My guess is that the pressure of that load is actually very very very high. If you look closely, Paco uses 8 grains of Bullseye in the huge .35 Whelen Improved case, not the tiny .357 case. Putting that much Bullseye into .357 Mag brass with the same huge bullet is really courting disaster! Using .357 Magnum brass, Speer lists a 8.7 grain load of Bullseye as maximum with a 110-grain bullet. Lyman lists 6.1 grains of Bullseye as producing 39,300 cup in .357 Brass with a 170-grain cast bullet.
As I'm sure you are aware, primer shape is a very poor method of "guessing" pressures, regardless of what Paco says. (I corresponded with Paco years ago, I like and respect the man, but some of his theories and ideas are not supported by science or engineering fact.) Hornady looked into this over a decade ago and found primer appearance to be almost useless in gauging accurate pressures. Ditto Speer, this is one reason their listed max loads have dropped significantly over the past 25 years - they got pressure reading equipment and demonstrated that primer appearance can be a poor indicator.
"Slightly sticky" extraction should be a clue - with the small diameter .357 brass, case head thrust has to be pretty high to show sticky extraction, particularly when .223 ammo (same diameter) is loaded to well over 50,000 cup with no signs of stickyness. It's your gun and your hand of course, but I'd caution you either to use much less Bullseye, or to switch to a slower powder.