he would like the 4.5-14 is the greater magnification, [but not too much])
Another option would be a 4-16x50 Mueller Rifle scope with the Red dot. It costs $199. (I am thinking of getting a CZ Varmint .22lr, and would want to top it off with this scope, THAT WOULD BE ONE TREE RAT KILLIN MACHINE!! ) What do yall thnik about the Mueller scope??
Thanx ahead of time, and sry it is soooooooo long!!