festus and jdt: whatever 6.5 Carcano ammo you can find out there will be expensive and the huntsman will just have to spiek good $ for a box or two to see if his Carcano hits where he points it. As I mentioned before - my experiences with this caliber/rifle vary quite a bit, from being pretty good shooters to trench diggers.
You cannot knock the caliber however. The 6.5 Carcano was loaded with a 160 grain bullet and in the 6.5 caliber, that weight bullet really does a job. If you look at the all-time 6.5 favorite, the 6.5 Swede, the heavy 160 grain bullet is recommended for large heavy game animals. It is not surprising that your 6.5 penetrated that much tree. I used one in Colorado for a number of hunts and it worked very, very well on deer sized critters, penetrating through and through on shoulder shots out to about 150 yds. But, that bullet is heavy for the bore and I would have expected that type of penetration.
And, yessir Advocate, your 220 grain 06 will do what the 6.5 Carcano did to that tree, but look where you have to go to get there. That's one of the phenomena that makes the 6.5 calibers great hunting hunting cartridges. Heck, the 6.5 is so good that remington came out with its 260 - which is 'on par' with the 6.5 Swede. Ain't it interesting how they have to make something new and then compare it to the old standard just to show how far they have/have not come along. And BTW, when I load for a 30 caliber bore, my bullet weight/design decision choice is based on the capabilities of cartridges like the 6.5 and to get the degree of penetrability in the 30 caliber to mimic the 6.5 I find I need at least a 200 grain bullet.
Wow, and I remembered all this. I need a doughnut. This is Mikey.